-- 
*Mar*

The Proto Consciousness

When I write that the Higgs field before the big bang can be or may be
proto consciousness, I confront many who Vince at the intrusion into the
precincts of the sacred cartesianism by this subject consciousness
ostracized in the sciences based on the Cartesian mechanical paradigm. They
want my speculation to be confined to Philosophy only and not make Higg’s
mathematical reduction, into non quantifiable consciousness.Peter Higgs
convinced the mathematics champions with his mathematical equations and did
not indulge in any Holistic or as is called into unscientific and non
Cartesian rhetoric where only mathematical rigor is acceptable.

But when the Universe is uni verse or one unending poem, why should this
caste separation of Philosophy and Science be maintained? Why should a Sage
who feels nature and experiences discoveries and revelations directly from
nature be prohibited from identifying the Higgs field with proto
consciousness and view the Big bang as the birth and growth of
consciousness? Is science to be confined only to technology and mechanical
confirmation only and every proof based on feeling directly to be excluded?

As it is if nature is not tampered allowed complete freedom, brilliant
ideas as discoveries and revelations strike  from nature. The Troposphere
here functions as the the ocean of revelations vitality. At the ultimate
fundamental level, the Universe is covered and filled with
electromagnetism. Actually if we do not bother to obey the Cartesian path,
and follow the obvious fact, then we can conclude that every life form is
actually a form of electromagnetism.

You consist of cells. The cells consist of atoms. An atom consists of
positive electromagnetism or protons in the nucleus and negative
electromagnetism or electrons hovering around the nucleus, from which atom,
photon flows as infra red rays flow from us as life form. When life is
electromagnetic or form of consciousness, why this dogmatism of not
agreeing that the Higgs field itself may be proto consciousness? Why ghetto
the subject consciousness itself into another field called Philosophy, the
Cartesian orthodoxy that allows only the consciousness-less and mechanical
phenomena? Now almost in every University we do not find any subject of
consciousness or philosophy excepting the cartesianed Newtonian Psychology.

Nature is converted into a life-less phenomenon, which gives license to
tamper. All sciences shall be rebuilt with consciousness as the fundamental
paradigm. The mechanical paradigm is destroying nature.

As a beginning, every University must start ‘Free Nature Prks’ without any
tampering, with the basic paradigm that nature is conscious and that the
whole Universe is conscious. I do not expect any confirmation to this
advocacy of mine where we have only the mechanical and feelings-less
paradigm.

YM Sarma

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJOatwOt%3D9aTA2rOfqT9MjK%3D6A-Z0X%2BaNypEm7dE7PAaQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to