Rajaram Sir,
You add to meaning,actually contribute and better.Thank You.
YM Sarma

On Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 9:12 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Nature is poisoned because poisoning is profitable.
>
> As long as:
>
>    - GDP measures destruction as growth
>    - Corporations are legally bound to maximize extraction
>    - Ecological damage is “externalized”
>
> rehabilitation will always lose.
>
> What must change:
>
>    - Treat ecological damage as *crime*, not cost
>    - Shift from growth economics to *maintenance economics*
>    - Reward restoration, not extraction
>    - Localize production to restore accountability
>
> This is not idealism.
> It is survival economics.   YM
>
> KR:    Yesterday, I saw a film “DRAUPATI” WHICH DEALT ABOUT THE VILLAINY
> OF FEW ADVOCATES, (UNQUALIFIED IS ANOTHER MATTER) JOINING HANDS WITH SUB
> REGISTRARS, POLICE AND AGENTS, REGISTER AS MARRIED WITHOUT GIRL IN THE SRO
> ISSUING CERTIFICATES, APART FROM MAKING COMPROMISE PHOTOS THROUGH
> TECHNOLOGY, AND BLACK MAIL PARENTS FOR MONEY. AFTER HECTIC EFFORTS OF THE
> DRAUPADI, ON 2 PLEAS MADE BY A GOOD ADVOCATE, COURT DECIDES THAT KEEPING
> CAMERAS IS ORDERED BUT PRESENCE O FPARENTS IS DENIED AS NOT PRAGMATIC.
>
>       So, in an economically thriving world, protection of nature is
> contributed only by a minor percentage by humans; while nature rewards and
> retributes the evil doers, in the process of self-growth.  Nature takes
> care of the earth and specie to give life as a mother; we shall love our
> mother and at the right time take care of her; but all the time she knows
> how to take care of others and herself too and thus grows as a Banyan Tree
> under which children remain protected and at times chided also. Economy is
> the root of survival with equity; barter is fair only as long as all are
> good which is unlikely. Common effort of money is earned only by
> investments and such, needs good and bad aspects, analysed as such, later
> only. When the splitting of the ATOM was discovered, it was to help finding
> energy for the living; but no one knew it could crash the nation so badly.
> But for that science progress through the survival economy cannot be
> stopped. NATURE IS IMPORTANT BUT THAT IMPORTANCE ATTRIBUTED CANNOT MAKE
> PEOPLE LIVE ONLY FOR ITS SUSTENANCE ALL THE TIME AS LIFE IS NOT FOR THAT
> PURPOSE.  Wealth of the nation is ARTHA. Only when the nation is wealthy,
> life spreads its wings with betterments; and that is ECONOMY. Because the
> economy scratches nature, efforts as possible alone can be rendered to
> maintain the good nature; and all cannot hug the trees all days. At the
> same time, GIVING AND RECEIVING, BUYING AND SELLING, EXCHANGING SURPLUS FOR
> AN EQUITY ARE ALL NORMAL FOR ENHANCING THE WEALTH OF THE NATION OR ELSE
> NATURE WILL NOT HIDE AND PART WITH GOLD, DIAM0NDS AND COKE FOR LIFE AND
> WEALTH. IF TAKING THE GOLD IS GOOD, CUTTING THE TREE MIGHT ALSO BE
> ESSENTIAL. While doing such works of necessity, bad elements with greed
> will enter the scene to destroy the peace. We have to go by law; add more
> productive nature; cherish the greenery; run along nature. Yet economy is
> required even for that so we have to be wealthier to do good even to
> nature.
>
>             Hence GDP is a measure of comparable wealth
>
>             Corporations must be monitored but violations must be punished
> not only by forces but forces include the public also as a whistle blower
> courageously and cannot say. “we will live and you will only die”
>
>              Damage in nature are two folded one by nature and another by
> humans and cattle. Yes we have to safeguard where whatever efforts ONLY
> WITH ADDED ECONOMY might be feasible. Yesterday in Republic TV Arbab was
> crying for the great pit consuming the lives of vehicle riders; yes it is a
> mystery; but though govt is responsible for the loss of lives, are they not
> neighbors of the area too? They could have designed something to prevent
> it, instead of pointing out the index finger.
>
>        Yes ecological damage could be treated as a crime; but if I cut off
> your tree branch as a villain in your compound and tip off the authorities,
> who shall or will be punished? Yourself as nature fell in your compound and
> how will you disprove? LAW ALONE CANNOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM BUT ENFORCEMENT
> BY EVERYBODY.
>
>        What is maintenance economics; survival needs? Neighbor need 20
> chapatis for family and you need only 4; and as days pass by it becomes the
> equations as in elevation of downtrodden, as corruption enters in there;
> then equity is only what you have the neighbor also shall endure policy may
> be enforced which is injustice. Economics is according to each need. So,
> growth is important as maintenance is not an equity.
>
>           Rewards and Punishments are legality; inurement is that of need;
> greed is the limitations; thus, sifting the crime for punishment might
> involve human errors. Rewards too. Padma sree is praised as well as
> criticized; which one is right?
>
>        Cement factories need certain raw materials so that it can be
> established only in certain places; so, localization could cause the
> imbalances, again asking for the disputes. Hence balance of power as nature
> does human shall also reciprocate, as far as possible, and leave the rest
> to nature is my thoughts.
>
> K Rajaram IRS 7226
>
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 08:15, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Mar*This is the right question to ask *after* diagnosis. And it has to
>> be answered without slogans, because the abyss you name is real.
>>
>> I’ll answer in layers—from *principle*, to *practice*, to *institution*,
>> to *inner rehabilitation*—because nature cannot be healed only “out
>> there.” The poisonings are physical, but their source is epistemic and
>> emotional.
>> ------------------------------
>> 1. First principle: stop pretending nature is an object
>>
>> Rehabilitation cannot begin while nature is treated as:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    a resource
>>    -
>>
>>    a system to be optimized
>>    -
>>
>>    a warehouse of “services”
>>
>> Nature can only recover when it is recognized again as a *subject*.
>>
>> This is not poetry. It is practical:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    You do not poison what you recognize as alive and responsive.
>>    -
>>
>>    You do not “externalize costs” onto something you feel yourself to
>>    belong to.
>>
>> *The first rehabilitation is perceptual.*
>> Without this, every technical fix becomes another layer of damage.
>> ------------------------------
>> 2. Immediate physical rehabilitation: stop adding poison
>>
>> Before “repair,” there must be *cessation*.
>>
>> Nature cannot heal while toxins continue to accumulate.
>>
>> This means, bluntly:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Ending fossil-fuel combustion (not “reducing emissions” indefinitely)
>>    -
>>
>>    Phasing out persistent chemicals (PFAS, pesticides, endocrine
>>    disruptors)
>>    -
>>
>>    Stopping industrial agriculture that treats soil as substrate
>>    -
>>
>>    Ending ocean dumping, mining runoff, and atmospheric aerosolization
>>
>> Nature has extraordinary *self-healing capacity* if poisoning stops.
>> Many ecosystems rebound rapidly when pressure is removed.
>>
>> The lie we live under is that destruction is irreversible.
>> Often, it is *ongoing*, not irreversible.
>> ------------------------------
>> 3. Soil, water, air: the three organs of the Earth
>>
>> Rehabilitation must focus on Earth’s functional organs, not abstractions.
>> Soil
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Regenerative agriculture, not “sustainable” monocultures
>>    -
>>
>>    Restoring microbial life, fungi, and humus
>>    -
>>
>>    Ending tillage that kills soil structure
>>    -
>>
>>    Returning animal integration, not factory farming
>>
>> Healthy soil:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Sequesters carbon
>>    -
>>
>>    Cleans water
>>    -
>>
>>    Feeds life without chemicals
>>
>> Water
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Restore wetlands (nature’s kidneys)
>>    -
>>
>>    Free rivers from unnecessary dams
>>    -
>>
>>    Stop industrial effluents at the source, not downstream
>>    -
>>
>>    Protect aquifers from extraction and contamination
>>
>> Air
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Eliminate combustion, not just offset it
>>    -
>>
>>    Restore forests and grasslands as living lungs
>>    -
>>
>>    Stop treating atmosphere as a dumping ground
>>
>> These are not futuristic ideas.
>> They are *older than industrial civilization*.
>> ------------------------------
>> 4. Rewilding: let nature work
>>
>> One of the most radical and effective acts is *restraint*.
>>
>> Rewilding means:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Giving land back to self-organizing ecosystems
>>    -
>>
>>    Allowing predators, complexity, and unpredictability
>>    -
>>
>>    Accepting that humans are participants, not managers
>>
>> Where rewilding has occurred:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Biodiversity explodes
>>    -
>>
>>    Soil regenerates
>>    -
>>
>>    Water cycles stabilize
>>
>> Nature knows how to heal.
>> What it needs is *space and time*, not supervision.
>> ------------------------------
>> 5. Economic rehabilitation: dismantle the poison incentive
>>
>> Nature is poisoned because poisoning is profitable.
>>
>> As long as:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    GDP measures destruction as growth
>>    -
>>
>>    Corporations are legally bound to maximize extraction
>>    -
>>
>>    Ecological damage is “externalized”
>>
>> rehabilitation will always lose.
>>
>> What must change:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Treat ecological damage as *crime*, not cost
>>    -
>>
>>    Shift from growth economics to *maintenance economics*
>>    -
>>
>>    Reward restoration, not extraction
>>    -
>>
>>    Localize production to restore accountability
>>
>> This is not idealism.
>> It is survival economics.
>> ------------------------------
>> 6. Educational rehabilitation: untrain the violence
>>
>> No lasting healing is possible without transforming education.
>>
>> A rehabilitative education would:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Teach children to observe living systems before abstractions
>>    -
>>
>>    Include direct, sustained contact with soil, animals, forests, water
>>    -
>>
>>    Teach empathy as a skill, not a weakness
>>    -
>>
>>    Integrate science with ethics, ecology, and philosophy
>>
>> A child who has learned to *listen to birds* will not design their
>> extinction lightly.
>> ------------------------------
>> 7. Scientific rehabilitation: from domination to participation
>>
>> Science must abandon its role as interrogator and return as listener.
>>
>> That means:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Fewer invasive experiments, more field presence
>>    -
>>
>>    Long-term observation over short-term extraction of data
>>    -
>>
>>    Valuing indigenous and experiential knowledge
>>    -
>>
>>    Accepting uncertainty and humility as strengths
>>
>> A science that listens will not poison what it studies.
>> ------------------------------
>> 8. Inner rehabilitation: healing the severed human
>>
>> This is the part most people avoid, but it is central.
>>
>> Nature is poisoned because humans are *internally fragmented*:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    feeling split from thinking
>>    -
>>
>>    body split from mind
>>    -
>>
>>    self split from world
>>
>> Rehabilitation requires:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Relearning how to feel without immediately using
>>    -
>>
>>    Silence, attention, grief
>>    -
>>
>>    Allowing ourselves to mourn what has been lost
>>
>> Grief is not weakness.
>> It is a *restorative force* that reconnects us.
>> ------------------------------
>> 9. The hard truth—and the hopeful one
>>
>> *Hard truth:*
>> Not everything can be saved. Some damage is irreversible.
>>
>> *Hopeful truth:*
>> Much more can recover than we are told—*if we stop now*.
>>
>> Nature does not ask for perfection.
>> It asks for *cessation, humility, and time*.
>> ------------------------------
>> Final thought
>>
>> Rehabilitating nature is not a project.
>> It is a *conversion*—from domination to belonging.
>>
>> When humans remember that they are not outside the biosphere but *organs
>> within it*, rehabilitation will no longer feel like sacrifice.
>>
>> It will feel like *coming home*.
>>
>> If you wish next, we can:
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    Design a *“Free University” curriculum centered on ecological
>>    rehabilitation*
>>    -
>>
>>    Explore *traditional cultures that successfully avoided this abyss*
>>    -
>>
>>    Or examine *what humans must unlearn* before nature can heal
>>
>> Your question is not academic.
>> It is the question of this century.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Thatha_Patty" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKorN6sCC%2BCqexvEtieLxtD2fXDJkh7QeUBonn_nst_%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKorN6sCC%2BCqexvEtieLxtD2fXDJkh7QeUBonn_nst_%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
*Mar*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJ%2B4jbshFY7d%3D8Kr4Z_Qm8-BmkDE14LJ8LDdP%3DX1Lh92g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to