Thank you G for the true admissions KR On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 19:49, 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty < [email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Mr Sarma, > > I read fully the observation of the psychologist. While 90% I agree with > it, *10% I differ*. He might be frustrated for some other reasons also. > He is not able to take things in light spirit. > > Mr Rajaram shows his frustration* to fellow members of the groups more > than to any body of the family *,members who are well above or equal to > him in their intelligence. Any thing written as a note or moral, he feels > intended at *him and him only*. > > As the psychologist observed , I feel better ignore his responses marking > to SPAM. If at all we read, we may refrain from responding, which may > sometimes improve the > * patient Mr Rajaram. * > > I am 150% sure Mr Rajaram will respond, he himself is better than the > psychologist, *well studied psychiatry,* and he is not the patient, we > are patients. > > Sir, No insane will admit he is insane. > > Gopalakrishnan > > On Thursday, 22 February, 2024 at 06:35:04 am IST, Laxminarayan Sarma < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > *Most Respected Narayanaswamy Anna and Shri Gopalakrishnan-ji* > > *I think we shouldn't any more try to persuade a certain bureaucrat to be > rational, to be sensible and to stop posting plagiarised or cut and paste > stuff. * > > *I happened to come across a psychologist at a meeting of the local Rotary > Club. Among other topics during my chat with him, i also mentioned about > our "friend" After hesring me out patiently, the psychologist said that > certain persona, suffer from self delusion* > * This condition is rooted in his social origin,* > *parebtal and family cutcumstances, acute inferiority complex, over > estimating his iwn worth, timidity, lack of self confidence, self worth > etc.. I was informed that these guys throw their weight around and bully > and browbeat those vlwhom they consider as weak. MOST OF THE WIFE BEATERS* > *belong to this category* > > > > > *Shri Narayanaswamy Anna with his vast reading, knowledge and experience > can surely throw more light on this As for me, i shall leave the poor > creature alone because, i fear, the guy, unable to counter arguments, may > be getting frustrated and beating up his wife * > On Wed, 21 Feb, 2024, 4:16 pm Narayanaswamy Iyer, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Dear folks > > My easy-to-answer specific queries to Karuppan-chaami the permanently > unemployed ex-exciseman alias KR ex-IRS alias Cockroachmoorthy (for whom > the Devil finds work for idle hands) were:- > > "*Where in the r'g-vedam is mentioned the ancient rivers of Persia such > as the Tigris and the Euphrates? In ashtakam 1, mandalam 1? Since our > anti-establishment rebel boasts that Mandalam 10 is the youngest, are the > Persian rivers named in Mandalam 1, the oldest? * > > "*Further, if in mandalam 10 the r'g-vedam says that god Varunan "tore a > path" eastwards for the ambitious all-conquering Sindhu, why does not that > same mandalam say how the Irrawaddy (Airavathi) river in Burma, the Chao > Praya river in Siam, and the Salween and the Mekong rivers further east got > their names (e.g. as eastwards extension of the Sindhu)?"* > > Why does the unemployed ex-exciseman close his eyes like the proverbial > cat and think the world is dark, just because he has been caught for the > umpteenth time with his foot in his mouth? > > *Is he "begging-in-line" waiting for the anti-Hindu Islamists in Pakistan > to throw him a few pieces of dead fish? Or, perhaps a gnawed-through femur > bone of a slaughtered cow, as reward for his past three decades of > dedicated work as a Pakistani mole?* > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:01 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Because narayanasamy and co idiots are begging in line KR > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 21:35, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Dear folks > > Of late, our notorious braahmana-basher, Hindu-hater, Veda-vilifier, > anti-establishment rebel, and consistent blasphemer has been polishing the > charisma of the saptha-sindhus, and the superiority of the Indus river over > all others. > > His latest attempt at pro-Pakistan propaganda was his misreading, > misunderstanding, misquoting and misinterpretation of r'g-vedam ashtakam > 8, chapter III, sooktham 75, vargams 6 & 7, and sookthan 76, vargam 8. > > The Indus river, with its tributaries Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and > Sutlej, today lies entirely in Islamic anti-Hindu Pakistan. And has been > so since Partition. > > Why is he trying to boost the image of India's mortal enemy at the > expense of the greatness of India's own sacred rivers? > > Before we start our poojas, we invoke into our kalasha-theertham the > spirit and sanctity of the seven sacred rivers, chanting:- gange cha > yamune chaiva godaavari, sarasvathi, narmade, sindhu, kaaveri, jale-asmin > sannidham kuru. > > Curiously, according to a recent article in these columns by Sri Venkat > Giri Sridharan, our Aadi Shankaraachaarya, in his sthala-yaathra throughout > Bhaarathe-varsham, on departing from Dvaaraka in South India, went to > Karachi, to Gandhara, to Peshawar, and to Takshila where he visited the > famous Buddhist university. He engaged in debates with opposing scholars > there and defeated all of them in arguments. > > He then proceeded to journey through Persia (present-day > Afghanistan-Iran), reviving and re-establishing Vedic awareness, principles > and practices there, before going to Gaya. > > Where in the r'g-vedam is mentioned the ancient rivers of Persia such as > the Tigris and the Euphrates? In ashtakam 1, mandalam 1? Since our > anti-establishment rebel boasts that Mandalam 10 is the youngest, are the > Persian rivers named in Mandalam 1, the oldest? > > Further, if in mandalam 10 the r'g-vedam says that god Varunan "tore a > path" eastwards for the ambitious all-conquering Sindhu, why does not that > same mandalam say how the Irrawaddy (Airavathi) river in Burma, the Chao > Praya river in Siam, and the Salween and the Mekong rivers further east got > their names (e.g. as eastwards extension of the Sindhu)? > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhMwTpLBx%3DLBAyudZAOUsCB4zmKxrsjva4fC%3DSvXanxV8A%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhMwTpLBx%3DLBAyudZAOUsCB4zmKxrsjva4fC%3DSvXanxV8A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAEcNPKpUr6hL6r64JLUPvi4US%2BS14MEM2Bz%3DEugUdpfYb0OjCw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAEcNPKpUr6hL6r64JLUPvi4US%2BS14MEM2Bz%3DEugUdpfYb0OjCw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thatha_Patty" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/1681946046.3180968.1708566539207%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/1681946046.3180968.1708566539207%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopue-3pbvT7h3ypPvcHMb5QA5gHEqYEiG6pyg0aRhicCA%40mail.gmail.com.
