Thank u and welcome KR

On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 09:19, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Rajaram Sir,
> You add to meaning,actually contribute and better.Thank You.
> YM Sarma
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 9:12 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Nature is poisoned because poisoning is profitable.
>>
>> As long as:
>>
>>    - GDP measures destruction as growth
>>    - Corporations are legally bound to maximize extraction
>>    - Ecological damage is “externalized”
>>
>> rehabilitation will always lose.
>>
>> What must change:
>>
>>    - Treat ecological damage as *crime*, not cost
>>    - Shift from growth economics to *maintenance economics*
>>    - Reward restoration, not extraction
>>    - Localize production to restore accountability
>>
>> This is not idealism.
>> It is survival economics.   YM
>>
>> KR:    Yesterday, I saw a film “DRAUPATI” WHICH DEALT ABOUT THE VILLAINY
>> OF FEW ADVOCATES, (UNQUALIFIED IS ANOTHER MATTER) JOINING HANDS WITH SUB
>> REGISTRARS, POLICE AND AGENTS, REGISTER AS MARRIED WITHOUT GIRL IN THE SRO
>> ISSUING CERTIFICATES, APART FROM MAKING COMPROMISE PHOTOS THROUGH
>> TECHNOLOGY, AND BLACK MAIL PARENTS FOR MONEY. AFTER HECTIC EFFORTS OF THE
>> DRAUPADI, ON 2 PLEAS MADE BY A GOOD ADVOCATE, COURT DECIDES THAT KEEPING
>> CAMERAS IS ORDERED BUT PRESENCE O FPARENTS IS DENIED AS NOT PRAGMATIC.
>>
>>       So, in an economically thriving world, protection of nature is
>> contributed only by a minor percentage by humans; while nature rewards and
>> retributes the evil doers, in the process of self-growth.  Nature takes
>> care of the earth and specie to give life as a mother; we shall love our
>> mother and at the right time take care of her; but all the time she knows
>> how to take care of others and herself too and thus grows as a Banyan Tree
>> under which children remain protected and at times chided also. Economy is
>> the root of survival with equity; barter is fair only as long as all are
>> good which is unlikely. Common effort of money is earned only by
>> investments and such, needs good and bad aspects, analysed as such, later
>> only. When the splitting of the ATOM was discovered, it was to help finding
>> energy for the living; but no one knew it could crash the nation so badly.
>> But for that science progress through the survival economy cannot be
>> stopped. NATURE IS IMPORTANT BUT THAT IMPORTANCE ATTRIBUTED CANNOT MAKE
>> PEOPLE LIVE ONLY FOR ITS SUSTENANCE ALL THE TIME AS LIFE IS NOT FOR THAT
>> PURPOSE.  Wealth of the nation is ARTHA. Only when the nation is wealthy,
>> life spreads its wings with betterments; and that is ECONOMY. Because the
>> economy scratches nature, efforts as possible alone can be rendered to
>> maintain the good nature; and all cannot hug the trees all days. At the
>> same time, GIVING AND RECEIVING, BUYING AND SELLING, EXCHANGING SURPLUS FOR
>> AN EQUITY ARE ALL NORMAL FOR ENHANCING THE WEALTH OF THE NATION OR ELSE
>> NATURE WILL NOT HIDE AND PART WITH GOLD, DIAM0NDS AND COKE FOR LIFE AND
>> WEALTH. IF TAKING THE GOLD IS GOOD, CUTTING THE TREE MIGHT ALSO BE
>> ESSENTIAL. While doing such works of necessity, bad elements with greed
>> will enter the scene to destroy the peace. We have to go by law; add more
>> productive nature; cherish the greenery; run along nature. Yet economy is
>> required even for that so we have to be wealthier to do good even to
>> nature.
>>
>>             Hence GDP is a measure of comparable wealth
>>
>>             Corporations must be monitored but violations must be
>> punished not only by forces but forces include the public also as a whistle
>> blower courageously and cannot say. “we will live and you will only die”
>>
>>              Damage in nature are two folded one by nature and another by
>> humans and cattle. Yes we have to safeguard where whatever efforts ONLY
>> WITH ADDED ECONOMY might be feasible. Yesterday in Republic TV Arbab was
>> crying for the great pit consuming the lives of vehicle riders; yes it is a
>> mystery; but though govt is responsible for the loss of lives, are they not
>> neighbors of the area too? They could have designed something to prevent
>> it, instead of pointing out the index finger.
>>
>>        Yes ecological damage could be treated as a crime; but if I cut
>> off your tree branch as a villain in your compound and tip off the
>> authorities, who shall or will be punished? Yourself as nature fell in your
>> compound and how will you disprove? LAW ALONE CANNOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM BUT
>> ENFORCEMENT BY EVERYBODY.
>>
>>        What is maintenance economics; survival needs? Neighbor need 20
>> chapatis for family and you need only 4; and as days pass by it becomes the
>> equations as in elevation of downtrodden, as corruption enters in there;
>> then equity is only what you have the neighbor also shall endure policy may
>> be enforced which is injustice. Economics is according to each need. So,
>> growth is important as maintenance is not an equity.
>>
>>           Rewards and Punishments are legality; inurement is that of
>> need; greed is the limitations; thus, sifting the crime for punishment
>> might involve human errors. Rewards too. Padma sree is praised as well as
>> criticized; which one is right?
>>
>>        Cement factories need certain raw materials so that it can be
>> established only in certain places; so, localization could cause the
>> imbalances, again asking for the disputes. Hence balance of power as nature
>> does human shall also reciprocate, as far as possible, and leave the rest
>> to nature is my thoughts.
>>
>> K Rajaram IRS 7226
>>
>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 at 08:15, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mar*This is the right question to ask *after* diagnosis. And it has to
>>> be answered without slogans, because the abyss you name is real.
>>>
>>> I’ll answer in layers—from *principle*, to *practice*, to *institution*,
>>> to *inner rehabilitation*—because nature cannot be healed only “out
>>> there.” The poisonings are physical, but their source is epistemic and
>>> emotional.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 1. First principle: stop pretending nature is an object
>>>
>>> Rehabilitation cannot begin while nature is treated as:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    a resource
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    a system to be optimized
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    a warehouse of “services”
>>>
>>> Nature can only recover when it is recognized again as a *subject*.
>>>
>>> This is not poetry. It is practical:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    You do not poison what you recognize as alive and responsive.
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    You do not “externalize costs” onto something you feel yourself to
>>>    belong to.
>>>
>>> *The first rehabilitation is perceptual.*
>>> Without this, every technical fix becomes another layer of damage.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 2. Immediate physical rehabilitation: stop adding poison
>>>
>>> Before “repair,” there must be *cessation*.
>>>
>>> Nature cannot heal while toxins continue to accumulate.
>>>
>>> This means, bluntly:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Ending fossil-fuel combustion (not “reducing emissions” indefinitely)
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Phasing out persistent chemicals (PFAS, pesticides, endocrine
>>>    disruptors)
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Stopping industrial agriculture that treats soil as substrate
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Ending ocean dumping, mining runoff, and atmospheric aerosolization
>>>
>>> Nature has extraordinary *self-healing capacity* if poisoning stops.
>>> Many ecosystems rebound rapidly when pressure is removed.
>>>
>>> The lie we live under is that destruction is irreversible.
>>> Often, it is *ongoing*, not irreversible.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 3. Soil, water, air: the three organs of the Earth
>>>
>>> Rehabilitation must focus on Earth’s functional organs, not abstractions.
>>> Soil
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Regenerative agriculture, not “sustainable” monocultures
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Restoring microbial life, fungi, and humus
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Ending tillage that kills soil structure
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Returning animal integration, not factory farming
>>>
>>> Healthy soil:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Sequesters carbon
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Cleans water
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Feeds life without chemicals
>>>
>>> Water
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Restore wetlands (nature’s kidneys)
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Free rivers from unnecessary dams
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Stop industrial effluents at the source, not downstream
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Protect aquifers from extraction and contamination
>>>
>>> Air
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Eliminate combustion, not just offset it
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Restore forests and grasslands as living lungs
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Stop treating atmosphere as a dumping ground
>>>
>>> These are not futuristic ideas.
>>> They are *older than industrial civilization*.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 4. Rewilding: let nature work
>>>
>>> One of the most radical and effective acts is *restraint*.
>>>
>>> Rewilding means:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Giving land back to self-organizing ecosystems
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Allowing predators, complexity, and unpredictability
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Accepting that humans are participants, not managers
>>>
>>> Where rewilding has occurred:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Biodiversity explodes
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Soil regenerates
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Water cycles stabilize
>>>
>>> Nature knows how to heal.
>>> What it needs is *space and time*, not supervision.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 5. Economic rehabilitation: dismantle the poison incentive
>>>
>>> Nature is poisoned because poisoning is profitable.
>>>
>>> As long as:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    GDP measures destruction as growth
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Corporations are legally bound to maximize extraction
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Ecological damage is “externalized”
>>>
>>> rehabilitation will always lose.
>>>
>>> What must change:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Treat ecological damage as *crime*, not cost
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Shift from growth economics to *maintenance economics*
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Reward restoration, not extraction
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Localize production to restore accountability
>>>
>>> This is not idealism.
>>> It is survival economics.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 6. Educational rehabilitation: untrain the violence
>>>
>>> No lasting healing is possible without transforming education.
>>>
>>> A rehabilitative education would:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Teach children to observe living systems before abstractions
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Include direct, sustained contact with soil, animals, forests, water
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Teach empathy as a skill, not a weakness
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Integrate science with ethics, ecology, and philosophy
>>>
>>> A child who has learned to *listen to birds* will not design their
>>> extinction lightly.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 7. Scientific rehabilitation: from domination to participation
>>>
>>> Science must abandon its role as interrogator and return as listener.
>>>
>>> That means:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Fewer invasive experiments, more field presence
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Long-term observation over short-term extraction of data
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Valuing indigenous and experiential knowledge
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Accepting uncertainty and humility as strengths
>>>
>>> A science that listens will not poison what it studies.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 8. Inner rehabilitation: healing the severed human
>>>
>>> This is the part most people avoid, but it is central.
>>>
>>> Nature is poisoned because humans are *internally fragmented*:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    feeling split from thinking
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    body split from mind
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    self split from world
>>>
>>> Rehabilitation requires:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Relearning how to feel without immediately using
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Silence, attention, grief
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Allowing ourselves to mourn what has been lost
>>>
>>> Grief is not weakness.
>>> It is a *restorative force* that reconnects us.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 9. The hard truth—and the hopeful one
>>>
>>> *Hard truth:*
>>> Not everything can be saved. Some damage is irreversible.
>>>
>>> *Hopeful truth:*
>>> Much more can recover than we are told—*if we stop now*.
>>>
>>> Nature does not ask for perfection.
>>> It asks for *cessation, humility, and time*.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Final thought
>>>
>>> Rehabilitating nature is not a project.
>>> It is a *conversion*—from domination to belonging.
>>>
>>> When humans remember that they are not outside the biosphere but *organs
>>> within it*, rehabilitation will no longer feel like sacrifice.
>>>
>>> It will feel like *coming home*.
>>>
>>> If you wish next, we can:
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Design a *“Free University” curriculum centered on ecological
>>>    rehabilitation*
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Explore *traditional cultures that successfully avoided this abyss*
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Or examine *what humans must unlearn* before nature can heal
>>>
>>> Your question is not academic.
>>> It is the question of this century.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Thatha_Patty" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKorN6sCC%2BCqexvEtieLxtD2fXDJkh7QeUBonn_nst_%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKorN6sCC%2BCqexvEtieLxtD2fXDJkh7QeUBonn_nst_%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>
> --
> *Mar*
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo8GmSVkdw1S2P%2BYFmQGUBEopnNxZbZH9EqMacRT361%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to