Respected Mr Sarma, Mr Rajaram is the most uncivilized and uncultured person I have seen in my life. You can expect and immediate Tamil abuse. He calls idiot, rascal, bastard etc. often me, Mr revered Narayanaswamy and you. Gopalakrishnan
On Wednesday, 13 March, 2024 at 11:04:04 am IST, Laxminarayan Sarma <[email protected]> wrote: IaRSe Whoreson Bastard, understand that you're a stinking skunk of a eunuch whore and cannot equal one millionth 9f a millimetre of Anba's ine strand of pubic hair Then, mother fucker, why don't you just shut your arse of a mouth and emitting foul stink out of it Bastard, if you're man enough, i chaloenge you to a man to man fight. I swear I will kick the shit out of you. On Mon, 11 Mar, 2024, 6:39 pm Rajaram Krishnamurthy, <[email protected]> wrote: 👊💩👊👹👊👺👊💤🥱 On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 04:32, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote: Dear folks Super-extra idiot Rajaram K alias KR ex-IRS alias Karuppan-chaami alias Cocokroachmoorthy, even when being eaten slowly by tissue by bone by skin by brain, by other parts by worms six feet underground cannot refrain from squeaking lies, abuses and insults. When alive, the demented aged imbecile ex-exciseman never read either Professor Parkinson's "Parkinsin's Law" or the follow-up "The Law and the Profits", or any other of the professor's publications. I have. Seating arrangements in the British Parliament and in the French legislature are not, and never were, part of Parkinson's Law. Is the putrid corpse letting the hoary-headed cat out of the bag when it quotes a non-existent alleged remark:- "Pretty good for a man of eighty-two, what?" Was that the mortal earthly human age of late unregretted "zero-know-how KR IRS 11324" when he kicked the bucket? S Narayanaswamy Iyer On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:54 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: This idiot Narayana sirs, always like frogs gets hit and never feels ashamed; Parkinson law either he should have read fully or if he had not read start reading it and then answer; seeing the net and quoting the net always lands him as usual , not only in trouble; but also exhibiting his as usual ignorance is exposed; and his pretension tricks are also exposed . Those who knew about the book may write so; it is an extracted page of the book; because Narayana idiot name was there, he got furled up. Good day Te Narayana. Should you lose your respect so badly and still reveal your zero know-how? KR IRS 11324 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 21:12 Subject: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Parkinson's law an extract To: <[email protected]>, iyer <[email protected]>, Laxminarayan Sarma <[email protected]>, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> Cc: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> Dear folks Our indomitable super-ignoramus starts off his brainless voluminous copy-pasting, with his usual screeching, screaming, and shouting:- "PARKINSON’S LAW EXTRACT ANY RESEMBLANCE IS REGRETTED KR IRS 11324" The uneducated dolt, unmitigated fool and incorrigible idiot does not know that Parkinson's Law merely states that work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion. It has nothing to do with whether the French prefer legislators to sit in a circle, or whether the British prefer two benches of Members facing each other in Parliament. S Narayanaswamy Iyer On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:58 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: PARKINSON’S LAW EXTRACT ANY RESEMBLANCE IS REGRETTED KR IRS 11324 In France the initial mistake was made of seating therepresentatives in a semicircle, all facing the chair. The resulting confusioncould be imagined if it were not notorious. No real opposing teams could beformed and no one could tell (without listening) which argument was the more cogent.There was the further handicap of all the proceedings being in French— anexample the United States wisely refused to follow. But the French system isbad enough even when the linguistic difficulty does not arise. Instead ofhaving two sides, one in the right and the other in the wrong— so that theissue is clear from the outset— the French form a multitude of teams facing inall directions. With the field in such confusion, the game cannot even begin.Basically their representatives are of the Right or of the Left, according towhere they sit. This is a perfectly sound scheme. The French have not gone tothe extreme of seating people in alphabetical order. But the semicircularchamber allows of subtle distinctions between the various degrees of tightnessand leftness. There is none of the clear-cut British distinction betweenrightness and wrongness. One deputy is described, politically, as to the left ofMonsieur Until but well to the right of Monsieur Quelque chose. What is anyoneto make of that? What should we make of it even in English? What do they makeof it themselves? The answer is, "Nothing." All this is generally known. What is less generallyrecognized is that the paramount importance of the seating 16 plan applies toother assemblies and meetings, international, national, and local. It applies,moreover, to meetings round a table such as occur at a Round Table Conference.A moment's thought will convince us that a Square Table Conference would besomething totally different and a Long Table Conference would be differentagain. These differences do not merely affect the length andacrimony of the discussion; they also affect what (if anything) is decided.Rarely, as we know, will the voting relate to the merits of the case. The finaldecision is influenced by a variety of factors, few of which need concern us atthe moment. We should note, however, that the issue is actually decided, in theend, by the votes of the center bloc. This would not be true in the House of Commons,where no such bloc is allowed to develop. But at other conferences the centerbloc is all important. This bloc essentially comprises the following elements: a. Those who have failed to master any one of thememoranda written in advance and showered weeks beforehand on all those who areexpected to be present. b. Those who are too stupid to follow the proceedings atall. These are readily distinguishable by their tendency to mutter to eachother: "What is the fellow talking about?" c. Those who are deaf They sit with their hands cuppingtheir ears, growling "I wish people would speak up." d. Those who were dead drunk in the small hours and haveturned up (heaven knows why) with a splitting headache and a conviction thatnothing matters either way. e. The senile, whose chief pride is in being as fit asever— fitter indeed than a lot of these younger men. "I 11 walkedhere," they whisper. "Pretty good for a man of eighty-two,what?" f The feeble, whohave weakly promised to support both sides and don't know what to do about it.They are of two minds as to whether they should abstain from voting or pretendto be sick. Toward capturing the votes of the center bloc the firststep is to identify and count the members. That done, everything else dependson where they are to sit. The best technique is to detail off known andstalwart supporters to enter into conversation with named middle-bloc typesbefore the meeting actually begins. In this preliminary chat the stalwarts willcarefully avoid mentioning the main subject of debate. They will be trained touse the opening gambits listed below, corresponding to the categories a to /,into which the middle bloc naturally falls: a. "Waste of time, I call it, producing all thesedocuments. I have thrown most of mine away." b. "I expect we shall be dazzled by eloquence beforelong. I often wish people would talk less and come to the point. They are half tooclever, if you ask me." c. "The acoustics of this hall are simply terrible.You would have thought these scientific chaps could do something about it. Forhalf the time I CAN'T HEAR WHAT IS BEING SAID. CAN YOU?" d. "What a rotten place to meet! I think there issomething wrong with the ventilation. It makes me feel almost unwell. Whatabout you?" e. "My goodness, I don't know how you do it! Tell methe secret. Is it what you have for breakfast?" f "There's so much to be said on both sides of the 18questions that I really don't know which side to support. What do you feel aboutit?" If these gambits are correctly played, each stalwart willstart a lively conversation, in the midst of which he vows steer his middle-blockmantoward the forum. As he does this, another stalwart will place himself just aheadof the pair and moving in the same direction. The drill is best illustrated bya concrete example. We will suppose that stalwart X (Mr.Sturdy) is steeringmiddle-blossman Y (Mr. Waverley, type f) toward a seat near the front. Aheadgoes stalwart Z (Mr. Staunch), who presently takes a seat without appearing tonotice the two men following him. Staunch turns in the opposite direction andwaves to someone in the distance. Then he leans over to make a few remarks tothe man in front of him. Only when Waverley has sat down will Staunch presentlyturn toward him and say, "My dear fellow— how nice to see you!" Onlysome minutes later again will he catch sight of Sturdy and start visibly withsurprise. "Hallo, Sturdy— I didn't think you would be here!""I've recovered now," replies Sturdy. "It was only a chill." The seating order is thus made to appear completely accidental, casual,and friendly. That completes Phase I of the operation, and it would be much thesame whatever the exact category in which the middle-blockman is believed tofall. Phase II has to be adjusted according to the character ofthe man to be influenced. In the case of Waverley (Type f) the object in PhaseII is to avoid any discussion of the matter at issue but to produce theimpression that the thing is already decided. Seated near the front, Waverleywill be unable to see much of the other members and 19 can be given theimpression that they practically all think alike. "Really," says Sturdy, "I don't know why Ibothered to come. I gather that Item Four is pretty well agreed. All thefellows I meet seem to have made up their minds to vote for it." (Oragainst it, as the case may be.) "Curious," says Staunch. "I wasjust going to say the same thing. The issue hardly seems to be in doubt." "I had not really made up my own mind," saysSturdy. 20 "There was much to be said on either side. But opposition wouldreally be a waste of time. What do you think, Waverley?" "Well," says Waverley, "I must admit that Ifind the question rather baffling. On the one hand, there is good reason toagree to the motion ... As against that... Do you think it will pass?" "My dear Waverley, I would trust your judgment inthis. You were saying just now that it is already agreed. " "Oh, was I? Well, there does seem to be a majority.... Or perhaps I should say ..." "Thank you, Waverley," says Staunch, "foryour opinion. I think just the same but am particularly interested to find youagree with me. There is no one whose opinion I value more." Sturdy, meanwhile, is leaning over to talk to someone inthe row behind. What he actually says, in a low voice, is this, "How isyour wife now? Is she out of the hospital?" When he turns back again, however,it is to announce that the people behind all think the same. The motion is asgood as passed. And so it is if the drill goes according to plan. While the other side has been busy preparing speeches andphrasing amendments, the side with the superior technique will have concentratedon pinning each middle-blockman between two reliable supporters. When the crucialmoment comes, the raising of a hand on either side will practically compel thewaverer to follow suit. Should he be actually asleep, as often happens withmiddle-blockman in categories d and e, his hand will be raised for him by themember on his right. This rule is merely to obviate both his hands beingraised; a gesture that has been known to attract unfavourable comment. With themiddle bloc thus secured, the motion will be carried with a comfortable margin;or else rejected, if that is thought preferable. In nearly every matter ofcontroversy to be decided by the will of the people, we can assume that thepeople who will decide are members of the middle bloc. Delivery of speeches istherefore a waste of time. K Rajaram IRS 11324 -- On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KeralaIyers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopoR_G6sFwYGKDm%2B_FgbVkpdt40N-nFpBQ2p1j%2B1tJ3VQ%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iyer123" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhOX6w-HSL-bNmzHQuWqAQedWyNrLG7xFuS2d%3D%2B1Bky%2Bzw%40mail.gmail.com. -- On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KeralaIyers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZoov71nF_G85K04x-iDa4LgXe4M9JMM%3D6KW8wAruogsuig%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iyer123" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNL%3DJbYL%3DX6ozBnZL713bKKrm7W0kTNnP92R946KwzVTw%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/1971699604.2279656.1710309147610%40mail.yahoo.com.
