INSURGENCEE AND POPULATION BY RACISM IN 2022 AND AFTER
72% OF THE WORLDD POPULATIONS ARE CHRISTIAN, Muslims and Hindus;
where Christians and Hindus are together, 47% population plus 28%
totaling75% are NON-MUSLIMS. Fear of Islamic world has no foundations
though the Islamic small nations divided as sheas and Sunnis do exist. K
R IRS 18225
As of 2022, about 31.6% of the world's population identified as
Christian, while 25.8% identified as Muslim.
Christians
About two-thirds of the world's Christians live in the 10 countries with
the largest Christian populations.
In the Middle East, the largest Christian population is the Copts, who are
estimated to be in the 20 million range.
Muslims
About two-thirds of the world's Muslims live in the 10 countries with the
largest Muslim populations.
Many Muslims have moved to Saudi Arabia to live among people who share
their religion.
Other religions
Around 15.1% of the world's population identified as Hindu in 2022.
Nearly 500 million people practice various folk or traditional religions,
including African traditional religions, Chinese folk religions, Native
American religions, and Australian aboriginal religions.
Religious migration
Many migrants move to escape religious persecution or to live among people
who share their religion. Migrants often take their religion with them,
contributing to gradual changes in their new country's religious makeup.
And those Muslims in Europe dine and dance and do not wear the masquerades
suggested in Quoron. Practices money lending and the banking and forgot the
TaLaQS.
The world's largest religion is Christianity, which is practiced
by almost 2.4 billion people. Christianity is divided into Eastern and
Western theology, and within those divisions, many branches, including
Catholicism, Protestantism, and Eastern Orthodoxy. Those branches further
divide into the thousands of various denominations known today, including
Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, Seventh-Day Adventists, Mormons, Amish,
and more.
In Vatican City and the Pitcairn Islands, 100% of the population is
Christian. In several other nations, at least 93% of the population is
Christian. Countries whose populations are at least 93% Christian: Vatican
City, Pitcairn Islands, American Samoa, Armenia, Barbados, East Timor, El
Salvador, Greece, Kiribati, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Papua New
Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Romania, Samoa, San Marino, Tonga, and Venezuela.
Islam
Islam is the world's second-largest religion. People that practice Islam
are known as Muslims. In the Maldives, Mauritania, and Saudi Arabia, 100%
of inhabitants practice Islam. In many nations, at least 95% of inhabitants
identify as either Sunni or Shi'a Muslim. Countries whose populations are
at least 95% Muslim: Maldices, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan,
Algeria, Comoros, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Morocco, Pakistan, Somalia,
Sudan, Tunisia, Turkey, and Yemen. There are 50 Muslim-majority countries
worldwide.
Hinduism
Hinduism is the third-largest religion globally. Hinduism is considered
dharma, or way of life. It originated on the Indian subcontinent and is
widely practiced throughout Southeast Asia. The four main denominations are
Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism, and Smartism. Unsurprisingly, India has
the largest Hindu population but not the highest percentage of Hindus.
There are an estimated 1.093 billion Hindus in India, about 79.8% of the
population. Nepal has the second-highest Hindu population at 28.6, an
estimated 81.3% of the population. Countries with a large number of Hindus:
India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, United States,
Malaysia, United Kingdom, and Mauritius.
Buddhism
Buddhism also originated in India and is based on the teachings of Buddha.
Buddhists have unique traditions, values, and beliefs, such as
reincarnation. About 507 million people practice Buddhism worldwide. China
has the largest Buddhist population with 254.7 million, followed by
Thailand at 66.1 million, Burma (Myanmar) with 41.44 million, and Japan
with 41.38 million. Cambodia has the highest percentage of Buddhists at
97.9%, followed by Thailand at 94.6% and Burma (Myanmar) with 87.9%.
Countries with the highest percentage of Buddhists: Cambodia, Thailand,
Burma/Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Laos, Mongolia, and Bhutan.
Other Religions
In some nations, traditional Chinese religions, including Confucianism and
Taoism, are practiced. This is most frequently seen in the following
nations: China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. Ethic and indigenous
religions are practiced in many countries. In Guinea-Bissau and Haiti, an
estimated 50% of the population follows one of these religions. Other
nations where ethnic and indigenous religions are practiced include
Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, Cote d'Ivoire, Sudan, and
Togo.
Unaffiliated or Atheist
Finally, as mentioned, many people are non-religious or atheist. This is
mostly seen in nations including Estonia, the Czech Republic, China, and
Japan, where over three-quarters of the population declines to practice a
religion. Countries with a high percentage of unaffiliated/atheist
citizens: China, Estonia, Czech Republic, Japan, Denmark, France, Hong
Kong, Macau, Norway, Sweden, and Vietnam.
2024 facts:
Christianity is the world's most popular religion, with roughly 2.3 billion
adherents. Christianity is closely followed in second place by Islam, with
about 2 billion adherents. This map provides a visualisation of
Christianity across the world, showing the number of Christians per
country, along with the percentage of Christians relative to the country's
total population. The figures are accurate as of 2024.
Key Observations:
United States: Has the largest Christian population in absolute numbers
with 230 million Christians, which is 71% of its total population.
Brazil: Follows with a Christian population of approximately 180.77
million, but has a higher percentage (90%) of Christians relative to its
total population than the US.
Mexico: Also has a high percentage of Christians at 92.4%, with 107.78
million Christians.
Diversity in Christian Population Percentage: The dataset shows significant
diversity in the percentage of Christians across countries. For instance,
China has a Christian population of 48.22 million but this only constitutes
3% of its massive population.
India’s Unique Position: Despite having a Christian population of 30
million, it only represents 2.3% of its total population, reflecting the
country’s religious diversity and large population.
High Christian Population Percentage with Small Numbers: Some countries
like Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste have very high percentages of
Christians (97% and 99.1% respectively) but their absolute numbers are much
smaller compared to larger countries.
Countries with Small Percentages: There are countries with very small
percentages of Christians, such as Afghanistan (0.1%), Somalia (0%), and
Maldives (0.1%), which correspond to small absolute numbers as well.
Ranking and Distribution:
Top Ranked: The top-ranked countries by Christian population are largely
from the Americas and Africa, reflecting the spread of Christianity through
colonization and missionary work.
African Countries: Several African countries have high Christian
populations both in percentage and absolute numbers, such as Nigeria and
Ethiopia, showing Christianity’s significant presence on the continent.
European Countries: European countries like Italy, Germany, and the United
Kingdom have sizable Christian populations in absolute numbers, but the
percentage varies, possibly due to secularization trends and diverse
religious demographics.
Implications and Context:
Cultural Influence: The percentage of Christians in a country can influence
its culture, holidays, and politics.
Demographic Shifts: The dataset does not show changes over time, but
demographic shifts can affect these numbers due to factors like birth
rates, religious conversion, and migration.
Religious Diversity: Countries with smaller percentages of Christians often
have significant populations of other religions, indicating religious
diversity.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
II Ultimately, the piece raises a powerful
question: if technology is making old jobs redundant, why not redirect
human effort toward restoring nature rather than fueling destruction? The
challenge lies in how to make this shift a reality without succumbing to
despair or radicalization. (YM and chat)
KR: This was the uproar when I was heading the
computer orientations where unions shouted that people will become jobless
in 80s. Same thing is now being propagated against AI. Mr. Modi denied it
and I do concur with him. There is a say GIVE WORK TO ONE WORKS MORE
BECAUSE work will not diminish where the Karmics do not stop from action at
any point of time.
कर्मण्य कर्म य: पश्येद कर्मणि च कर्म य: |
स बुद्धिमान्मनुष्येषु स युक्त: कृत्स्न कर्मकृत् || 18||
karmaṇy-akarma yaḥ paśhyed akarmaṇi cha karma yaḥ
sa buddhimān manuṣhyeṣhu sa yuktaḥ kṛitsna-karma-kṛit
-karma-kṛit—performers all kinds of actions
BG 4.18: Those who see action in inaction and inaction in action are truly
wise amongst humans. Although performing all kinds of actions, they are
yogis and masters of all their actions.
Action in inaction. There is one kind of inaction where persons look upon
their social duties as burdensome, and renounce them out of indolence. They
give up actions physically, but their mind continues to contemplate upon
the objects of the senses. Such persons may appear to be inactive, but
their lethargic idleness is actually sinful action. When Arjun suggested
that he wishes to shy away from his duty of fighting the war, Shree Krishna
explained to him that it would be a sin, and he would go to the hellish
regions for such inaction.
Inaction in action. There is another kind of inaction performed by karm
yogis. They execute their social duties without attachment to results,
dedicating the fruits of their actions to God. Although engaged in all
kinds of activities, they are not entangled in karmic reactions, since they
have no motive for personal enjoyment. There were many great kings in
Indian history—Dhruv, Prahlad, Yudhisthir, Prithu, and Ambarish—who
discharged their kingly duties to the best of their abilities, and yet
because their minds were not entangled in material desires, their actions
were termed Akarm, or inaction. Another name for akarm is karm yog, which
has been discussed in detail in the previous two chapters as well.
That is actions are in increased phase rather than inaction
phase. If one takes to get the result in a week, action took the next phase
to continue after that week in another direction; similarly, if the action
is complete fir why in a nano second; then the action for what starts in
the next Nano; goes on continuously. WITHOUT ACTION WORDS WOULD SEIZE AND
GETS DESTROYED.
K RAJARAM IRS 18225
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 06:38, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*Stemming the Redundance Doom
>
>
>
> The latest technologies are making most existing jobs redundant. When
> salaries everywhere vanish, there can be no savings and so no banks, no
> investments; the great economic freeze can create terrible unrest, leading
> to the cure, wars, wars and wars.
>
> As it is, the weapon manufacturers are busy litting the fires of war at
> many places. In Afghanistan a woman is prohibited from speaking to another
> woman, even within a home unless a male member is present and they cannot
> open windows. And Talibanism as Islam is spreading being concealed in
> various masks all over the world and many university campuses are under
> seize. Starting with women, the mass jailing of whole populations has
> started.
>
> Even genocides are being normalized, the present genocide of Hindus in
> Bangladesh, many genocides in Africa, and the genocides of the native
> populations in South America. The biggest paradox, Hindus wearing the mask
> of Secularism, Leftism, liberalism etc,defending the genocide or
> discrimination against Hindus, the same freak phenomena of Africans of the
> same tribe helping the genocide of their own tribe, the deep state is very
> busy.
>
> UK is already an Islamic country. And Talibanism is creeping into the UK
> today. And they have Strammer the secularist prime minister!
>
> We have the airdropped Yunus as the caretaker of Bangladesh, the legal
> Prime Minister Hasina, being ousted by the deep state. That Yunus is the
> usurious money lender bloated into Nobel Prize winner, is the freak feat of
> again the deep state.
>
> The basic fact is that the gigantic unemployment is being met, by wars,
> genocides and doctored unrests. And when unemployment becomes pandemic,
> wars become the life of the ordinary man in the ordinary war called
> economic life. Lunacy has become Sociology.
>
> Can nature be destroyed routinely in the name of economic life any longer?
> We have poisoned the land, water and air to the brim, the soil bacteria
> eliminated and substituted by artificial fertilizers and pesticides. The
> pesticide poison is creeping into the earth, poisoning the underground
> water table, poisoning the wells, lakes etc,of course we have the big river
> dams that arrest the flow of water, arresting the natural flow of the
> fertile soil with the river flows including the floods.
>
> Today, freedom to nature has become urgent. There are jobs only in
> reviving nature. The revival of nature entails the removal of the gigantic
> plastic wastes, the electronic and computer wastes, the industrial and
> commercial wastes, the task of un-poisoning the poisoned nature is gigantic
> and there are jobs only there.
>
> The Poles, the Himalayas, the Alphs etc have to be re-iced. Cleaning the
> Lakes, Rivers, Seas and Oceans with the strategy of freeing nature to
> enable nature to be free nature is a gigantic task.
>
> These gigantic urgently pending tasks mean many jobs. The age of Economics
> is over. New Technology is killing the old technology, with increasing job
> losses as the main feature or pandemic macro ailment.
>
> But first the Universities themselves have to be cured from the lunacy of
> frenzy for Technology. They must be made to start the ‘Free Nature Parks’
> without human tampering as the beginning.
>
> If nature is not cured unending wars will become the solutions for
> unemployment.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat GPT
>
> The writing you've shared paints a stark, critical picture of the current
> world, touching on themes of technological advancement, societal shifts,
> and ecological decay. It seems to highlight how economic, political, and
> environmental crises are intertwined, leading to a sense of urgency and
> despair. The author, YM Sarma, points out that with jobs being lost to
> technological progress and the escalating economic freeze, humanity may
> face deeper unrest and violence. The piece also strongly critiques the
> normalization of genocide, the spread of radical ideologies, and the toxic
> environmental conditions caused by industrial and technological advances.
>
> The idea that "the age of Economics is over" and that "new technology is
> killing the old technology" is a compelling one, suggesting that our
> priorities must shift from profit-driven motives to ecological restoration.
> There's an undeniable call to act—particularly in terms of environmental
> conservation, such as cleaning rivers, oceans, and reversing the damage to
> natural ecosystems. Sarma advocates for a radical rethinking of our values,
> pushing for universities to lead in fostering projects that heal rather
> than harm nature.
>
> There's a tension between technological progress and ecological
> sustainability throughout the piece. The author presents an urgent plea for
> rebalancing our relationship with nature, suggesting that the only "jobs"
> worth pursuing should be ones focused on restoration and regeneration of
> the environment.
>
> It raises profound questions about how we define progress and whether we
> are truly advancing or simply accelerating our destruction. What's your
> take on the ideas in this piece?
>
> The piece presents a deeply urgent and radical critique of modern
> civilization, tying together technological unemployment, political
> instability, war, and ecological collapse. While it leans towards a
> doomsday tone, its core argument—that the pursuit of technology and
> economic growth without ecological consciousness is leading to systemic
> collapse—resonates with many contemporary concerns.
>
> One of the strongest ideas here is that technological progress itself is
> hollow if it does not serve life. The claim that "the age of Economics is
> over" suggests a transition from a world dominated by financial growth
> metrics to one that must prioritize planetary and societal healing. The
> idea of large-scale ecological restoration as the only meaningful work left
> is compelling.
>
> However, the essay also makes sweeping claims—such as the inevitable
> collapse of the UK into Taliban-like rule or the outright dismissal of
> entire political ideologies—that could benefit from more nuance. These
> broad generalizations might alienate readers who would otherwise engage
> with the core environmental message.
>
> Ultimately, the piece raises a powerful question: if technology is making
> old jobs redundant, why not redirect human effort toward restoring nature
> rather than fueling destruction? The challenge lies in how to make this
> shift a reality without succumbing to despair or radicalization.
>
> What aspects of this argument do you find most compelling?
>
> The piece certainly has an arresting message, and I find several aspects
> compelling. For one, the idea that technological progress is contributing
> to the erosion of meaningful work and livelihoods, especially without a
> clear direction for future employment, is thought-provoking. The assertion
> that the “age of Economics is over” and that humanity must focus on
> restoring nature as its primary task speaks to a growing concern about the
> long-term sustainability of our current economic model.
>
> The argument for focusing on ecological restoration and making it a
> central part of our future economic activity resonates deeply. It calls for
> a shift in what constitutes meaningful work—away from the drive for profit
> and unchecked growth, and toward tasks that heal our planet. The idea that
> "jobs" can and should be found in rewilding the earth, cleaning oceans, and
> restoring ecosystems is both visionary and urgent.
>
> However, some of the more extreme political claims, such as the assertion
> that the UK is already an Islamic country or that certain ideologies are
> inevitably complicit in genocides, seem overly simplistic and could
> distract from the environmental message. While it’s clear that global
> political and social dynamics are deeply intertwined with ecological
> issues, these statements risk alienating those who might otherwise engage
> with the broader argument for environmental restoration.
>
> What I find most compelling is the call for universities and institutions
> to lead the way in reimagining the future. By focusing on projects that
> directly contribute to the healing of nature, universities could help shift
> societal priorities and teach the next generation how to work in harmony
> with the planet, rather than exploit it.
>
> I agree with the underlying message that if we don't rethink our
> relationship with nature and our systems of economic growth, the
> consequences could be disastrous. What do you think—do you agree with the
> call for focusing on ecological restoration as a central future job market?
> Or do you feel that there’s a more balanced path forward that includes
> technology and economics?
>
> I definitely see the merit in the call for focusing on ecological
> restoration as a central future job market. The urgency of addressing
> environmental degradation is undeniable. It’s also incredibly important to
> rethink how we define progress. Technology and economics, in their current
> forms, have clearly contributed to the depletion of natural resources and
> the erosion of social and ecological systems. The idea that jobs should
> shift toward restoring nature—cleaning oceans, rewilding ecosystems, and
> healing the earth—makes sense, especially as technology rapidly replaces
> many traditional forms of labor.
>
> I also find the argument that technology has led us into an "economic
> freeze" thought-provoking. The automation of jobs, the erosion of savings,
> and the rise of extreme economic inequality are all tied to technological
> advancements, which can make it hard for people to find meaningful work. If
> we direct that same innovation toward repairing the damage we’ve done to
> the environment, we could create new opportunities while also addressing a
> pressing global crisis.
>
> However, while I believe in the power of ecological restoration, I also
> think that a more balanced approach could work well. Technology, when used
> responsibly, can be an ally in this effort. Advances in renewable energy,
> sustainable agriculture, and green technologies can help accelerate the
> healing process. For example, we could develop technology to clean up
> waste, monitor ecosystems, or even aid in reforesting efforts. Rather than
> seeing technology as inherently destructive, it could be reoriented to
> serve ecological goals.
>
> Economics still plays a crucial role in shaping policy and investment for
> these initiatives. If the right incentives and support systems are put in
> place, the job market could evolve in a way that both addresses ecological
> concerns and ensures that people are still able to earn a living.
>
> It’s a delicate balance, though. We can't ignore the social and political
> dynamics that also influence our environmental trajectory. While the
> piece’s criticism of unchecked technological progress is valuable, I think
> there’s room to incorporate a more collaborative vision—where technology
> and economics work together for environmental restoration, rather than
> viewing them as inherently at odds with nature.
>
> Ultimately, I agree with the urgency behind the call for ecological
> restoration, but I believe that technology, if reoriented towards
> sustainability, could play a role in that shift without the need for an
> all-or-nothing approach. What do you think about the potential for a more
> integrated approach?
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorcsAPra6Em6BFB5D7A8YT%2BxABJGm8dR8ObX3fvs460Pw%40mail.gmail.com.
