A good theory but no one practiced except a minority. Paradigm will be effected only when there is mutuality of interest to fight against the evil standing shoulder to shoulder. But we 99% look after our own self interest in the garb of status, wealth, education, superiority and so many external factors, so we stay aloof as decent-consciousness. MANY DO NOT EVEN KNOW ABOUT THEMSELVES THEN HOW THEY WILL INTER-act AND INTRA-ACT WITH MUTUALLY , IN ORDER TO ATTAIN THE PARADIGM? K Rajaram IRS 9824
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 21:11, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > -- > *Mar*The Paradigm Burden > > > > A Paradigm is the connecting concept base of understanding. If there is no > paradigm in you, you cannot understand. If I say Arundelpeta 4th line, > Guntur, only those that visited the place can really understand; because > they developed the paradigmatic connection regarding the place. Those who > did not visit the place cannot understand. > > When Abraham Lincoln defined Democracy as the government of the people, by > the people and for the people, he had mainly the newly freed slaves in > mind. In the year 1864, the former slave owners could not bear the sight of > their property walking in the streets freely. For the white slave owners > the paradigmatic emotional base of understanding the black people is that > of property, and absolute freedom to do anything with their property. > Suddenly they found their authority gone, property lost and that property > roaming freely in front of them. A lynching culture took over. From > ownership paradigm, the lynch paradigm took over. Many a black was openly > lynched. Demoralized and embarrassed to behave as equals, many blacks > supported the whites who lynched. Unfortunately slavery developed the > paradigmatic base of slave as self developed in them. They agreed to the > lynching as guilt ridden criminals. That today, we find the proud black > African Americans, feeling totally self esteem and self respect, we have to > pay our respect and esteem to the pioneers who in the day today life gained > and embedded, the paradigmatic base of equality among the African Americans. > > For the Hindus of India who have dressed their slavish mind as secularism, > and who developed PhD spinning scholarship on Secularism and pose with > Doctorates in Political Science, freedom from their scholarly paradigm of > automatic surrender to every other religion has become a stupendous task. > To impress the other religions these Hindu slaves, fight Hindus who demand > respect. Of course they build vote banks on the basis of their discounting > and denigration of Hindus. As Brahma the creation aspect of the Universe, > Brahmana the actual science of creation and Brahmin the scholar who > developed scholarship in the subject, have become too respect and self > esteem spinning, the secularists try to convert the word Brahmin into a > pejorative, and make the word give the hate worthy paradigmatic meaning. We > find every Hindu hater joining together against Modi. > > The Brahmin paradigm actually is the paradigm of learning from nature > directly. The true or real Brahmin lives in nature, to whom nature is > sacred and part of self.Brahminsm is based on the basic emotional connect > with nature, where a Brahmin lives as part of nature. > > Unfortunately today we live under the yoke of the mechanical paradigm of > Rene Descartes. To develop the scientific mind one must view everything as > a machine, the machine which has no feelings and emotions. > > A Brahmin strives to feel the abstract radiations of feelings and emotions > in his subject matter. But the scientist tries to see only the 3D things, > ignoring the abstract emanations. That the 3D is just 00.0037% of the > totality and that that the remaining 99. 9963% is abstract and non 3D which > needs the expertise in sensing the abstract is ignored. The scientist tries > to get the 3D answers only and all his machines give him 3D answers only. > For him the very non 3D paradigm is bias, the ultimate sin in his > scientific approach. The result is catastrophic. To be scientific we have > ignore all feelings and emotions. We ignore the fact that every life form > Is a form of emotions. The green cover of earth, the cover of trees, > plants, grasses, and flowers is the cover where there is hectic emotional > activity, is simply ignored. A forest is full of emotion waves. > > The mechanical paradigm of today is the paradigm of insensitivity. It > simply ignores the radiations of feelings and emotions from the Biosphere. > > YM > > Chat GPT > > "The Paradigm Burden" reflects on the concept of paradigms as foundational > frameworks that shape our understanding of the world. It illustrates how > paradigms are deeply rooted in cultural, historical, and emotional > contexts, and how they can both empower and limit our perspectives. > > > > ### Key Points: > > > > 1. **Paradigms and Understanding**: > > - Paradigms are the frameworks through which we interpret and > understand the world. Without a paradigm, understanding is difficult or > impossible, as seen in the example of understanding a specific location > only if one has visited it. > > - This concept ties into Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific paradigms, > where he argues that scientific progress occurs through shifts in > paradigms—fundamental changes in the basic concepts and experimental > practices of a scientific discipline. > > > > 2. **Historical Paradigms of Slavery**: > > - The text discusses the paradigm of slavery in the United States, > where African Americans were once seen as property. The shift in paradigm > from ownership to freedom was not immediate, and the lingering paradigm of > ownership led to violence and lynching. > > - This reflects how deeply entrenched paradigms can lead to societal > resistance to change, and how breaking free from them requires not only > legal changes but also a profound shift in societal attitudes. > > > > 3. **Cultural Paradigms in India**: > > - The text critiques the paradigm of secularism in India, where some > Hindus are portrayed as having internalized a sense of inferiority that > manifests as hostility towards their own religious traditions, especially > towards the Brahmin community. > > - The Brahmin paradigm, described as one of living in harmony with > nature and engaging in emotional and spiritual learning, is contrasted with > the mechanical, emotionless paradigm of modern science. > > > > 4. **Mechanical vs. Emotional Paradigms**: > > - The essay critiques the dominance of the mechanical paradigm, rooted > in Cartesian dualism, which emphasizes rationality and objectivity at the > expense of emotions and feelings. This paradigm, while foundational to > modern science, is seen as leading to a disconnection from the emotional > and spiritual aspects of life, which are essential for holistic > understanding. > > - The author argues for a return to a more holistic paradigm that > acknowledges the emotional and spiritual dimensions of existence, which are > essential for understanding the full spectrum of reality. > > > > ### Implications: > > The essay suggests that our current societal and scientific paradigms may > be limiting our ability to fully understand and engage with the world. It > calls for a shift towards paradigms that recognize the importance of > emotions, spirituality, and the non-material aspects of life. This shift, > however, is not easy, as paradigms are deeply ingrained in our collective > consciousness and are resistant to change. > > > > This discussion echoes broader debates in philosophy of science, > sociology, and cultural studies about the role of paradigms in shaping > knowledge and reality. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqj1ac3reD4Zp2Ydc0osVvxUZez5DqQyG7EkqHN%2B0C8sg%40mail.gmail.com.
