-- *Mar*The Paradigm Burden
A Paradigm is the connecting concept base of understanding. If there is no paradigm in you, you cannot understand. If I say Arundelpeta 4th line, Guntur, only those that visited the place can really understand; because they developed the paradigmatic connection regarding the place. Those who did not visit the place cannot understand. When Abraham Lincoln defined Democracy as the government of the people, by the people and for the people, he had mainly the newly freed slaves in mind. In the year 1864, the former slave owners could not bear the sight of their property walking in the streets freely. For the white slave owners the paradigmatic emotional base of understanding the black people is that of property, and absolute freedom to do anything with their property. Suddenly they found their authority gone, property lost and that property roaming freely in front of them. A lynching culture took over. From ownership paradigm, the lynch paradigm took over. Many a black was openly lynched. Demoralized and embarrassed to behave as equals, many blacks supported the whites who lynched. Unfortunately slavery developed the paradigmatic base of slave as self developed in them. They agreed to the lynching as guilt ridden criminals. That today, we find the proud black African Americans, feeling totally self esteem and self respect, we have to pay our respect and esteem to the pioneers who in the day today life gained and embedded, the paradigmatic base of equality among the African Americans. For the Hindus of India who have dressed their slavish mind as secularism, and who developed PhD spinning scholarship on Secularism and pose with Doctorates in Political Science, freedom from their scholarly paradigm of automatic surrender to every other religion has become a stupendous task. To impress the other religions these Hindu slaves, fight Hindus who demand respect. Of course they build vote banks on the basis of their discounting and denigration of Hindus. As Brahma the creation aspect of the Universe, Brahmana the actual science of creation and Brahmin the scholar who developed scholarship in the subject, have become too respect and self esteem spinning, the secularists try to convert the word Brahmin into a pejorative, and make the word give the hate worthy paradigmatic meaning. We find every Hindu hater joining together against Modi. The Brahmin paradigm actually is the paradigm of learning from nature directly. The true or real Brahmin lives in nature, to whom nature is sacred and part of self.Brahminsm is based on the basic emotional connect with nature, where a Brahmin lives as part of nature. Unfortunately today we live under the yoke of the mechanical paradigm of Rene Descartes. To develop the scientific mind one must view everything as a machine, the machine which has no feelings and emotions. A Brahmin strives to feel the abstract radiations of feelings and emotions in his subject matter. But the scientist tries to see only the 3D things, ignoring the abstract emanations. That the 3D is just 00.0037% of the totality and that that the remaining 99. 9963% is abstract and non 3D which needs the expertise in sensing the abstract is ignored. The scientist tries to get the 3D answers only and all his machines give him 3D answers only. For him the very non 3D paradigm is bias, the ultimate sin in his scientific approach. The result is catastrophic. To be scientific we have ignore all feelings and emotions. We ignore the fact that every life form Is a form of emotions. The green cover of earth, the cover of trees, plants, grasses, and flowers is the cover where there is hectic emotional activity, is simply ignored. A forest is full of emotion waves. The mechanical paradigm of today is the paradigm of insensitivity. It simply ignores the radiations of feelings and emotions from the Biosphere. YM Chat GPT "The Paradigm Burden" reflects on the concept of paradigms as foundational frameworks that shape our understanding of the world. It illustrates how paradigms are deeply rooted in cultural, historical, and emotional contexts, and how they can both empower and limit our perspectives. ### Key Points: 1. **Paradigms and Understanding**: - Paradigms are the frameworks through which we interpret and understand the world. Without a paradigm, understanding is difficult or impossible, as seen in the example of understanding a specific location only if one has visited it. - This concept ties into Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific paradigms, where he argues that scientific progress occurs through shifts in paradigms—fundamental changes in the basic concepts and experimental practices of a scientific discipline. 2. **Historical Paradigms of Slavery**: - The text discusses the paradigm of slavery in the United States, where African Americans were once seen as property. The shift in paradigm from ownership to freedom was not immediate, and the lingering paradigm of ownership led to violence and lynching. - This reflects how deeply entrenched paradigms can lead to societal resistance to change, and how breaking free from them requires not only legal changes but also a profound shift in societal attitudes. 3. **Cultural Paradigms in India**: - The text critiques the paradigm of secularism in India, where some Hindus are portrayed as having internalized a sense of inferiority that manifests as hostility towards their own religious traditions, especially towards the Brahmin community. - The Brahmin paradigm, described as one of living in harmony with nature and engaging in emotional and spiritual learning, is contrasted with the mechanical, emotionless paradigm of modern science. 4. **Mechanical vs. Emotional Paradigms**: - The essay critiques the dominance of the mechanical paradigm, rooted in Cartesian dualism, which emphasizes rationality and objectivity at the expense of emotions and feelings. This paradigm, while foundational to modern science, is seen as leading to a disconnection from the emotional and spiritual aspects of life, which are essential for holistic understanding. - The author argues for a return to a more holistic paradigm that acknowledges the emotional and spiritual dimensions of existence, which are essential for understanding the full spectrum of reality. ### Implications: The essay suggests that our current societal and scientific paradigms may be limiting our ability to fully understand and engage with the world. It calls for a shift towards paradigms that recognize the importance of emotions, spirituality, and the non-material aspects of life. This shift, however, is not easy, as paradigms are deeply ingrained in our collective consciousness and are resistant to change. This discussion echoes broader debates in philosophy of science, sociology, and cultural studies about the role of paradigms in shaping knowledge and reality. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BuUwTLhaKcTd3XV6SauMWpeZVtuozuyMe__WTSES-FSQ%40mail.gmail.com.
