Dear folks// Dear all
Whenever confronted with the inescapable truth, the dead and buried
hairless, toothless, witless, unlearned, illiterate, unschooled, uneducated
aachaa-paatti old hag Karuppaayee-paatti K Rajaram ex-IRS 20524 shrieks
from her worm-crawling rotting cadaver six feet below ground, confused and
conflicted in everything she blabbers,
KR Kizhattuppaya RIP and dead already from sinful city pimpS Narayanasamy
(1) As I clarified earlier:- Varana" has nothing to do with "varna".
The Sanskrit word "varanam" means, among other things, begging, soliciting,
requesting, covering, screening, protecting, a rampart, surrounding wall, a
ridge, a tree in general, a camel. "Vara" means best, excellent, most
beautiful or precious, better and preferable, and so on.
The four varnas are fully set out in our vedams as braahmana, kshathriya,
vaishya, and shoodra, who each spring respectively from the various parts
of the body of the original virad-purusha.
It is NEVER a free choice for a new-born baby to choose his or her varna.
The baby follows the varna of its legitimately married parents.
(2) As for the reliance on Skaanda puraanam, I have already pointed out
that a fallible mere human-originated puraanam has no authority to
over-ride our vedams.
(3) Same goes for reliance on the mahaa-bhaaratham, a puraanam written by
illegitimate Vyaasa (whose parents neve married), triple adulterer and
rapist of dead King Vichithraveeryan's two widows Ambikaa and Ambaalikaa,
and the latter's maid-servant, producing respectively illegitimate sons
blind Dritharaashtra, mottled-skin Paandoo, and Vidoora.
KR Hello I had given evidence; so you have rebut with evidence; and not
your ignorance displayed. The absence of evidence from you is lack of
evidence and so crash face down.
(4) Manu Smrithi is no authority for over-riding the clear language of
the vedam regarding the origin, order of precedence, and distinction of the
four varnas.
KR Manu smirithi is not authority, but S Narayanasamy gutter is?
Denial and assertions are negative reasoning succeptible to downfall of
your words Narayana.
(5) As for reliance on Yaajnyavalkya, I have already emphasised that he is
merely a rebel student who was expelled from Veda-school for disruptive
behaviour and gross insubordination. His words are of no consequence.
KR Rebel than you Narayana? At least he wrote something which are there
to follow, by so many; but you are big zero and yet can talk?
(6) "They call the Teacher “father,” on account of his imparting the
Veda."
My comments:-
No. Not at all.
It is the boy's real birth father who imparts the Veda-manthrams to his
son. The "teacher" or "guru" merely acts as a supplementary tutor for the
real father.
KR As I am teaching you you become my prodigal son according to veda.
Verse 2.171: Section XXIX - Meaning of Term ‘Twice-born’
Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath
Jha:
वेदप्रदानादाचार्यं पितरं परिचक्षते ।
न ह्यस्मिन् युज्यते कर्म किञ्चिदा मौञ्जिबन्धनात् ॥ १७१ ॥
vedapradānādācāryaṃ pitaraṃ paricakṣate |
na hyasmin yujyate karma kiñcidā mauñjibandhanāt || 171 ||
They call the Teacher “father,” on account of his imparting the Veda.
Before the tying of the girdle, the performance of no religious act is
proper for him. —(171)
And show me your any authority for your speech from your KYV which has 30%
Rig vedam and 70% procedures only
K Rajaram IRS 20524//21524
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZor_dTYsy4muX5oe6S0p0yiYTJ7Je9vKpo1Xp2sydJd%3DWg%40mail.gmail.com.
