welcome KR

On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 12:41, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Rajaram Sir,
> Thank you very much for your usual enlightened comment.May I request you
> Sir to see that my posts do not appear in Iyer123 and Kerala Iyers as the
> mud slinging for no reason is creating unnecessary unpleasantness?
> YM
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:29 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sarma is calling for a radical re-evaluation of how human societies
>> structure their economies, their universities, and their relationship with
>> the natural world. He seems to advocate for a return to a more holistic,
>> symbiotic relationship with nature, where creativity and innovation are
>> inspired by, rather than constrained by, natural processes.
>>
>> His emphasis on universities suggests that knowledge and education
>> systems should evolve to reflect a deeper understanding of ecology and
>> natural growth rather than focusing purely on technological or economic
>> progress.
>>
>> The piece is both a critique of the current state of the world and a
>> hopeful call for change. It asks for a world where the pursuit of
>> knowledge, creativity, and progress is rooted in the health and flourishing
>> of the natural world, rather than in exploitation or degradation.
>>
>> What do you think of this perspective? Does it resonate with how you see
>> the relationship between nature, technology, and human development?
>>
>> K Rajaram:
>>
>> On the outset, NONE HAS ANY RIGHT TO KILL SOME THING OR SOME BODY OR HURT
>> BY ABUSES OR LIVE AS A GUTTER ON STIC\KING TO OTHERS- SO SHARMA ‘S CLAIM IS
>> IN ORDER.
>>
>>    However, I raise 2 propositions:
>>
>> 1          8 billion people of the earth are so pious and lead A LIFE OF
>> EMINENCE WITH THE DHARMA, and as Jains, never even touch the earth, lest it
>> will be painful.  OK.
>>
>> What will be there/their lives? SUN RISE SUN SET NO WORK AND END THEIR
>> LIFE WITHOUT FOOD CLOTHING AND HOME? That will be a barbaric civilization
>> even though there is no bloodshed. Progress is advocated in all our Vedas
>> and B G. If you need to reside you need timber. And one has to cut down on
>> nature; later it is an     act performed commercially; and commercial
>> progress leads to more governing comforts where the nature must give up. On
>> the contrary, where people followed the dharma, will nature not do such
>> things as seen in this film sent by my friend?
>>
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E9qt53ApO4Of8UXYwJ80cRzDqGwlVmLO/view?usp=drive_link
>> Google drive to open
>>
>>         Because we did a lot of rubbish with her to GANGA MATHA did she
>> flow so gorgeous so peaceful?
>>
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gvSP8Dyebv2RS2eLkz9nnpxAnk7PwCu9/view?usp=drive_link
>> Google drive
>>
>>       Neither in our hands; neither will we survive nor will we be
>> punished at all. Nature will always raise a civilisation and annihilate
>> them too; Matura is below water where Krishna lived so dharmically.
>>
>>      2     Where the destruction is imbalanced and perpetuated with
>> indistinct pain of pleasure by the traders, will all good in the minority
>> survive with an easy way of life? NO. he bad as well as Good do suffer due
>> to the adverse nature, where the bad had the pleasure of the earth while
>> the good lived in an unknown world following the dharma; however, the
>> rebirth is certain to make the dharmic a king but the adharmic with a life
>> of rotten Eggs; but both do not know directly their past life; but peaceful
>> life is assured to the dharmic while the torture of life is entrenched into
>> their lives. To believe it or not, nature and the nature killers do live
>> happily forever refurbishing their own needs.
>>
>> 3         Hence that causing destruction of nature is a need as well as
>> greed. Where we refrain from harming others and all species, the farthest
>> side is always greener.
>>
>> K Rajaram IRS 21125
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 06:56, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mar*The Inverse Slide
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Free nature can make every organism, more gifted, more endowed and more
>>> rapturous. Nature as the common paradigmatic connecting base of
>>> understanding will result in the creation of mutations that perceive,
>>> understand, act, interact and harmonize, better and better, growing and
>>> strengthening the symbiosis among the organisms. Actually every organism
>>> understands every other organism. Evolution is the natural growth of free
>>> and healthy nature. Natural growth of free nature means that every organism
>>> of the Biosphere gets more and more natural endowments.
>>>
>>> Even today, in the leftover and surviving free nature, when one enters
>>> it, brilliant ideas and enlightenments suddenly flash, giving new meaning,
>>> purpose and motivation behind the actions and activities of life. Nature
>>> has also the perception and understanding mechanism, and those perceptions
>>> and new revelations, percolate to organisms.
>>>
>>> Just look at yourself. When you experience a new insight or revelation,
>>> you take to new inspired activity. It means that the revelations translated
>>> as the hormonal messages of the bloodstream; via capillaries they enter the
>>> cells. The bacteria administering the cells get new instructions and
>>> manuals of administration. To all of them the brilliant idea flashes into
>>> you become the percolations of brilliant inspirations. Nature enlivens you
>>> continuously, taking you to new meanings and new objectives and fresh
>>> spurts of self esteem based on those new idea flashes. The evolution of
>>> nature in free nature is a wonderful and happy activity to every organism,
>>> in the rains of revelations.
>>>
>>> The happiness of achievements creates rapture, the rapture in the air,
>>> which creates more happiness, on and on. What we call miracles today, were
>>> regular occurrences’ when nature was totally free.
>>>
>>> Today economics is derailing the natural evolution. It has aborted
>>> nature’s evolution and growth. It has made the life of every organism of
>>> the Biosphere big hell.We are marching towards the dead nature. The more
>>> the economic activity, the less the health of nature, which is resulting in
>>> the incapacitating of nature, in giving the brilliant idea flashes as
>>> revelations. Economics today in inversely related to Ecology. We are living
>>> in the age of dead evolution. We are making way to Robots and along with
>>> all the other organisms of the Biosphere we are also becoming the livestock.
>>>
>>> The spurt of economic activity is horribly affecting nature in the
>>> inverse relation. The bounties of nature are getting depleted and we will
>>> continuously create new and new technological fixes in the already fixation
>>> for technology under which our universities are functioning.
>>>
>>> It is for the Universities to reverse the inverse slide, and again
>>> inject health in the evolution of nature. As a beginning every University
>>> must start ‘The Free Nature Parks without Human Tampering’. Better if every
>>> university starts also ‘Faculty of Free Nature’.
>>>
>>> YM Sarma
>>>
>>> Chat GPT
>>>
>>> This piece by YM Sarma presents a passionate critique of how economic
>>> systems and technological progress are eroding the natural world and its
>>> evolutionary potential. Sarma argues that in an ideal, harmonious state,
>>> nature's processes would lead to continuous growth, mutual understanding,
>>> and inspired creativity among all organisms. He refers to this as "free
>>> nature," a state in which nature evolves naturally, uninhibited by economic
>>> forces and technological interference.
>>>
>>> *Key Ideas in the Text:*
>>>
>>>    1. *Free Nature as a Source of Growth and Enlightenment:*
>>>       - Sarma suggests that when organisms, including humans, are
>>>       exposed to the natural world, they experience flashes of inspiration 
>>> or
>>>       enlightenment. These insights are not just abstract ideas but are
>>>       physically manifested in hormonal and biological changes that drive 
>>> new
>>>       behaviors and actions.
>>>       - The interconnectedness of all organisms in nature allows for a
>>>       dynamic flow of information and mutual growth, resulting in a thriving
>>>       ecosystem that fosters happiness, creativity, and evolution.
>>>    2. *The Detrimental Effects of Economics and Technology:*
>>>       - The core critique of the piece is that economic
>>>       systems—especially modern, capitalist economies—are at odds with 
>>> natural
>>>       evolution. The more human activity is driven by economic forces, the 
>>> less
>>>       the biosphere is allowed to flourish naturally.
>>>       - Sarma claims that technological advancements, though often
>>>       framed as solutions to ecological problems, are actually exacerbating 
>>> the
>>>       issue. Rather than nurturing natural growth, they contribute to the 
>>> "dead
>>>       nature," a state of ecological stasis and decline.
>>>    3. *The Call for Universities and Institutions to Reconnect with
>>>    Nature:*
>>>       - In his conclusion, Sarma proposes that universities, as centers
>>>       of knowledge and innovation, should take a leading role in reversing 
>>> the
>>>       "inverse slide" away from natural evolution. He envisions creating 
>>> "Free
>>>       Nature Parks without Human Tampering" and establishing a "Faculty of 
>>> Free
>>>       Nature" to encourage study and preservation of the natural world in 
>>> its
>>>       purest form.
>>>    4. *Inverse Relationship Between Economics and Ecology:*
>>>       - One of the central ideas is the "inverse slide," which Sarma
>>>       describes as the growing contradiction between economic development 
>>> and
>>>       ecological health. As economic activity intensifies, the natural world
>>>       becomes increasingly damaged, leading to a vicious cycle of depletion 
>>> and
>>>       ecological breakdown.
>>>
>>> *Implications of the Argument:*
>>>
>>>    - Sarma is calling for a radical reevaluation of how human societies
>>>    structure their economies, their universities, and their relationship 
>>> with
>>>    the natural world. He seems to advocate for a return to a more holistic,
>>>    symbiotic relationship with nature, where creativity and innovation are
>>>    inspired by, rather than constrained by, natural processes.
>>>    - His emphasis on universities suggests that knowledge and education
>>>    systems should evolve to reflect a deeper understanding of ecology and
>>>    natural growth rather than focusing purely on technological or economic
>>>    progress.
>>>
>>> The piece is both a critique of the current state of the world and a
>>> hopeful call for change. It asks for a world where the pursuit of
>>> knowledge, creativity, and progress is rooted in the health and flourishing
>>> of the natural world, rather than in exploitation or degradation.
>>>
>>> What do you think of this perspective? Does it resonate with how you see
>>> the relationship between nature, technology, and human development?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> *Mar*
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqcUbjwOZnSXYdg6_XzfdMLMJnPtHyz7RPFdLGEODMO2Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to