More fakes:  K Rajaram  IRS  9424
Modi did not write a letter to Chief Justice Chandrachud criticizing him
for selective criticism 0
<https://factly.in/modi-did-not-write-a-letter-to-chief-justice-chandrachud-criticizing-him-for-selective-criticism/#respond>
BY CHAITANYA <https://factly.in/author/chaitanya-gundapu/> ON SEPTEMBER 20,
2023
 video <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INmfHeE5jMU> circulating on YouTube
alleges that Prime Minister Modi has penned a strongly worded letter to
Chief Justice of India Chandrachud. In this letter, the PM purportedly
criticizes the CJI for focusing selectively on Manipur and Article 370
issues while neglecting other matters, such as instances of women’s
atrocities in Rajasthan, West Bengal, and others. The video also claims
that in this alleged letter, Modi accuses the Chief Justice of displaying
bias in his views on various issues and goes as far as stating that he has
formally requested President Murmu to terminate the Chief Justice from his
position. Through this article let’s fact-check the claim made in the video.

*Claim: *Modi has penned a strongly worded letter to Chief Justice
Chandrachud, criticizing his  perceived bias on various issues.

*Fact:* There are no records of Modi writing a letter to the CJI, wherein
he condemns the CJI for displaying bias and selective criticism. Likewise,
there are no accounts of Modi requesting the President for the dismissal of
the CJI. It is improbable that the Prime Minister would correspond with the
President without abiding by the established due process, given that an
impeachment motion must secure a special majority in both houses of
Parliament. Hence, the claim made in the post is *FALSE.*

The viral video claims that Prime Minister Modi vehemently criticized the
Chief Justice of India in a letter, accusing him of partiality on several
matters. Nevertheless, our investigation could not uncover any news
articles or reports confirming the existence of such a letter sent by the
Prime Minister. If, indeed, the country’s Prime Minister had penned such a
letter, it is likely that the media would have covered it extensively.
However, we have found no such reports to corroborate this claim.

Additionally, the video emphasizes that Modi had made a request to the
President to dismiss the Chief Justice from his post. It is important to
highlight that while it is the President’s
<https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1968-51_0.pdf>
authority
to issue an order for the removal of the Chief Justice, such an action can
only be taken following the presentation of an address by Parliament. This
address must garner substantial support, requiring a special majority in
each House of Parliament, meaning a majority of the total membership of
that House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of
that House who are present and voting.

The procedure governing the removal of a Supreme Court judge is stipulated
by the Judges Inquiry Act of 1968
<https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1968-51_0.pdf>,
specifically through the process of impeachment. This procedure is
predicated on two grounds: proven misbehavior or incapacity. Consequently,
the assertion that Modi sought the President’s intervention for the Chief
Justice’s removal implies that it is an unsubstantiated claim, as there has
been no recent parliamentary discussion on the impeachment of the Chief
Justice, and it is improbable that the Prime Minister would write to the
President without adhering to the established due process.

Moreover, there have been no news reports concerning the impeachment of
Chief Justice Chandrachud. If any such discussions had occurred within
political circles, it is likely that the media would have covered them, yet
we have found no such reports. Additionally, there is no indication of
strained relations between the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice. During
their last public appearance together at the Independence Day event, the Prime
Minister
<https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/when-cji-d-y-chandrachud-returned-pm-modis-compliments-with-folded-hands-during-independence-day-celebrations-at-red-fort/articleshow/102749493.cms?from=mdr>
commended
the Supreme Court on several matters.

To sum it up, Modi did not write a letter to Chief Justice Chandrachud
criticizing him for selective criticism

On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 07:03, 'N Sekar' via KeralaIyers <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I am not sure whether the fwd is genuine as the P M would not have used
> such a language
>
> BUT
>
> What is written reflects our views, I hope.
>
> The S C has some really rotten apples including the CJI who seem to be
> keen to play to the
> Gallery
> West
> And the
> Left.
>
> It is a cabal and not a Collegium as nepotism is rampant.
>
> Just see how Teesa Setalvad was given late evening hearings by two benches
> even  after she was convicted by the High court.
>
> Why such special treatment to her and other anti Nationals?
>
> Look at the severe strictures they passed at Nupur Sharma whose plea was
> just to consolidate all the cases to one court
> And
> Hiw they turned a blind eye to the provocative and insulting and demeaning
> statements made against Hindu Gods.
>
> They frequently enter into policy domains which is reserved for the Govt.
>
> These fellows are a total disgrace to the civilized society. I hope God
> helps our Nation to get rid of these scoundrels.
> They will sell our Nation and our Religion.
>
> N Sekar
>
> FWD:
>
> *The Chief Justice has written to the Prime Minister asking for further
> increase in the number of judges in the Supreme Court.*
>
>  *PM's reply*
>
> *Honorable Judge Saheb,  you have the following instructions from the
> public:*
>
>   1:- All you Justices come at 10 o'clock - Lunch -between 2 and 3
> o'clock, then return home at 4 o'clock.  How long will this last??
>   2:- Come at 9 am and work till 6 pm like doctors, engineers, policemen,
> bureaucrats and people from corporate world.
>   3:- Work on Saturdays and Sundays as many doctors and some officers do.
>   4:- Since 1947, from 1st June to 30th June, you enjoy summer vacation.
> Why summer vacation in June when entire SC is centralized AC ??
>   5:- Each Justice shall take only 15-20 days leave in a year.
>   6:- Why waste time deliberately in cases like Jallikattu, Dahihandi??
>   7:- Why are you wasting your time hearing hundreds of useless PILs filed
> by some professionals??
>   8:- EPFO ​​vs pensioners, why you make 3 justice benches and then 5
> justice benches in many cases?
>   9:- Review for traitors, then petitions for correction?  Why do you open
> the court even at night for the poor people who don't have time ???
>   10:- You get crores of salary and facilities from tax payers but zero
> accountability to public.
>   11:- You live in AC bungalows, travel in luxury cars, have elaborate
> security at public expense, so why don't you work hard?
>   12:- All of you will get Cabinet Minister facilities.
>
>    No need to age.  Working days of SC Supreme Court should be increased
> to atleast 300 days which function only 168 days in a year.
>
>   Judges should have no difficulty in working for 300 days while the Prime
> Minister can work for 365 days.
>
>   The poor patriots could bear it no longer.
>
>   *Judiciary is rotten.  There is an urgent and urgent need to improve it.*
> ^JUDICIAL REFORMS NEED OF THE HOUR^
>
>   *Send at least five groups*
>   *some will not send*
>   *But I am sure you will definitely send*
> Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
> <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=NativePlacement&c=Global_Acquisition_YMktg_315_EmailSignatureGrowth_YahooMail:Search,Organize,Conquer&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=Global_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100000945&af_sub5=OrganizeConquer__Static_>
>
> --
> On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>
> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>
> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "KeralaIyers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/1936123849.6082705.1712664192017%40mail.yahoo.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/1936123849.6082705.1712664192017%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooqWmKOV21dH9HJ3iSFDQiPebkmcN3sQAxsLneOtJQRhw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to