Oh look beyond the Back licker LN sarama the dog swerling its tail, shows
the loyalty to the rogues. One to one dual? Then either he must be a
cowboy of Mexico which is not; so must be chennai north madras pettai
Rowdy' and do they employ in army Rowdies also? HAVE YOU GONE MAD(RAS CAL)
CUT(T{A- B}OMB BAY? 👊👺👹💩👎🌚🙊🙉🙈😭🦟🪲🦗🐜🎃👻💤
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Laxminarayan Sarma <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 00:34
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Parkinson's law an extract
To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
Cc: Kerala Iyer <[email protected]>, gopala krishnan <
[email protected]>, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]>
*IaRSe*
*Whoreson *
*Bastard, understand that you're a stinking skunk of a eunuch whore and
cannot equal one millionth 9f a millimetre of Anba's ine strand of pubic
hair *
*Then, mother fucker, why don't you just shut your arse of a mouth and
emitting foul stink out of it *
*Bastard, if you're man enough, i chaloenge you to a man to man fight. I
swear I will kick the shit out of you.*
On Mon, 11 Mar, 2024, 6:39 pm Rajaram Krishnamurthy, <[email protected]>
wrote:
> 👊💩👊👹👊👺👊💤🥱
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 04:32, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear folks
>>
>> Super-extra idiot Rajaram K alias KR ex-IRS alias Karuppan-chaami alias
>> Cocokroachmoorthy, even when being eaten slowly by tissue by bone by skin
>> by brain, by other parts by worms six feet underground cannot refrain from
>> squeaking lies, abuses and insults.
>>
>> When alive, the demented aged imbecile ex-exciseman never read either
>> Professor Parkinson's "Parkinsin's Law" or the follow-up "The Law and the
>> Profits", or any other of the professor's publications. I have.
>>
>> Seating arrangements in the British Parliament and in the French
>> legislature are not, and never were, part of Parkinson's Law.
>>
>> Is the putrid corpse letting the hoary-headed cat out of the bag when it
>> quotes a non-existent alleged remark:-
>>
>> "*Pretty good for a man of eighty-two, what?*"
>>
>> Was that the mortal earthly human age of late unregretted "zero-know-how
>> KR IRS 11324" when he kicked the bucket?
>>
>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:54 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This idiot Narayana sirs, always like frogs gets hit and never feels
>>> ashamed; Parkinson law either he should have read fully or if he had not
>>> read start reading it and then answer; seeing the net and quoting the net
>>> always lands him as usual , not only in trouble; but also exhibiting his as
>>> usual ignorance is exposed; and his pretension tricks are also exposed .
>>> Those who knew about the book may write so; it is an extracted page of the
>>> book; because Narayana idiot name was there, he got furled up. Good day Te
>>> Narayana. Should you lose your respect so badly and still reveal your zero
>>> know-how? KR IRS 11324
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 21:12
>>> Subject: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Parkinson's law an extract
>>> To: <[email protected]>, iyer <[email protected]>,
>>> Laxminarayan Sarma <[email protected]>, gopala krishnan <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> Cc: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear folks
>>>
>>> Our indomitable super-ignoramus starts off his brainless voluminous
>>> copy-pasting, with his usual screeching, screaming, and shouting:-
>>>
>>> "*PARKINSON’S LAW EXTRACT*
>>>
>>> *ANY RESEMBLANCE IS REGRETTED KR IRS 11324*"
>>>
>>>
>>> The uneducated dolt, unmitigated fool and incorrigible idiot does not
>>> know that Parkinson's Law merely states that work expands to fill the time
>>> allotted for its completion.
>>>
>>>
>>> It has nothing to do with whether the French prefer legislators to sit
>>> in a circle, or whether the British prefer two benches of Members facing
>>> each other in Parliament.
>>>
>>>
>>> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:58 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> PARKINSON’S LAW EXTRACT
>>>>
>>>> ANY RESEMBLANCE IS REGRETTED KR IRS 11324
>>>>
>>>> In France the initial mistake was made of seating the representatives
>>>> in a semicircle, all facing the chair. The resulting confusion could be
>>>> imagined if it were not notorious. No real opposing teams could be formed
>>>> and no one could tell (without listening) which argument was the more
>>>> cogent. There was the further handicap of all the proceedings being in
>>>> French— an example the United States wisely refused to follow. But the
>>>> French system is bad enough even when the linguistic difficulty does not
>>>> arise. Instead of having two sides, one in the right and the other in the
>>>> wrong— so that the issue is clear from the outset— the French form a
>>>> multitude of teams facing in all directions. With the field in such
>>>> confusion, the game cannot even begin. Basically their representatives are
>>>> of the Right or of the Left, according to where they sit. This is a
>>>> perfectly sound scheme. The French have not gone to the extreme of seating
>>>> people in alphabetical order. But the semicircular chamber allows of
>>>> subtle distinctions between the various degrees of tightness and
>>>> leftness. There is none of the clear-cut British distinction between
>>>> rightness and wrongness.
>>>>
>>>> One deputy is described, politically, as to the left of Monsieur Until
>>>> but well to the right of Monsieur Quelque chose. What is anyone to make of
>>>> that? What should we make of it even in English? What do they make of it
>>>> themselves? The answer is, "Nothing."
>>>>
>>>> All this is generally known. What is less generally recognized is that
>>>> the paramount importance of the seating 16 plan applies to other assemblies
>>>> and meetings, international, national, and local. It applies, moreover, to
>>>> meetings round a table such as occur at a Round Table Conference. A
>>>> moment's thought will convince us that a Square Table Conference would be
>>>> something totally different and a Long Table Conference would be different
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> These differences do not merely affect the length and acrimony of the
>>>> discussion; they also affect what (if anything) is decided. Rarely, as we
>>>> know, will the voting relate to the merits of the case. The final decision
>>>> is influenced by a variety of factors, few of which need concern us at the
>>>> moment. We should note, however, that the issue is actually decided, in the
>>>> end, by the votes of the center bloc. This would not be true in the House
>>>> of Commons, where no such bloc is allowed to develop. But at other
>>>> conferences the center bloc is all important. This bloc essentially
>>>> comprises the following elements:
>>>>
>>>> a. Those who have failed to master any one of the memoranda written in
>>>> advance and showered weeks beforehand on all those who are expected to be
>>>> present.
>>>>
>>>> b. Those who are too stupid to follow the proceedings at all. These are
>>>> readily distinguishable by their tendency to mutter to each other: "What is
>>>> the fellow talking about?"
>>>>
>>>> c. Those who are deaf They sit with their hands cupping their ears,
>>>> growling "I wish people would speak up."
>>>>
>>>> d. Those who were dead drunk in the small hours and have turned up
>>>> (heaven knows why) with a splitting headache and a conviction that nothing
>>>> matters either way.
>>>>
>>>> e. The senile, whose chief pride is in being as fit as ever— fitter
>>>> indeed than a lot of these younger men. "I 11 walked here," they whisper.
>>>> "Pretty good for a man of eighty-two, what?"
>>>>
>>>> f The feeble, who have weakly promised to support both sides and
>>>> don't know what to do about it. They are of two minds as to whether they
>>>> should abstain from voting or pretend to be sick.
>>>>
>>>> Toward capturing the votes of the center bloc the first step is to
>>>> identify and count the members. That done, everything else depends on where
>>>> they are to sit. The best technique is to detail off known and stalwart
>>>> supporters to enter into conversation with named middle-bloc types before
>>>> the meeting actually begins. In this preliminary chat the stalwarts will
>>>> carefully avoid mentioning the main subject of debate. They will be trained
>>>> to use the opening gambits listed below, corresponding to the categories a
>>>> to /, into which the middle bloc naturally falls:
>>>>
>>>> a. "Waste of time, I call it, producing all these documents. I have
>>>> thrown most of mine away."
>>>>
>>>> b. "I expect we shall be dazzled by eloquence before long. I often wish
>>>> people would talk less and come to the point. They are half too clever, if
>>>> you ask me."
>>>>
>>>> c. "The acoustics of this hall are simply terrible. You would have
>>>> thought these scientific chaps could do something about it. For half the
>>>> time I CAN'T HEAR WHAT IS BEING SAID. CAN YOU?"
>>>>
>>>> d. "What a rotten place to meet! I think there is something wrong with
>>>> the ventilation. It makes me feel almost unwell. What about you?"
>>>>
>>>> e. "My goodness, I don't know how you do it! Tell me the secret. Is it
>>>> what you have for breakfast?"
>>>>
>>>> f "There's so much to be said on both sides of the 18 questions that I
>>>> really don't know which side to support. What do you feel about it?"
>>>>
>>>> If these gambits are correctly played, each stalwart will start a
>>>> lively conversation, in the midst of which he vows steer his
>>>> middle-blockman toward the forum. As he does this, another stalwart will
>>>> place himself just ahead of the pair and moving in the same direction. The
>>>> drill is best illustrated by a concrete example.
>>>>
>>>> We will suppose that stalwart X (Mr.Sturdy) is steering middle-blossman
>>>> Y (Mr. Waverley, type f) toward a seat near the front. Ahead goes stalwart
>>>> Z (Mr. Staunch), who presently takes a seat without appearing to notice the
>>>> two men following him. Staunch turns in the opposite direction and waves to
>>>> someone in the distance. Then he leans over to make a few remarks to the
>>>> man in front of him. Only when Waverley has sat down will Staunch presently
>>>> turn toward him and say, "My dear fellow— how nice to see you!" Only some
>>>> minutes later again will he catch sight of Sturdy and start visibly with
>>>> surprise. "Hallo, Sturdy— I didn't think you would be here!" "I've
>>>> recovered now," replies Sturdy. "It was only a chill. " The seating order
>>>> is thus made to appear completely accidental, casual, and friendly. That
>>>> completes Phase I of the operation, and it would be much the same whatever
>>>> the exact category in which the middle-blockman is believed to fall.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Phase II has to be adjusted according to the character of the man to be
>>>> influenced. In the case of Waverley (Type f) the object in Phase II is to
>>>> avoid any discussion of the matter at issue but to produce the impression
>>>> that the thing is already decided. Seated near the front, Waverley will be
>>>> unable to see much of the other members and 19 can be given the impression
>>>> that they practically all think alike.
>>>>
>>>> "Really," says Sturdy, "I don't know why I bothered to come. I gather
>>>> that Item Four is pretty well agreed. All the fellows I meet seem to have
>>>> made up their minds to vote for it." (Or against it, as the case may be.)
>>>> "Curious," says Staunch. "I was just going to say the same thing. The
>>>>
>>>> issue hardly seems to be in doubt."
>>>>
>>>> "I had not really made up my own mind," says Sturdy. 20 "There was much
>>>> to be said on either side. But opposition would really be a waste of time.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think, Waverley?"
>>>>
>>>> "Well," says Waverley, "I must admit that I find the question rather
>>>> baffling. On the one hand, there is good reason to agree to the motion ...
>>>>
>>>> As against that... Do you think it will pass?"
>>>>
>>>> "My dear Waverley, I would trust your judgment in this. You were saying
>>>> just now that it is already agreed. "
>>>>
>>>> "Oh, was I? Well, there does seem to be a majority. ... Or perhaps I
>>>> should say ..."
>>>>
>>>> "Thank you, Waverley," says Staunch, "for your opinion. I think just
>>>> the same but am particularly interested to find you agree with me. There is
>>>> no one whose opinion I value more."
>>>>
>>>> Sturdy, meanwhile, is leaning over to talk to someone in the row
>>>> behind. What he actually says, in a low voice, is this, "How is your wife
>>>> now? Is she out of the hospital?" When he turns back again, however, it is
>>>> to announce that the people behind all think the same. The motion is as
>>>> good as passed. And so it is if the drill goes according to plan.
>>>>
>>>> While the other side has been busy preparing speeches and phrasing
>>>> amendments, the side with the superior technique will have concentrated on
>>>> pinning each middle-blockman between two reliable supporters. When the
>>>> crucial moment comes, the raising of a hand on either side will practically
>>>> compel the waverer to follow suit. Should he be actually asleep, as often
>>>> happens with middle-blockman in categories d and e, his hand will be raised
>>>> for him by the member on his right. This rule is merely to obviate both his
>>>> hands being raised; a gesture that has been known to attract unfavourable
>>>> comment. With the middle bloc thus secured, the motion will be carried with
>>>> a comfortable margin; or else rejected, if that is thought preferable. In
>>>> nearly every matter of controversy to be decided by the will of the people,
>>>> we can assume that the people who will decide are members of the middle
>>>> bloc. Delivery of speeches is therefore a waste of time.
>>>>
>>>> K Rajaram IRS 11324
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> On Facebook, please join
>>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>>>>
>>>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>>>>
>>>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>>>>
>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>>>>
>>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
>>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "KeralaIyers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopoR_G6sFwYGKDm%2B_FgbVkpdt40N-nFpBQ2p1j%2B1tJ3VQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopoR_G6sFwYGKDm%2B_FgbVkpdt40N-nFpBQ2p1j%2B1tJ3VQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "iyer123" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhOX6w-HSL-bNmzHQuWqAQedWyNrLG7xFuS2d%3D%2B1Bky%2Bzw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhOX6w-HSL-bNmzHQuWqAQedWyNrLG7xFuS2d%3D%2B1Bky%2Bzw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> --
>>> On Facebook, please join
>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>>>
>>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>>>
>>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>>>
>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>>>
>>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
>>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "KeralaIyers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZoov71nF_G85K04x-iDa4LgXe4M9JMM%3D6KW8wAruogsuig%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZoov71nF_G85K04x-iDa4LgXe4M9JMM%3D6KW8wAruogsuig%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "iyer123" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNL%3DJbYL%3DX6ozBnZL713bKKrm7W0kTNnP92R946KwzVTw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNL%3DJbYL%3DX6ozBnZL713bKKrm7W0kTNnP92R946KwzVTw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop2HvceaurzhL3R9o3%3DswpUaJFBLe0ynHP54sK%2BodjS5Q%40mail.gmail.com.
