Rajaram Sir,
You are defending the Cartesian catastrophe that is destroying nature,which
is euphemized as education and hijacked every University.
YMS

On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 8:33 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> “Without education alone, a nation cannot arise (or rise)
>
>
>
> A nation cannot truly rise or develop without education because education
> is the foundation of progress. It shapes people’s thinking, skills, and
> values, which are essential for national growth.
>
> First, education creates skilled human resources. Doctors, engineers,
> teachers, scientists, and administrators are all products of education.
> Without educated citizens, a nation cannot build industries, improve
> technology, or provide quality services. An uneducated population limits
> productivity and slows economic development.
>
> Second, education promotes good governance and democracy. Educated
> citizens understand their rights and responsibilities. They can question
> injustice, choose good leaders, and participate meaningfully in national
> decision-making. Without education, people are more vulnerable to
> manipulation, corruption, and poor leadership, which weakens a nation.
>
> Third, education encourages social development and unity. It teaches
> tolerance, discipline, and respect for diversity. Education reduces social
> problems like crime, poverty, and inequality by creating awareness and
> opportunities. A society without education often struggles with
> superstition, conflict, and backward traditions.
>
> Finally, education drives innovation and national competitiveness. In a
> globalized world, nations compete through knowledge, research, and
> creativity. Countries that invest in education advance faster, while those
> that neglect it remain dependent on others.
>
> Education is not the only factor in nation-building, but without
> education, no nation can truly rise. It is the backbone of economic growth,
> political stability, and social progress. A nation that ignores education
> risks stagnation and decline.
>
>         Kerala has achieved high levels of literacy and education, but
> economic advancement requires more than education alone. Kerala’s education
> system has focused mainly on general education and social awareness rather
> than technical and industrial training. The state also faces geographical
> limitations such as limited land availability and environmental
> sensitivity, which restrict large-scale industrial development. In
> addition, strong labor unions and higher wage expectations sometimes
> discourage private investment. A large number of educated Keralites migrate
> to other states and foreign countries in search of better employment,
> leading to a brain drain. This means that the benefits of education are
> not fully used within the state. On the other hand, some less-educated
> states have focused more on manufacturing, infrastructure, and industrial
> investment. However, Kerala performs better than most states in health,
> life expectancy, and overall human development. Thus, Kerala proves that
> education improves quality of life, but economic growth also needs
> industrial and policy support.
>
>            “Why Education Does Not Automatically Lead to Good Economics”
>
> We are often told a simple story:
>
> Get educated, and economic prosperity will follow.
>
> More colleges, more degrees, more growth.
>
> But today, I want to question this assumption.
>
> Education does not automatically correlate with good economics.
>
> This statement may sound uncomfortable—but it is necessary.
>
> Education Raises Potential, Not Guaranteed Outcomes
>
> Education gives us knowledge, credentials, and confidence.
>
> But economics depends on productivity, opportunity, and institutions.
>
> Across the world—and especially in developing countries—we see:
>
> Highly educated youth who are unemployed or underemployed
>
> Degrees that do not match job requirements
>
> Rising frustration despite years of schooling
>
> If education alone created prosperity, graduate unemployment would not
> exist.
>
> The Problem of Degree-Centered Thinking
>
> We have slowly confused education with certificates.
>
> Degrees multiply, but skills often do not.
>
> Jobs demand experience, adaptability, and problem-solving—while many
> educations systems reward memorization.
>
> As a result:
>
> Education becomes inflationary
>
> Degrees lose economic value
>
> Youth feel betrayed by a system that promised success
>
> Education that does not translate into real capability cannot sustain a
> strong economy.
>
> Institutions Matter More Than Classrooms Alone
>
> Economists point out that strong economies depend on:
>
> Rule of law
>
> Innovation
>
> Entrepreneurship
>
> Efficient markets
>
> Without these:
>
> Educated people migrate
>
> Talent is wasted
>
> Knowledge remains unused
>
> History gives us clear examples:
>
> Societies with brilliant scholars but weak institutions failed to convert
> learning into prosperity.
>
> Swami Vivekananda Saw This Clearly
>
> Long before modern economists, Swami Vivekananda warned us:
>
> “Education which does not help the common mass of people to equip
> themselves for the struggle for life is not education.”
>
> He did not reject education—he rejected empty education.
>
> He believed true education must:
>
> Build character
>
> Create strength
>
> Enable self-reliance
>
> In today’s language, Vivekananda argued for productive human capital, not
> mere certification.
>
> When Education Does Support Good Economics
>
> Let me be clear:
>
> This is not an argument against education.
>
> Education contributes to good economics only when:
>
> It aligns with industry and innovation
>
> It values skills along with theory
>
> It encourages entrepreneurship and creativity
>
> It is supported by strong institutions
>
> When education meets opportunity, economics flourishes.
>
> Education is necessary, but it is not sufficient.
>
> A nation does not grow rich simply by producing graduates.
>
> It grows when education becomes useful, relevant, and empowering.
>
> As students, our task is not just to earn degrees, but to develop:
>
> Skills that create value
>
> Minds that think independently
>
> *Courage to build, not just apply*
>
> Only then will education truly correlate with good economics.
>
>        Hence even without education any nation may advance; but with
> proper fame of minds and thought process applying all together, and
> sponging on Govt and companies but throwing their real worth contributions
> alone nation becomes colorful in economics.
>
> K RAJARAM IRS  24126
>
> On Sat, 24 Jan 2026 at 05:08, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mar*
>>
>> Real Education-Vs-Economic Education
>>
>> Real Education is experience. It is participation in nature as nature.
>> Lessons are felt. One partners with nature as a limb of nature. The freer,
>> healthier, the luxuriance and the prolific the flora and the fauna, the
>> greater the educating experience. Every organism acts, reacts and interacts
>> with each other including you, filling the troposphere with the lessons
>> filled air. Your five senses, your Panchangams coordinate and join nature
>> creating them as parts of the great macro flow of education.
>>
>> A limb needs every other limb to be healthy and active and responsive. As
>> a limb of nature you need the free and healthy nature to experience
>> education. As a healthy limb in the healthy nature, perception and
>> understanding becomes automatic and reflexive.
>>
>> Suppose with your eyes you can see everything, atoms, particles,
>> molecules, their interactions and participations, actually see the
>> Microcosm functioning. Then you enter the arena of the foundation of
>> quantum physics ending up with the generation of diverse consciousness. It
>> will be difficult to locate yourself as ‘the you’, as diverse experiences
>> overlap. You confront yourself as processes.
>>
>> Now suppose a University starts a ‘Free Nature Park’ without any
>> tampering whatever and allows total freedom to nature. Suppose a few
>> students, overcoming the urban fear of free nature, accept that nature has
>> the basic and fundamental right for freedom, enter that forest. The
>> University of course will not leave them from some bond to some of its
>> courses based on cartesianism and economic orientation.Today, every course
>> in every university strives for economic fitness so that its students
>> become employable in some business or industrial unit. Every economic
>> activity of course harms nature.
>>
>> Now these students despite the long rope of the economics oriented course
>> round their neck, find natural education evolving in them. That evolution
>> of education from nature comes into direct conflict with the course for
>> which they entered into the university. Freedom to nature becomes part of
>> their internal hormonal communication of their bloodstream; education from
>> the free nature enters their blood circulation.
>>
>> They experience the conflict between economics and nature’s ecology. The
>> Economics oriented course demands that they become Mr Hyde. But nature
>> trains them to be Dr Jekyll. They find that they have to confront the
>> majority all Hydes.
>>
>> The Jekylls have one advantage, nature partners with them as they know
>> how to be the limb of nature, unlike the Hydes whose connection to nature
>> is cut by economics and who have to participate in the Darwinian Socialism.
>> The Ecologist Dr Jekyll in them fights the Darwinian Socialism of Mr Hyde
>> in them, the case of two persons occupying one physical body.
>>
>> If the Jekylls win, then nature wins. But if the Hydes win nature dies
>> and Hydes too die with nature. As it is the Hydes are participating in mass
>> suicide via economics.
>>
>> YM Sarma
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Thatha_Patty" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJh8Ln813xfcqF2zw-H23t0gE64EvyM%3Di6i4y1CMuFQdw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJh8Ln813xfcqF2zw-H23t0gE64EvyM%3Di6i4y1CMuFQdw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
*Mar*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJ7p03i21386QHQJa1yEoPuJy%2BkpHObCN9HbaFkN%3DSWxg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to