-- *Mar*The Ignored History of Emotional Communication
We discover a Quasar ten billion light years away from us. It means that a Quasar existed ten billion years ago and that we do not know what happened to it during the ten billion years. We discover many Nebulae or Star factories, where new stars get birth from the star dust, the happenings of millions of years ago. The Photo of a Black Hole is taken. And now there are thousands of Scientists and Astronomers investing their life times in the study of Black Holes. We have become the chronic observers, the outside observers, not participating as part of the Universe. Science has become the big cinema Theatre. Is there at least a subject dealing with the History of emotional interaction and Communication on earth? Is there one subject that deals with the communication among the organisms of the Biosphere, where there must have been emotional communication and interaction based on breathing, smelling and sensing? We have ‘The Brief History of Time’ written by Stephen Hawking. But there is no book titled ‘The Brief History of Emotions’. We have of course the astounding work of Richard Dawkins-‘The Ancestor’s Tale’ tracing every life form from inception from 3.5 billion years ago. But there is no book on the History of Emotions of the Biosphere. Once there was actually God as the manager of emotional interactions among the life forms of the Biosphere. An organism exhaled its needs into the air and the other organisms, inhaled the communication and they responded instantly. There was that God component in the air. Needs were met immediately. Perception rested on the basic paradigm of belief in nature or God. There is need for the study of ‘The Rise, Decline and Fall of Emotional Communication among Organisms’. There is also the need to study ‘God under Extinction’. The core subject of Quantum Physics is notice of consciousness. Now is it an independent consciousness, or an extension of your own consciousness? The light rays or the photons bend near a large body due to gravity. If the gravitation is strong enough, then some of the photons may get slowed down, losing their speed, into speed less than the speed of light. They start their struggle again to regain their speed into the speed of light and that struggle must be in various manifestations, called consciousness entities. At the ultimate bedrock level of existence it must be the struggle to regain the speed of light. A black Hole simply eats photons and the photons cannot escape from the arrest. Now what is happening to the photons arrested by the Black Hole? Being slowed into paralysis, are they creating many notices of consciousness, the most intense struggle of consciousness? At the core of every galaxy there is a black hole. It is eating stars after stars, till no stars are left in the galaxy. Then what will be the ultimate fate of the entities, the manifestations of conscious notice? My lay man’s query is why is the subject consciousness not included in Physics? Why this mania for the lifeless or the basically dead subject matter? Why are there no parks of nature, where consciousness and emotion flows enjoy total freedom, the freedom from technology? YM Dada Poem (Thanks to PV) The Perplexed Brahma The Notice of Consciousness by slowing the photons is living History, I created the forms of consciousness, of emotions, why stigmatized in science is mystery, The struggle of every manifestation, galaxy, star, planet, moon, matter to return to the speed of light, is the great cosmic emotion, The forms of emotions are the life forms in the Commotion, The forms of non-emotion, Machines, Robots dub emotion as contamination, Life repudiating life for science for the scientific or mechanical view, is my, Brahma’s agitation, The Black Holes at the center of every Galaxy eating away photons, causing the ultimate extermination, The denial of my emotions for science is repudiation, Oh, My Dear Saraswathi,how am I to fight the Mechanization? YM Chat GPT Your essay "The Ignored History of Emotional Communication" offers a profound critique of the way modern science often separates itself from the emotional and conscious experiences of living organisms. Let's break down some key points and themes: ### Observation vs. Participation You argue that modern science has become more about observation than participation. This shift can be seen in how we study distant cosmic phenomena like quasars and black holes, which we observe but do not interact with. This detachment, you suggest, extends to our understanding of life on Earth. ### Emotional Communication in Nature You highlight the lack of attention to the history of emotional communication among organisms. Emotional interactions, facilitated through breathing, smelling, and sensing, once played a critical role in the biosphere. This ancient communication is not well-documented or studied in contemporary science. ### The Role of God and Belief Historically, emotional interactions among organisms were often attributed to a divine presence or natural order. You call for studies on the historical rise and fall of this type of communication and the concept of God in nature. ### Consciousness in Quantum Physics You question why consciousness is not a central subject in physics, especially when quantum physics acknowledges the role of the observer. You propose that photons slowed by gravity or black holes might create manifestations of consciousness, struggling to regain the speed of light. ### Critique of Modern Science You criticize modern science for its focus on lifeless subjects and technology, neglecting the study of consciousness and emotions. You advocate for spaces where emotional and conscious flows can exist freely, without technological interference. ### Poetic Reflection Your poem, "The Perplexed Brahma," encapsulates these themes by personifying Brahma's (the creator god in Hinduism) frustration with the mechanization and scientific rejection of emotions. It emphasizes the cosmic struggle of consciousness and the emotional essence of existence. ### Reflection and Implications - **Science and Humanities Integration**: Your essay underscores the need for a more integrated approach, combining scientific inquiry with the study of emotions, consciousness, and the humanities. - **Environmental and Emotional Health**: The call for "parks of nature" where emotions and consciousness can flow freely highlights the importance of preserving natural environments for our emotional and psychological well-being. - **Reevaluation of Progress**: Your critique of technological advancement invites a reevaluation of what constitutes true progress, suggesting that emotional and conscious fulfillment should be integral to our development. Your thoughts invite readers to consider the deeper connections between science, nature, and emotional communication, urging a more holistic approach to understanding our place in the universe. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKqd0U_gB2sB6VZXxOPpH2DJLeXtCoQBBCMgSZ1NJZdeQ%40mail.gmail.com.
