Mr Gopalakrishnan once again revealed his anger-unmanaged-reversions by
ignorant,illogical words and also illegitimate-comments of not knowing a
subject and software and search engine. If a person adds or defends the
truth well, one may learn or develop a well founded thoughts to build over.
One who is writing his own swan-song unmeritorious is difficult to answer,
in the sense, without hurting him, it cannot be done.
Google search engines are more than 650 in the world; search engines
like Railway engines, one must operate and guide; it's called a program;
neither google nor any AI can operate on its own as humans can do. The
difference between the programming of a language (assembly language) in a
computer and AI or search engines is that a pramme based machine must also
have a data basis. Data is also fed only by human engineers of
different countries; they may be aware of their own; but may not be aware
of other national aspects and strength of materials except as SAID-TO BE
-AUTHENTICATED FROM THEIR LANGUAGE BOOKS. In other words SAYANA WROTE
TREATISE ON RIG VEDA WHICH T H GRIFFITH HAVING LEARNT A LEVEL OF SANSKRIT,
UNABLE TO COMPREHEND WITH ONLY ENGLISH AS BACK GROUND WITH BIAS ETC, TRIED
TO ADOPT ITS MEANINGS AS TOLD BY SAYANA AGAIN IN SANSKRIT BUT DEPENDED ON
THE KASI PUNDITS' TRANSLATIONS. SO PUNDITS FOR A PALTRY SUM DECODED WHAT
THEY KNEW; (VIVEKANANDA IN HIS 9 VOL TREATISE EXHIBITED HIS ANGER AGAINST
THE KASI PUNDITS WHICH CAN BE READ BY READING THOSE BOOKS AVAILABLE FROM
RAMAKRISHNA MUTT. [THERE ARE MANY ENGLISH LATINO AND FRENCH TREATISE ON RIG
VEDA WHICH WERE WRITTEN NOT TO EXTOL THE INDIAN CULTURE, BUT TO TARNISH ITS
IMAGE AGAINST THE CHRISTIANITY WHICH WEST AUTHORS THEMSELVES HAD COMMENTED.
{ AS AN INTERLUDE, ONE SUCH AUTHOR IS FROM USA BY NAME VAMADEVA SASTRI
INDIAN- NAMED USA CHRISTIAN ADOPTING HINDUISM; ANOTHER STEPHEN KNAPP WHO
WROTE A BOOK BY NAME GREECE WHERE HE PARALLELLED MANY NAMES OF INDIAN
CITIES NAMED AFTER EASTERN GREECE AFTER THE MIGRATION OF THE
MAHABHARATA WAR.} MANY MORE REFINED AUTHORS ARE ALSO SEEN. [ GO(W) MEANS
COW AS WELL AS SUN; BUT T H GRIFFITH ADOPTED THE MEANING AS COW AND HAD
WRITTEN IN SUCH A MANNER THAT READING THOSE TRANSLATIONS WILL MAKE THE
VEDA A JOKER. OFCOURSE AS INDIAN KLIKE GOPALAKRISHNAN WOULD ADOPT SUCH
TRANSLATIONS AS GENUINE AND WITHOUT READING ARABINDO OR DAYANANDA OR SAYANA
ETC, WILL PASS A REMARK THAT GOOGLE IS CORRECT. OR HE IS ERROR FREE WHO
CANNOT BE BLAMED. WELL READ AND WELL BEHAVED WILL NOT SAY SO, HENCE I
CALLED HIM AN IDIOT. THE GOOGLE WAS FED BY THE USA AND ENGLAND INCLUDING
THE 3RD RATE INDIANS FED THAT GRIFFITH. WHO IS AT FAULT. GOPALAKRISHNAN IN
PRESENTI SPREADING THE EVIL UNKNOWINGLY TO IGNORANT POSTERITY.
GOPALAKRISHNAN WROTE THAT GOTRA IS CONNECTED TO 27 STARS BUT
SHOWED KRATU IS TAGGED WITH A FEW; REVATI IS A STAR TAGGED TO SUN AND
REVA-ITI ALSO MEAN THE SUN. BECAUSE THE SAPTA RISHI AND GREAT BEAR WERE
COMPARED ENGLISH VS SANSKRIT RISHID AND BECAUSE THE STELLAR PATTERN OF
STARS AROUND ARE DIFFERENTIATED (27) IN SKY IN OUR ASTRONOMY AND BECAUSE
THE LINES OF THEIR NAMES IN MANY CONSTELLATIONS ARE ALSO DISCUSSED; SOME
ONE NOW EQUATES THE SAPTA RISHI AND ENGLISH NAMES 7 IN ALL WHERE KRATU IS
DUBE IN ENGLISH ; SO SOMEONE WRITES DUBE MEANS KRATU. NOW STELLAR
PATTERNS OF ASTRONOMY SPEAKS WITH REFERENCES TO PLANETS AND CONSTELLATIONS
OUR INDIAN 27 STARS. NOW AROUND "NAMED KRATU" SOME STARS ARE THERE
INCLUDING REVATHI. SO, SOMEONE ELSE WRITES, THAT KRATU HAS THESE STARS AND
KRATU IS A GOTRA SO GOTRA IS CONNECTED TO STAR; AND IS IT A LOGIC?
ANNADURAI IS SITTING AND READING IN ALL CORNERS WITH QUOTES OF EVR ;
ANNADURAI WAS MADE RENOWNED BY BUILDING STATUES BY HIS MEN OUT OF RESPECT;
QUOTES ARE SOMEBODY'S POSSESSION; BUT IF ONE WERE TO RUN A LOGIC THAT
ANNADURAI STATUE HAS QUOTES WHICH IS FROM HIM -WILL IT BE A LOGIC? KRATI
AND PULAHA ARE NOT EVEN LEADERS OF RIG VEDA VERSES IN ALL THE 10 MANDALAS;
SOME IDIOT IN WIKIPEDIA ( HAVE YOU SEEN IN WIKIPEDIA DEMANDING FOR PROOF
REFERENCES ETC?} WROTE KRATU IS SPOKEN IN 58 PLACES AND GOOGLE IS FED
WITHOUT DATA AND GOPALAKRISHNAN SAYS I AM NOT A DEFAULTER THEN WHO ELSE IS?
SOME IDIOT AS WRONGLY UNDERSTOOD BY GOPALAKRISHNAN, ALSO MISUNDERSTOOD
WITHOUT READING THE ORIGINAL AS COPIED FROM SOMEWHERE, THAT KRATU IS SPOKEN
IN 58 PLACES, WHICH WAS FED TO AI GOOGLE WHICH COUGHS UP BACK TO
GOPALAKRISHNAN; WHO IS A AVIVEKI? HAVE YOU EVER NOTICED ALL AI MENTIONING
CAUTION NOTICE WELL AHEAD THAT RESPONSIBILITY IS THAT OF THE ADOPTER AND
GOOGLE OR ANY AI IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERROR-PRONE? IN 58 PLACES SAYANA
FOLLOWED BY ADI SHANKARA HAD STATED THAT WORD KRUTU IS USED; NOT THAT WORD
KRATU IS ONE OF THE SAPTA RISHI AT ALL. KRU MEANS TO DO; KRATU MEANS
RITUAL; SRADDHA IS A RITUAL ONE AMONG THE 40 SAMSKARAS. RIG VEDA USED THE
WORD KRATU IN >58 PLACES AS PER AUROBINDO AND DAYANANDA. B G HAD USED THE
KRU IN MANY PLACES . AND DITTO GOPALA REPEATED IT WITHOUT ANY SEMBLANCE OF
VERIFICATION AS TO WHAT IT IS; IF YOU DON'T HAVE A VEDA DON'T SPEAK ABOUT
IT; IF YOU DON'T KNOW KERALA TOURISM ON TEMPLE DOES NOT SIMPLY COPY
AND PASTE WRONG INFO.
oN THE CONTRARY again do not blabber uncanny references like
1 We all know {KR who are those we who do not have veda to refer but adds
as calibre etc and includes like tail-cut foxes-we all know?} 2
*Veda * came from the mouth of Brahma, once lost , Lord Vishnu saved it
through his incarnation. It has come as *smriti though Sathya yuga, Thretha
yuga ,Dwapara yuga to Kaliyuga*. }KR FROM WHERE DID HE CONFIRM VEDA CAME
FROM THE MOUTH OF BRAHMA? PL QUOTE NOT GRIFFITH LIKE; DO YOU THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN BRAHMAM, BRAHMA BRU AND BRUGU MEANS WHAT? rIG VEDAM SAYS THAT
BRAHMAM IN EVERY CHATUR YUGA BEGINNING TAUGHT THE VEDA IN ORDER TO HELP THE
CREATION AND BRAHMA TAUGHT IT TO 4 RISHIS MIND BORN SANAT SANAT KUMARA ETC;
AND SO ON; BASICALLY GOPALA DOES NOT KNOW WHERE AND WHO SAID IT ORIGINALLY
BUT READ SOME WIKI OR GOOGLE AND SAYS "WE ALL KNOW". WHEN VISHNU BRINGING
THE HIDDEN VEDA OUT IN DASAVATARA IS ALSO NOT KNOWN TO HIM PROPERLY; IT IS
NOT ONCE LOST; DASAVATA HAPPENS IN EVERY CHATUR YUGA AND THAT IS WHAT
KRISHNA IN b g SAYS IN ALL YUGAS YOU AND I WERE THERE BUT I REMEMBER ALL
BUT NOT YOU ARJUNA. GOPALA KRISHNA DOES NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
SRUTI AND SMRITI AND PRESUMED VISHNU BROUGHT OUT SOME PALM LEAVES. SRUTI
WAS FOR A LONG TIME BUT SMRITI CAME UP ONLY AFTER ETCHED IN ROCKS OR PALM
LEAVES WHICH WERE MUCH LATER; AND SUCH SCRIPTS SMRITIS ARE IN PUNE
BANDARKAR WHICH WAS CARBON DATED AND THE THAT PERIOD WAS ASSIGNED
BY BRITISH AS DATE OF RIG VEDAM ETC. IN DASAVATARA THERE WAS NO SMRITI
AT ALL. 3 How much change might have occurred after it came as script
in palm leaves or copper plates ? {KR DID GOPALA READ THE RESEARCH DONE
IN INDIA NOT ONLY BY INDIANS BUT ALSO BY BRITISH ASIATIC SOCIETY
PUBLICATIONS STATING THAT (A) SANSKRIT IS A LANGUAGE UNCHANGED FROM DAY
ONE TILL DATE UNLIKE TAMIL WHICH UNDERWENT 13 CHANGES AND EVEN KK DID ONE
WRITING "LI" . BRITISHERS WERE SHOCKED TO HEAR THE SAME SRUTI (LONG AFTER
AS SMRITI ALSO) IN ALL PARTS OF INDIA VERBATIM WITHOUT CHANGE WITHOUT A
BOOK. SO EVEN THAT SMRITI DID NOT CHANGE. pURANAS WERE KALIYUGA PRODUCTS IN
MAJORITY WHICH HAD INSERTIONS AND THEY ARE NOT AUTHORITY ON VEDAS. SO MR
GOPALKRISHNAN PL DO NOT EXPOSE RHETORICALLY AS IF.........4 The Veda says
if a Brahmin did not perform sandhya for three days he is a non Brahmin. Is
it possible for a Brahmin hospitalized in ICU in critical stage can do
sandhya? So if he is in ICU for 5 days a Brahmin becomes a non brahmin
according to blind Veda following Mr. Rajaram..* Do either of the members
agree to it? {KR WHERE IT SSI SAID SO PL SHOW ME; IT IS SAID ALL ARE
BORN ONLY A SHUDRA BUT BY STUDYING VEDAS AND OTHER RITUALS BECOMES A VARNA.
BUT NEVER SAID SANDHYAVANDANAM IF NOT DONE ETC AS IMAGINED BUT WROTE BY
SOME IDIOT SOMEWHERE WITHOUT AUTHORITY AS REFERENCE. SO PL ESTABLISH WITH
VEDIC EVIDENCE. EVEN DMAK SAYS YOU ARE NOT A BRAHMIN AND THAT IS NOT AN
AUTHORITY. I END HERE AND EXPECT HIM TO BECOME REFINED. IN CASE IT DOES
NOT GO TO IYER 123 SOMEONE PL PUBLISH IT THERE tHANK YOU *
*K RAJARAM IRS 23326*
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 at 09:56, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I initially thought not to respond the jockey responses by Mr. Rajaram
> former IRS and view by Mr. APS Mani supporting his comments.
>
> We all know *Veda * came from the mouth of Brahma, once lost , Lord
> Vishnu saved it through his incarnation. It has come as *smriti though
> Sathya yuga, Thretha yuga ,Dwapara yuga to Kaliyuga*. How much of changes
> might have occurred after it came as script in palm leaves or copper plates
> ?
>
> The Veda says if a Brahmin did not perform sandhya for three days he is a
> non Brahmin. Is it possible for a Brahmin hospitalized in ICU in critical
> stage can do sandhya? So if he is in ICU for 5 days a Brahmin become a non
> brahmin according to blindly Veda following Mr. Rajaram..* Do either of
> the members agree to it? *
>
> As I understand *Google is not a machine like harvesting paddy or
> crushing coconut and prepare oil. *Google is a software machine.* I
> cannot explain what is software to the two experts*. It is a search
> engine. It searches even the available *Vedas* input to it.
>
> *If one search for a passage of Veda from any Veda it will reproduce. It
> is not a foolish engine. *
>
> Members who responded and viewed must think even *I have good caliber.
> They are only not calibered. *
>
> Otherwise I would not have become a class 1 officer in Indian Telecom
> Service. I have passed ITS class II and since departmental staff are only
> promoted I have become a *promoted ITS Class 1.*
>
>
> * Never degrade any one. The first one has degraded me telling I was
> never ITS Class I in earlier response and hence my response to this.*
>
> *Mr. Rajaram was also a CLERK in income tax office for long time, written
> UPSC for IAS many times and finally got IRS in the last attempt.*
>
> *An IRS can never imagine to be equal to IAS. Please do not make me to
> write more. *
> *Gopalakrishnan Former ITS class 1 (Blue book no 7024)*
>
> On Monday, 23 March 2026 at 08:23:27 am IST, APS Mani <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Though many members have seen and appreciated the following quote, I
> just want it to be in our Group as one member thinks Google search is
> ultimate, final, and authentic. Since the facts are as below, and we all
> know the same, there is no need to narrate further. Thanks and best wishes
> to all, Mani
>
> Quote:
>
> "Don't you have a vicarious liability? If Google says there is no
> gravitation will you simply copy and paste? Google is a machine and never
> will be wrong; your wrong passages are also considered by Google and
> reproduced; does it mean Google is correct? If Google says invest in
> shares of Govinda Co., will you blindly do it? If you don't have a backup,
> then why should you provide and mislead members? Write where you are strong
> and backed up
> Quote ends.
>
> Blindly following something, thinking it is authentic, will lead to
> dangerous conclusions.
>
> Except for one member in the group, all of us know what Google search is
> for a long time. For him, it is a new invention!
>
> --
> To go to your groups page on the web, login to your gmail account and then
> click on https://groups.google.com/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAOCR2sp8Vaac8a2mv%2BK1Ob8mK%2BTi-UfT9GsZs0wNFVYpJRpagQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAOCR2sp8Vaac8a2mv%2BK1Ob8mK%2BTi-UfT9GsZs0wNFVYpJRpagQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopCiJ6iCAPuJTAVsVj5aXYCSNHgp8emSA2rU7nMoEFB8g%40mail.gmail.com.
