The video read good mathematics rather than real theory of
democracy. Justice could have released his judgement over the plaintiff
as well as the defendant visions whether they are pragmatic and virtual.
Democracy did not start from Greece; whenever India is ignored by the west,
their theory failed and went unnoticed. The mathematical theory of 51 vs
rest 49 could occur only when there are two parties or persons. In
democracy freedom of choice of the personality is encouraged; o majority,
where 10 persons do contend, the mathematical ratio would be only 10% 50%
where each except 2 are getting zero vote, which is against the
preponderance of probability. Thus 30% gets the majority. And this is only
wrt the voted; non-voters stand is unknown. Hence, election should not be
conducted in between the persons, but only between the parties. And
qualification of contest as a group or party shall be defined, say only the
party existed in the last 3 years; then suddenly some money-business-minded
cannot jump into the forum; also as party is mandatory, individuals to
extract money could be avoided. As every post has an alternative, so too,
party must determine 6 months before, the election, must decide, which
party they would support if they were to vote , other than themselves; this
would show their policy , stand, opportunity seeking etc well ahead, to
voters to think. Then where 1 and 2 party ranking in election  is out on
counting, the 3 to nth votes shall be merged with 1 and 2 or non applicable
3rd status. Now we have only 1, 2 and 3 parties out of the election
results.     So the 3rd Random uncertain votes plus non voters reveal the
thoughts of reality of the people. In case 51% of the population is in that
category, of 3rd rank, then that election has only a minority Govt; then
the ruling for the minority winner may form an interim govt for a short
period; this procedure would make it difficult for parties to distribute
money  to such vast numbers. And as only party participate it can be done
by the technology by sitting at home; this would make uninterested voters
vote and use of a citizen Qr code to be used as only once.  And election
prosecutions shall only be conducted by the election commissioners in a
short time. Partiality will prevail but it does apply to all parties who
may return back to power later also. Once prosecuted they cannot hold any
power in the future must become law. The crossed bickering would eliminate
many frauds out of focus. People will know in the course of action repeat
how to vote also. Then Mathematic which was considered may not apply for
Democracy, shall apply as Maths is a good fit in any circumstances.
Majority is always n+1 in mathematics and not 51+49.  K Rajaram IRS 41224
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 19:56
Subject: democracy is dictatorship
To:


Why Democracy Is Mathematically Impossible <https://youtu.be/qf7ws2DF-zk>

Why Democracy Is Mathematically Impossible

<https://youtu.be/qf7ws2DF-zk>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorYR9H85X7b80GJAqhBATXmctZ6s4c58xyJGVgFDkEc-Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to