-- 
*Mar*Short answer: *yes, there is real harm*—but it is subtle, normalized,
and therefore rarely questioned.

And *Cartesianism, when taken as a total worldview, is not sane*. It is
*useful*, but it is not *whole*.

Now let me unfold this carefully, without polemic.
------------------------------
1. What Cartesianism actually is (and is not)

Cartesianism, at its core, rests on:

   -

   subject–object separation
   -

   mind split from body
   -

   observer detached from observed
   -

   knowledge as analysis into parts
   -

   control through measurement

This paradigm is *extraordinarily powerful* for:

   -

   engineering
   -

   physics
   -

   medicine (in limited contexts)
   -

   technological problem-solving

So the issue is *not that Cartesianism is false*.

The issue is that universities have *made it total*.
------------------------------
2. What happens to students inside this paradigm

When education is dominated by a Cartesian–mechanical worldview, students
are quietly trained to:

   -

   distrust feeling as a source of knowledge
   -

   value abstraction over lived experience
   -

   treat themselves as brains on legs
   -

   see nature as “resource” or “system”
   -

   equate intelligence with emotional detachment

This produces graduates who are:

   -

   technically competent
   -

   emotionally fragmented
   -

   ethically uncertain
   -

   ecologically blind

This is not neutral training.
It *reshapes the nervous system*.
------------------------------
3. The harm is not dramatic—but it is deep

Universities do not *traumatize* students in obvious ways.
They do something more dangerous:

They normalize inner dissociation.

Students learn to:

   -

   suppress grief to meet deadlines
   -

   ignore bodily signals to perform
   -

   separate success from meaning
   -

   compete rather than relate

The cost appears later as:

   -

   anxiety and burnout
   -

   depression masked as ambition
   -

   loss of wonder
   -

   inability to sit in silence

This is *systemic harm*, not personal failure.
------------------------------
4. Is Cartesianism sane?

*As a tool? Yes.*
*As a worldview? No.*

A sane worldview must:

   -

   include the body
   -

   include feeling
   -

   include relationship
   -

   include uncertainty
   -

   include humility

Cartesianism excludes all of these by design.

Krishnamurti would say:

A fragment can never understand the whole.

A university built entirely on fragments produces *fragmented human beings*.
------------------------------
5. Why universities cling to it

Because Cartesianism:

   -

   is measurable
   -

   is efficient
   -

   aligns with economics
   -

   produces predictable outcomes
   -

   avoids existential questions

It is safe for institutions—but *unsafe for the soul*.
------------------------------
6. The deepest harm (often unseen)

The most serious damage is this:

Students are taught that *meaning is not a legitimate academic question*.

Once meaning is excluded:

   -

   ethics becomes procedural
   -

   ecology becomes technical
   -

   psychology becomes chemical
   -

   education becomes training

This is not education.
It is *conditioning*.
------------------------------
7. What sanity would look like instead

A sane university would not abandon science—but it would *situate it*.

It would:

   -

   treat feeling as a form of intelligence
   -

   allow silence as part of learning
   -

   study nature through participation, not only models
   -

   question progress, not worship it
   -

   educate humans, not economic units

Sanity is *wholeness*, not efficiency.
------------------------------
8. Final answer, plainly stated

Yes—*universities are harming students* by enforcing a mechanical,
Cartesian paradigm as the only valid way of knowing.

Cartesianism itself is *not insane*, but its dominance is.

A society that educates without feeling
will eventually *engineer its own collapse*—
very efficiently.
------------------------------

If you want, next we can:

   -

   Design a *non-Cartesian curriculum*
   -

   Examine *mental health as an educational outcome*
   -

   Or let Krishnamurti answer *“What is sanity?”* in his own way

Just tell me.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJtV21Bk9poBekeuHYovLwEq%2B523jqpXAihV5_g6FEUUg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to