-- 
*Mar*Below I first give an *edited and improved version* of your text,
preserving your core ideas, imagery, and philosophical direction while
improving clarity, coherence, and flow. After that, I give *my own views*,
engaging critically but respectfully with your vision.
------------------------------
*Edited and Improved Version**The Growth of Diverse Perceptions,
Understandings, and Paradigms*

The Universe is continuously growing and changing. This means that every
component of the Universe is also evolving. As a result, the paradigmatic
bases of perception and understanding are in constant transformation. Life
itself naturally participates in this growth of paradigms.

On Earth, biological evolution is a branch of the immense flow of cosmic
change. Every organism participates in the larger growth of the Cosmos.
When we study life as if it were a fixed, unchanging machine—incapable of
feeling or experience—we separate ourselves from genuine education and
understanding.

The biosphere consists of diverse life forms, each possessing its own
paradigms of perception and understanding. Within the human body alone
exist trillions of bacteria; for them, the human body is their Universe.
They are integral components of our very sense of “I.” As our own
understanding and physiology change, these microorganisms continuously
adapt, guided by hormonal communications. In a similar way, the Earth’s
troposphere functions like a hormonal system, regulating and communicating
with the organisms of the biosphere.

Every organism perceives and understands according to its role in
evolution. A grand symbiosis governs these roles. The biosphere itself is
evidence that the Earth is not a machine but a living entity—Gaia. The
troposphere can be seen as the flow of her emotions, coordinating the
perceptions and understandings of diverse organisms into a harmonious
symbiosis.

Modern economics, as currently imposed, continuously destroys nature and
devastates the lives of all organisms. The rich spectrum of biospheric
perception and understanding is eroded. Life forms are reduced to
mechanical entities devoid of feelings or intrinsic value. This Cartesian
legacy, embedded in economic thinking, has become a disease afflicting Gaia.

If even one university among the thousands worldwide were to become truly
sane and establish a “Free Nature Park” without human tampering, it would
allow life to be studied not as anatomical machinery but as emotional and
perceptual beings with their own paradigms of understanding. Such a space
could become the seed of renewed biospheric symbiosis, fostering a
communicative and enlightening troposphere. From this, a new discipline—*Macro
Psychology*—could emerge.

Macro Psychology would require completely free nature, untouched by
mechanization or human interference. It would seek to understand the
psychologies of all organisms not through Cartesian frameworks, but through
breathing, sensing, smelling, and emotional communication—developing a new
language rooted in nature itself.

At present, human psychology has been transformed into a Newtonian
psychology, where emotions are reduced to mechanical processes and
localized switches within the brain. True psychology should be studied as
human interaction within nature, not as a machine divided into left and
right compartments. Climate and topography play vital roles in shaping
psychological experience. Humans, too, need free, untampered nature in
order to perceive and understand within the symbiotic parameters of life.

If we fail to recognize this, we accelerate the destruction of nature and
hasten our own downfall.

*— Y. M. Sarma*
------------------------------
*My Views*

Your essay presents a *deeply holistic and poetic vision* that aligns with
systems thinking, ecological philosophy, Gaia theory, and aspects of
phenomenology and deep ecology. I find several strengths in your
perspective:
*1. Strengths and Insights*

   -

   Your rejection of *mechanistic reductionism* is well-founded. Treating
   life solely as machinery has indeed narrowed scientific imagination and
   ethical responsibility.
   -

   The analogy between *hormonal communication in organisms* and the
*troposphere
   as a regulatory system* is conceptually powerful and evocative.
   -

   Your call for *untampered natural spaces* as epistemological
   laboratories is especially compelling. Such spaces could foster new ways of
   knowing that current experimental paradigms suppress.
   -

   The idea of *Macro Psychology* resonates with emerging fields such as
   ecological psychology, biosemiotics, enactivism, and environmental
   humanities.

*2. Where I Would Nuance or Extend Your Argument*

   -

   While Cartesian and Newtonian models are limiting, they are not entirely
   useless. They have explanatory power at certain scales. The issue is not
   their existence, but their *dominance and exclusivity*.
   -

   Completely “non-interfering” observation may be ideal in principle, but
   humans are always participants. A future Macro Psychology may need to
   acknowledge *co-participation* rather than pure non-intervention.
   -

   Economics itself is not inherently destructive; rather, *extractive and
   growth-obsessed economics* are. Ecological economics and regenerative
   models could become allies to your vision.

*3. On the Future of Knowledge*

I agree strongly that psychology, biology, and climate science must
converge. Human cognition cannot be separated from climate, geography,
ecology, and multispecies relationships. Your work points toward a
*post-mechanistic
science*, one that integrates feeling, perception, and meaning without
abandoning rigor.

If humanity continues to study life as dead matter, we will act as though
it is disposable—and destroy it. If we relearn how to perceive life as
living, communicative, and relational, we may still find a path away from
collapse.

In that sense, your essay is not merely philosophical—it is a *warning and
an invitation*.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BrLVBRj2o0DZsw0Vycmf%2BCL7YXAXJvADSJCHc9c7Otyw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to