The Proto Consciousness
When I write that the Higgs field before the big bang can be or may
be proto consciousness, I confront many who Vince at the intrusion into the
precincts of the sacred cartesianism by this subject consciousness
ostracized in the sciences based on the Cartesian mechanical paradigm. They
want my speculation to be confined to Philosophy only and not make HIgg’s
mathematical reduction, into non quantifiable consciousness. Peter Higgs
convinced the mathematics champions with his mathematical equations and did
not indulge in any Holistic or as is called into unscientific and
non-Cartesian rhetoric where only mathematical rigor is acceptable.
But when the Universe is uni verse or one unending poem, why should
this caste separation of Philosophy and Science be maintained? Why should a
Sage who feels nature and experiences discoveries and revelations directly
from nature be prohibited from identifying the Higgs field with proto
consciousness and view the Big bang as the birth and growth of
consciousness? Is science to be confined only to technology and mechanical
confirmation only and every proof based on feeling directly to be
excluded? YMji 1326
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
KR In the opening Higg’s field is only guessed as proto-consciousness
as evident from “may be”. The maths derivation does not lead to proving the
existence of consciousness before the Big bang; rather assumption gets
concluded from the fact there was a Brahman before the “aum’ the Big Bang,
which is also the cause and effect of consciousness so, consciousness is
Brahmam philosophically. This is a deduction from the Vedic concept that
all are Brahmam “sarvam kalu vite Brahmam”. However, an abstract of a
qualia , which can be felt only by an individual by the efforts alone,
cannot be a field like magnetic field but a field only vedically, as
addressed as “shetram” in B G . Higg’s field may be a filler of space or
even be expandable as elastic, but did it convey anything scientifically,
an action oriented towards the sound followed by space and time only later?
WHERE WAS THAT HIGG’S FIELD CONSTITUTED?
NOW LEART ONLY CAN UNDERSTAND THE DERIVATION STRUCTURE:
In the Standard Model, the Higgs boson is a massive scalar boson
whose mass must be found experimentally. Its mass has been determined to be
125.35±0.15 GeV/c2 by CMS (2022) and 125.11±0.11 GeV/c2 by ATLAS (2023). It
is the only particle that remains massive even at very high energies. [KR
It means as speed increases mass would decrease; higher the energy in
speed, lower the mass; inversely proportional] It has zero spin, even
(positive) parity, no electric charge, no colour charge, and it couples to
(interacts with) mass. It is also very unstable, decaying into other
particles almost immediately via several possible pathways. The Higgs field
is a scalar field, with two neutral and two electrically charged components
that form a complex doublet of the weak isospin SU(2) symmetry. Unlike any
other known quantum field, it has a sombrero potential. This shape means
that below extremely high cross-over temperature of 159.5±1.5 GeV/kB such
as those seen during the first *picosecond (10−12 s) of the Big Bang,* {KR
A picosecond (ps) is an SI unit of time equal to seconds, or one
trillionth of a second (0.000000000001 s).} the Higgs field in its ground
state has less energy when it is *nonzero,* resulting in a nonzero vacuum
expectation value. Therefore, in today's universe the Higgs field has a
nonzero value everywhere (including in otherwise empty space). This nonzero
value in turn breaks the weak isospin SU(2) symmetry of the electroweak
interaction everywhere. (Technically the non-zero *expectation* value
converts the Lagrangian's Yukawa
{{{KR: In particle physics, the Yukawa coupling or Yukawa interaction,
named after Hideki Yukawa, is an interaction between particles according to
the Yukawa potential. Specifically, it is between a scalar field (or
pseudoscalar field) ϕ{\displaystyle \phi } and a Dirac field
ψ{\displaystyle \psi } of the typeV=gψ¯ϕψ{\displaystyle V=g\ {\bar {\psi
}}\phi \psi } (scalar) or gψ¯iγ5ϕψ{\displaystyle g\ {\bar {\psi
}}i\gamma ^{5}\phi \psi } (pseudoscalar). The Yukawa coupling was
developed to model the strong force between hadrons. Yukawa couplings are
thus used to describe the nuclear force between nucleons mediated by pions
(which are pseudoscalar mesons). Yukawa couplings are also used in the
Standard Model to describe the coupling between the Higgs field and
massless quark and lepton fields (i.e., the fundamental fermion particles).
Through spontaneous symmetry breaking, these fermions acquire a mass
proportional to the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field. This
Higgs–fermion coupling was first described by Steven Weinberg in 1967 to
model lepton masses}}}
coupling terms into mass terms.) When this happens, three components of
the Higgs field are "absorbed" by the SU(2) and U(1) gauge bosons (the
Higgs mechanism) to become the longitudinal components of the now-massive W
and Z bosons of the weak force. *The remaining electrically neutral
component either manifests as a Higgs boson, or may couple separately to
other particles known as fermions (via Yukawa couplings), causing these to
acquire mass as well.*
* {KR what exactly is Higgs boson is explained, which is weaker of the weak
energy or may not be Higgs Boson but may be fermions. And such inconclusive
identifiable but remaining unseen and unFelt, --HOW IT CAN BE THE
CONSCIOUSNESS IS MY QUESTION? ATOMS ARE ONLY MATTER} *
Even though the knowledge of many of the Higgs boson properties has
advanced significantly since its discovery, the Higgs boson's self-coupling
remains unmeasured. The shape of the Higgs potential in the Standard Model
includes both trilinear and quartic self-couplings, which are key to
understanding the complete shape of the potential and the nature of the
Higgs field and EWSB. Higgs boson pair production offers a direct
experimental probe of the self-coupling λ at the electroweak scale.
Evidence for the Higgs field and its properties has been extremely
significant for many reasons. The primary importance of the Higgs boson is
that it completes the mechanism by which the heavy electroweak bosons
acquire mass, and it is fortunate that the mass is such that it is able to
be examined using existing experimental technology, as a way to confirm and
study the entire Higgs field theory. Conversely, evidence that the Higgs
field and boson did not exist within the expected mass range would have
also been significant.
More speculatively, the Higgs field has also been proposed as the
energy of the vacuum, which at the extreme energies of the first moments of
the Big Bang caused the universe to be a kind of featureless symmetry of
undifferentiated, extremely high energy. *In this kind of speculation*, *the
single unified field of a Grand Unified Theory is identified as (or
modelled upon) the Higgs field,* and it is through successive symmetry
breakings of the Higgs field, or some similar field, at phase transitions
that the presently known forces and fields of the universe arise. *The
relationship (if any) between the Higgs field and the observed vacuum
energy density of the universe has also come under scientific study*. As
observed, the vacuum energy density is extremely close to zero, but the
energy densities predicted from the Higgs field, supersymmetry, and other
theories are typically many orders of magnitude larger. It is unclear how
these should be reconciled. *This cosmological constant problem remains a
major unanswered problem in physics. [KR If so incomplete theory
cannot assume a complete awareness of matter in all seasons in all places
and time. Hence my theory that higgs field is not the consciousness as
consciousness is concerned with the mind and purusha, and does not get
structured as particles of atoms getting modified or destroyed in
black-holes]*
*K Rajaram IRS 1326*
On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 at 06:05, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*
>
> The Proto Consciousness
>
> When I write that the Higgs field before the big bang can be or may be
> proto consciousness, I confront many who Vince at the intrusion into the
> precincts of the sacred cartesianism by this subject consciousness
> ostracized in the sciences based on the Cartesian mechanical paradigm. They
> want my speculation to be confined to Philosophy only and not make Higg’s
> mathematical reduction, into non quantifiable consciousness.Peter Higgs
> convinced the mathematics champions with his mathematical equations and did
> not indulge in any Holistic or as is called into unscientific and non
> Cartesian rhetoric where only mathematical rigor is acceptable.
>
> But when the Universe is uni verse or one unending poem, why should this
> caste separation of Philosophy and Science be maintained? Why should a Sage
> who feels nature and experiences discoveries and revelations directly from
> nature be prohibited from identifying the Higgs field with proto
> consciousness and view the Big bang as the birth and growth of
> consciousness? Is science to be confined only to technology and mechanical
> confirmation only and every proof based on feeling directly to be excluded?
>
> As it is if nature is not tampered allowed complete freedom, brilliant
> ideas as discoveries and revelations strike from nature. The Troposphere
> here functions as the the ocean of revelations vitality. At the ultimate
> fundamental level, the Universe is covered and filled with
> electromagnetism. Actually if we do not bother to obey the Cartesian path,
> and follow the obvious fact, then we can conclude that every life form is
> actually a form of electromagnetism.
>
> You consist of cells. The cells consist of atoms. An atom consists of
> positive electromagnetism or protons in the nucleus and negative
> electromagnetism or electrons hovering around the nucleus, from which atom,
> photon flows as infra red rays flow from us as life form. When life is
> electromagnetic or form of consciousness, why this dogmatism of not
> agreeing that the Higgs field itself may be proto consciousness? Why ghetto
> the subject consciousness itself into another field called Philosophy, the
> Cartesian orthodoxy that allows only the consciousness-less and mechanical
> phenomena? Now almost in every University we do not find any subject of
> consciousness or philosophy excepting the cartesianed Newtonian Psychology.
>
> Nature is converted into a life-less phenomenon, which gives license to
> tamper. All sciences shall be rebuilt with consciousness as the fundamental
> paradigm. The mechanical paradigm is destroying nature.
>
> As a beginning, every University must start ‘Free Nature Prks’ without any
> tampering, with the basic paradigm that nature is conscious and that the
> whole Universe is conscious. I do not expect any confirmation to this
> advocacy of mine where we have only the mechanical and feelings-less
> paradigm.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJOatwOt%3D9aTA2rOfqT9MjK%3D6A-Z0X%2BaNypEm7dE7PAaQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJOatwOt%3D9aTA2rOfqT9MjK%3D6A-Z0X%2BaNypEm7dE7PAaQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo4vGx%3D-x_7yhh76qzh4Ue0tnSv95w1p2ZJTiLweGLDhQ%40mail.gmail.com.
