If you have read my comments I have clearly stated the message may not be genuine as the P M would not have used such language
BUT I said I agree with the comments. It is time these rascals are shown the mirror. N Sekar On Tue, Apr 9, 2024, 7:53 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: > More fakes: K Rajaram IRS 9424 > Modi did not write a letter to Chief Justice Chandrachud criticizing him > for selective criticism 0 > <https://factly.in/modi-did-not-write-a-letter-to-chief-justice-chandrachud-criticizing-him-for-selective-criticism/#respond> > BY CHAITANYA <https://factly.in/author/chaitanya-gundapu/> ON SEPTEMBER > 20, 2023 > video <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INmfHeE5jMU> circulating on > YouTube alleges that Prime Minister Modi has penned a strongly worded > letter to Chief Justice of India Chandrachud. In this letter, the PM > purportedly criticizes the CJI for focusing selectively on Manipur and > Article 370 issues while neglecting other matters, such as instances of > women’s atrocities in Rajasthan, West Bengal, and others. The video also > claims that in this alleged letter, Modi accuses the Chief Justice of > displaying bias in his views on various issues and goes as far as stating > that he has formally requested President Murmu to terminate the Chief > Justice from his position. Through this article let’s fact-check the claim > made in the video. > > *Claim: *Modi has penned a strongly worded letter to Chief Justice > Chandrachud, criticizing his perceived bias on various issues. > > *Fact:* There are no records of Modi writing a letter to the CJI, wherein > he condemns the CJI for displaying bias and selective criticism. Likewise, > there are no accounts of Modi requesting the President for the dismissal of > the CJI. It is improbable that the Prime Minister would correspond with the > President without abiding by the established due process, given that an > impeachment motion must secure a special majority in both houses of > Parliament. Hence, the claim made in the post is *FALSE.* > > The viral video claims that Prime Minister Modi vehemently criticized the > Chief Justice of India in a letter, accusing him of partiality on several > matters. Nevertheless, our investigation could not uncover any news > articles or reports confirming the existence of such a letter sent by the > Prime Minister. If, indeed, the country’s Prime Minister had penned such a > letter, it is likely that the media would have covered it extensively. > However, we have found no such reports to corroborate this claim. > > Additionally, the video emphasizes that Modi had made a request to the > President to dismiss the Chief Justice from his post. It is important to > highlight that while it is the President’s > <https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1968-51_0.pdf> > authority > to issue an order for the removal of the Chief Justice, such an action can > only be taken following the presentation of an address by Parliament. This > address must garner substantial support, requiring a special majority in > each House of Parliament, meaning a majority of the total membership of > that House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of > that House who are present and voting. > > The procedure governing the removal of a Supreme Court judge is stipulated > by the Judges Inquiry Act of 1968 > <https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1968-51_0.pdf>, > specifically through the process of impeachment. This procedure is > predicated on two grounds: proven misbehavior or incapacity. Consequently, > the assertion that Modi sought the President’s intervention for the Chief > Justice’s removal implies that it is an unsubstantiated claim, as there has > been no recent parliamentary discussion on the impeachment of the Chief > Justice, and it is improbable that the Prime Minister would write to the > President without adhering to the established due process. > > Moreover, there have been no news reports concerning the impeachment of > Chief Justice Chandrachud. If any such discussions had occurred within > political circles, it is likely that the media would have covered them, yet > we have found no such reports. Additionally, there is no indication of > strained relations between the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice. During > their last public appearance together at the Independence Day event, the Prime > Minister > <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/when-cji-d-y-chandrachud-returned-pm-modis-compliments-with-folded-hands-during-independence-day-celebrations-at-red-fort/articleshow/102749493.cms?from=mdr> > commended > the Supreme Court on several matters. > > To sum it up, Modi did not write a letter to Chief Justice Chandrachud > criticizing him for selective criticism > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 07:03, 'N Sekar' via KeralaIyers < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I am not sure whether the fwd is genuine as the P M would not have used >> such a language >> >> BUT >> >> What is written reflects our views, I hope. >> >> The S C has some really rotten apples including the CJI who seem to be >> keen to play to the >> Gallery >> West >> And the >> Left. >> >> It is a cabal and not a Collegium as nepotism is rampant. >> >> Just see how Teesa Setalvad was given late evening hearings by two >> benches even after she was convicted by the High court. >> >> Why such special treatment to her and other anti Nationals? >> >> Look at the severe strictures they passed at Nupur Sharma whose plea was >> just to consolidate all the cases to one court >> And >> Hiw they turned a blind eye to the provocative and insulting and >> demeaning statements made against Hindu Gods. >> >> They frequently enter into policy domains which is reserved for the Govt. >> >> These fellows are a total disgrace to the civilized society. I hope God >> helps our Nation to get rid of these scoundrels. >> They will sell our Nation and our Religion. >> >> N Sekar >> >> FWD: >> >> *The Chief Justice has written to the Prime Minister asking for further >> increase in the number of judges in the Supreme Court.* >> >> *PM's reply* >> >> *Honorable Judge Saheb, you have the following instructions from the >> public:* >> >> 1:- All you Justices come at 10 o'clock - Lunch -between 2 and 3 >> o'clock, then return home at 4 o'clock. How long will this last?? >> 2:- Come at 9 am and work till 6 pm like doctors, engineers, policemen, >> bureaucrats and people from corporate world. >> 3:- Work on Saturdays and Sundays as many doctors and some officers do. >> 4:- Since 1947, from 1st June to 30th June, you enjoy summer vacation. >> Why summer vacation in June when entire SC is centralized AC ?? >> 5:- Each Justice shall take only 15-20 days leave in a year. >> 6:- Why waste time deliberately in cases like Jallikattu, Dahihandi?? >> 7:- Why are you wasting your time hearing hundreds of useless PILs >> filed by some professionals?? >> 8:- EPFO vs pensioners, why you make 3 justice benches and then 5 >> justice benches in many cases? >> 9:- Review for traitors, then petitions for correction? Why do you >> open the court even at night for the poor people who don't have time ??? >> 10:- You get crores of salary and facilities from tax payers but zero >> accountability to public. >> 11:- You live in AC bungalows, travel in luxury cars, have elaborate >> security at public expense, so why don't you work hard? >> 12:- All of you will get Cabinet Minister facilities. >> >> No need to age. Working days of SC Supreme Court should be increased >> to atleast 300 days which function only 168 days in a year. >> >> Judges should have no difficulty in working for 300 days while the >> Prime Minister can work for 365 days. >> >> The poor patriots could bear it no longer. >> >> *Judiciary is rotten. There is an urgent and urgent need to improve >> it.* >> ^JUDICIAL REFORMS NEED OF THE HOUR^ >> >> *Send at least five groups* >> *some will not send* >> *But I am sure you will definitely send* >> Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer >> <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=NativePlacement&c=Global_Acquisition_YMktg_315_EmailSignatureGrowth_YahooMail:Search,Organize,Conquer&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=Global_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100000945&af_sub5=OrganizeConquer__Static_> >> >> -- >> On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust >> >> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join >> >> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup >> >> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust >> >> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: >> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "KeralaIyers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/1936123849.6082705.1712664192017%40mail.yahoo.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/1936123849.6082705.1712664192017%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thatha_Patty" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooqWmKOV21dH9HJ3iSFDQiPebkmcN3sQAxsLneOtJQRhw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooqWmKOV21dH9HJ3iSFDQiPebkmcN3sQAxsLneOtJQRhw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CABC81ZcChA-75sKyh-7KQbxoqNLQJhUqLH3X1opjYEpLvUN6Cg%40mail.gmail.com.
