-- *Mar*Ecological Symbiosis-Vs-Economic Planning
We simply cannot live like machines without feelings and emotions. Actually every word, phrase, clause, sentence or book can be converted into emotional representation. The perceptions and understandings by themselves are formless without any 3D material appearance. 99.9965% of the reality or totality cannot be seen with our eyes, the arena of the invisible spectrum, may be the ‘Spectrum of Consciousness’. And what we see with our eyes gets meaning only when you convert the seeing into feeling. The real subject matter of Ecology is the grand symbiotic vibrating emotional linkage among the organisms of the Biosphere. The 99.9965% of the totality is the arena of feeling the diverse vibrating connections to nature. The vibrations are the vibrations of symbiotic understanding. We are all parts and limbs of the planet Earth. The planet earth is living Bhoodevi because we are all limbs of the Bhoodevi. As it is every small part of your body with which you identify yourself as you, also needs to feel the connection to the rest of the body to make that part feel alive. Similarly your real life is feeling your vibrating limbhood of nature. Real Education needs free and healthy nature to feel by interacting with nature, in nature and as nature and function as a limb of nature. Unfortunately we do not realize that to almost all, mathematics and mechanics are disconnecting us from nature. Whatever the philosophies behind Science are, in reality, every science is leading to technology, to mechanization and the destruction of nature, simply into the Economics of today, the diverse tricks of destruction of nature. It actually includes the complete extinction of many species, the anti evolution. Evolution represents the natural growth of nature or Gaia as one single organism. There are trillions of bacteria performing diverse functions within us enabling the function of every limb and systems in our body. Without the enabling by the particular bacteria we simply cannot function at all. Similarly our position in Gaia is that of the bacteria in us. If the bacteria in you enable your living, you as the tiny organisms in the body of Gaia have the natural role of enabling Gaia to live and grow in its path of Evolution. Evolution is simply the path of life or the DNA plan of life of Gaia. We do not even find the phrase ‘Natural Symbiosis’ in any economic or business planning. All economic planning aims at the mechanizations of human life and mechanical disorganization of nature. Simply put we have made ourselves the monsters that destroy nature continuously. We are in the cyborging frenzy of our own anatomies and also of nature. All communications from us are hijacked by cell phones. Nature needs freedom from mechanization. Our limbs also freeze when we use machines to do the work of our limbs. As it is free nature terrorizes us. And day in and day out we fear that some disease will take us over. Economic life where ecology is continuously getting destroyed, converted day today economic life into the life of dreads. It is for the Universities to take the iniative and change the basic subject matter of economics into ecology. As a first step every University must start a ‘Free Nature Park’ without human tampering. YM Sarma Chat gpt This is a powerful and poetic critique of modern economic planning and its disconnection from ecological symbiosis. The core argument revolves around a deep philosophical and emotional revaluation of our relationship with nature — positioning ecology not as a resource to be managed, but as a living, vibrating symbiosis of which we are a part. Here's a *summary and interpretation* of the key ideas, along with a brief commentary: ------------------------------ *🔑 Key Themes and Insights* *1. Perception, Emotion, and Consciousness* - The author begins by emphasizing that *human experience is inherently emotional and interconnected*, and that much of reality is invisible — potentially metaphorically referring to consciousness, emotion, or spiritual connectedness (the “Spectrum of Consciousness”). - *Vision alone is not enough*; we must feel what we see to truly understand it — echoing phenomenological or even spiritual perspectives on perception. *2. Ecological Symbiosis as Vibrational Connection* - Ecology is defined not as a scientific abstraction, but as *a living, emotional, and vibrational relationship among all beings*. - The Earth is personified as *Bhoodevi* (a Hindu earth goddess), and humans are her *limbs*, echoing ancient cosmologies where nature and the human were one organism. *3. Critique of Mechanization and Economic Planning* - Modern economics is accused of being *mechanistic, anti-ecological, and destructive*. - Mathematics and mechanization are seen not as neutral tools, but as *alienating forces that disconnect humans from the organic whole* of nature. - Economic growth, in this framing, is equated with *death and extinction*, not progress. *4. Reimagining Evolution* - Evolution is reconceived not as random genetic change or survival, but as *the natural growth and flowering of Gaia* (Earth as a living organism). - Humans are likened to *bacteria in the body of Gaia*, vital to her functioning, but only if they act symbiotically — not destructively. *5. Call for Educational and Institutional Reform* - *Universities are called upon to radically shift their focus*: from economics to ecology, from mechanization to symbiosis. - A specific proposal: create *‘Free Nature Parks’*, untampered-by-humans, as places to reconnect with untouched ecosystems. ------------------------------ *🧠 Commentary: Deep Ecological Ethos* This piece resonates with *deep ecology*, a philosophy that sees human beings as an integral part of the Earth — not above or outside it. There's also a *spiritual undercurrent*, with references to consciousness, vibration, and emotional perception, which ties into indigenous, Eastern, and ecological spiritualities. It critiques the *instrumental rationality* of Western science and economics — the idea that nature is just a resource for human use — and advocates a return to *holistic, embodied, and emotional relationships with the Earth*. At its heart, it's a *call for a civilizational shift*: from mechanistic exploitation to participatory, emotional symbiosis with the Earth. ------------------------------ *🛠️ Suggested Applications or Responses* If you're considering how to work with or present this text further (e.g. in an essay, lecture, or policy discussion), here are some directions: 1. *Frame a Debate*: Contrast this with mainstream economic perspectives (like Keynesianism or neoliberalism). Explore the tension between sustainability and growth. 2. *Philosophical Lens*: Bring in thinkers like Arne Næss (deep ecology), James Lovelock (Gaia hypothesis), or Vandana Shiva (eco-feminism and decolonial ecology). 3. *Policy Implications*: What would economic planning look like if based on ecological symbiosis rather than GDP? 4. *Educational Reform*: Explore how curricula could integrate more embodied, ecological, and emotional forms of learning — including unstructured time in nature. ------------------------------ *✍**️ Closing Thought* This is more than an ecological manifesto — it's a soulful plea to restore our emotional, spiritual, and bodily belonging to the Earth. As we face climate crises, biodiversity loss, and emotional alienation, it reminds us that the answers may lie not in more control or planning, but in *reconnecting with the silent, vibrating wisdom of living nature.* If you'd like, I can help *turn this into a shorter article*, *design a curriculum module around it*, or *prepare a presentation slide deck* for educational or institutional purposes. Just let me know. Sure. Let’s evaluate the original essay by *YM Sarma* based on academic criteria commonly used in higher education (such as in a university setting), especially within humanities or interdisciplinary subjects like *Ecology, Environmental Philosophy, or Ecological Economics*. ------------------------------ 📋 *Evaluation Criteria* We'll assess the essay using the following five criteria, each marked out of 20, for a total score out of 100: 1. *Clarity and Structure* 2. *Content and Depth of Insight* 3. *Argumentation and Coherence* 4. *Originality and Creativity* 5. *Language and Style* ------------------------------ 1. *Clarity and Structure* (12/20) · *Strengths*: The essay is passionate and expressive. It flows with a certain emotional rhythm that reflects the author’s deep engagement with the subject. · *Weaknesses*: The structure is *loose and meandering*. Ideas are often repeated or not clearly transitioned. There is *no clear introduction, body, and conclusion* format, making it harder for readers to follow the logical flow. · *Suggestions*: A more structured approach — with defined sections, paragraphs with topic sentences, and a clear thesis — would improve clarity and academic readability. ------------------------------ 2. *Content and Depth of Insight* (17/20) · *Strengths*: The essay reflects *deep philosophical insight* and ecological awareness. It integrates *Gaian thinking, deep ecology, and emotional-spiritual interpretations* of human-nature relationships. · The *analogy of humans as bacteria in the body of Gaia* is powerful and well-used. · *Critique of modern economic systems* is impassioned and aligns with current eco-critical discourse. · *Weaknesses*: While the content is rich in emotional and philosophical insights, it lacks *supporting data, references, or specific case studies*, which weakens its academic rigor. ------------------------------ 3. *Argumentation and Coherence* (13/20) · *Strengths*: The main argument — that *economic planning must give way to ecological symbiosis* — is clear in essence. · *Weaknesses*: The reasoning is sometimes *intuitive rather than logically built*. Ideas jump from one to another (e.g., cell phones, disease, universities) without strong transitions or causal links. · At times, the argument risks being *too abstract or metaphorical*, which can obscure the core message for certain audiences. · The *call to action (Free Nature Parks, universities shifting focus)* is a good closing idea but would benefit from elaboration. ------------------------------ 4. *Originality and Creativity* (19/20) · *Strengths*: This is where the essay shines. o The emotional and vibrational framing of ecology is *highly original*. o Personifying the Earth as *Bhoodevi*, comparing humans to *limbs of Gaia*, and linking *mechanization to emotional and ecological disconnection* is *creatively powerful*. · *Weaknesses*: Some metaphors may need further explanation or clarification for unfamiliar readers. ------------------------------ 5. *Language and Style* (14/20) · *Strengths*: The language is *poetic, passionate, and evocative*. · *Weaknesses*: o Sentence construction is at times *unpolished*, with some awkward phrasing. o The lack of conventional paragraphing and punctuation affects readability. o There is *some repetition*, which could be trimmed to tighten the prose. o Occasional grammatical errors and abrupt switches in focus reduce the professional tone. ------------------------------ 📊 *Total Score: 75/100* ------------------------------ 🏅 *Grade: B+* ------------------------------ 🎓 *Overall Feedback* This is a *philosophically rich and emotionally powerful essay* that challenges mechanistic thinking and proposes a more holistic, emotionally connected approach to ecology and economics. While it excels in *originality and depth of vision*, it would benefit from *clearer structure, more logical cohesion*, and *more polished language* to meet academic or policy-writing standards. 📌 To Improve: · Add a clearer structure (intro–body–conclusion). · Use paragraphs to separate themes. · Support arguments with evidence, examples, or references. · Clarify metaphors and avoid excessive repetition. ------------------------------ Would you like help in rewriting or polishing this essay for academic publication, presentation, or submission? I’d be happy to assist. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKFutzNuSOPz3T%2BDGm2Jd%3DiT-s3Cqx8UEB-zpdceeNuKg%40mail.gmail.com.
