Dear Mr Sarma,
I read fully the observation of the psychologist. While 90% I agree with it,
10% I differ. He might be frustrated for some other reasons also. He is not
able to take things in light spirit.
Mr Rajaram shows his frustration to fellow members of the groups more than to
any body of the family ,members who are well above or equal to him in their
intelligence. Any thing written as a note or moral, he feels intended at him
and him only.
As the psychologist observed , I feel better ignore his responses marking to
SPAM. If at all we read, we may refrain from responding, which may sometimes
improve the patient Mr Rajaram.
I am 150% sure Mr Rajaram will respond, he himself is better than the
psychologist, well studied psychiatry, and he is not the patient, we are
patients.
Sir, No insane will admit he is insane.
Gopalakrishnan
On Thursday, 22 February, 2024 at 06:35:04 am IST, Laxminarayan Sarma
<[email protected]> wrote:
Most Respected Narayanaswamy Anna and Shri Gopalakrishnan-ji
I think we shouldn't any more try to persuade a certain bureaucrat to be
rational, to be sensible and to stop posting plagiarised or cut and paste
stuff.
I happened to come across a psychologist at a meeting of the local Rotary Club.
Among other topics during my chat with him, i also mentioned about our
"friend" After hesring me out patiently, the psychologist said that certain
persona, suffer from self delusion This condition is rooted in his social
origin,parebtal and family cutcumstances, acute inferiority complex, over
estimating his iwn worth, timidity, lack of self confidence, self worth etc.. I
was informed that these guys throw their weight around and bully and browbeat
those vlwhom they consider as weak. MOST OF THE WIFE BEATERSbelong to this
category
Shri Narayanaswamy Anna with his vast reading, knowledge and experience can
surely throw more light on this
As for me, i shall leave the poor creature alone because, i fear, the guy,
unable to counter arguments, may be getting frustrated and beating up his wife
On Wed, 21 Feb, 2024, 4:16 pm Narayanaswamy Iyer, <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear folks
My easy-to-answer specific queries to Karuppan-chaami the permanently
unemployed ex-exciseman alias KR ex-IRS alias Cockroachmoorthy (for whom the
Devil finds work for idle hands) were:-
"Where in the r'g-vedam is mentioned the ancient rivers of Persia such as the
Tigris and the Euphrates? In ashtakam 1, mandalam 1? Since our
anti-establishment rebel boasts that Mandalam 10 is the youngest, are the
Persian rivers named in Mandalam 1, the oldest?
"Further, if in mandalam 10 the r'g-vedam says that god Varunan "tore a path"
eastwards for the ambitious all-conquering Sindhu, why does not that same
mandalam say how the Irrawaddy (Airavathi) river in Burma, the Chao Praya river
in Siam, and the Salween and the Mekong rivers further east got their names
(e.g. as eastwards extension of the Sindhu)?"
Why does the unemployed ex-exciseman close his eyes like the proverbial cat and
think the world is dark, just because he has been caught for the umpteenth time
with his foot in his mouth?
Is he "begging-in-line" waiting for the anti-Hindu Islamists in Pakistan to
throw him a few pieces of dead fish? Or, perhaps a gnawed-through femur bone
of a slaughtered cow, as reward for his past three decades of dedicated work as
a Pakistani mole?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:01 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:
Because narayanasamy and co idiots are begging in line KR
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:35, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear folks
Of late, our notorious braahmana-basher, Hindu-hater, Veda-vilifier,
anti-establishment rebel, and consistent blasphemer has been polishing the
charisma of the saptha-sindhus, and the superiority of the Indus river over all
others.
His latest attempt at pro-Pakistan propaganda was his misreading,
misunderstanding, misquoting and misinterpretation of r'g-vedam ashtakam 8,
chapter III, sooktham 75, vargams 6 & 7, and sookthan 76, vargam 8. The Indus
river, with its tributaries Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej, today lies
entirely in Islamic anti-Hindu Pakistan. And has been so since Partition.
Why is he trying to boost the image of India's mortal enemy at the expense of
the greatness of India's own sacred rivers?
Before we start our poojas, we invoke into our kalasha-theertham the spirit and
sanctity of the seven sacred rivers, chanting:- gange cha yamune chaiva
godaavari, sarasvathi, narmade, sindhu, kaaveri, jale-asmin sannidham kuru.
Curiously, according to a recent article in these columns by Sri Venkat Giri
Sridharan, our Aadi Shankaraachaarya, in his sthala-yaathra throughout
Bhaarathe-varsham, on departing from Dvaaraka in South India, went to Karachi,
to Gandhara, to Peshawar, and to Takshila where he visited the famous Buddhist
university. He engaged in debates with opposing scholars there and defeated
all of them in arguments.
He then proceeded to journey through Persia (present-day Afghanistan-Iran),
reviving and re-establishing Vedic awareness, principles and practices there,
before going to Gaya.
Where in the r'g-vedam is mentioned the ancient rivers of Persia such as the
Tigris and the Euphrates? In ashtakam 1, mandalam 1? Since our
anti-establishment rebel boasts that Mandalam 10 is the youngest, are the
Persian rivers named in Mandalam 1, the oldest?
Further, if in mandalam 10 the r'g-vedam says that god Varunan "tore a path"
eastwards for the ambitious all-conquering Sindhu, why does not that same
mandalam say how the Irrawaddy (Airavathi) river in Burma, the Chao Praya river
in Siam, and the Salween and the Mekong rivers further east got their names
(e.g. as eastwards extension of the Sindhu)?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhMwTpLBx%3DLBAyudZAOUsCB4zmKxrsjva4fC%3DSvXanxV8A%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAEcNPKpUr6hL6r64JLUPvi4US%2BS14MEM2Bz%3DEugUdpfYb0OjCw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/1681946046.3180968.1708566539207%40mail.yahoo.com.
