Free-Reprint Article Written by: Jason OConnor 
See Terms of Reprint Below.


*****************************************************************
*
* This email is being delivered directly to members of the group:
* 
*    [email protected]
* 
*****************************************************************


We have moved our TERMS OF REPRINT to the end of the article.
Be certain to read our TERMS OF REPRINT and honor our TERMS 
OF REPRINT when you use this article. Thank you.

This article has been distributed by:
http://Article-Distribution.com

Helpful Link: 
  The Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Overview
  http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/iclp/dmca1.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Article Title:
==============

Why Is Most Music So Bad Today?

Article Description:
====================

Why is popular music so bad today? I mean, I'm not that old, but
jeez, the music of today, with only a few rare exceptions, kinda
stinks. Some would say that when New Year's Eve 1979 ended, we
were ushered into an era of lame music that we still haven't
escaped from today.


Additional Article Information:
===============================

1645 Words; formatted to 65 Characters per Line
Distribution Date and Time: 2006-08-31 11:24:00

Written By:     Jason OConnor
Copyright:      2006
Contact Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



For more free-reprint articles by Jason OConnor, please visit:
http://thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/d/index.shtml#Jason_OConnor


=============================================
Special Notice For Publishers and Webmasters:
=============================================

If you use this article on your website or in your ezine,
We Want To Know About It. Use the following URL to let
us know where you have used this article, and we will
include a link to your website on thePhantomWriters.com: 

http://thephantomwriters.com/notify.php?id=3484&p=load


HTML Copy-and-Paste and TEXT Copy-and-Paste 
Versions Of Article Are Available at:
http://thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/db/o/why-is-pop-music-so-bad-today.shtml#get_code

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Is Most Music So Bad Today?
Copyright © 2006 Jason OConnor
Best Show Tickets Las Vegas
http://www.bestshowticketslasvegas.com/



"Everything that can be invented has been invented." ~ Charles
H. Duell, Commissioner of the US Patent Office in 1899.

"Children nowadays are tyrants. They contradict their parents,
gobble their food and tyrannize their teachers." ~ Socrates



Why is popular music so bad today? I mean, I'm not that old, but
jeez, the music of today, with only a few rare exceptions, kinda
stinks. Some would say that when New Year's Eve 1979 ended, we
were ushered into an era of lame music that we still haven't
escaped from today.

I grew up in the 80's and remember listening to the Beatles,
John Lennon, Simon & Garfunkel, Roger Waters and Pink Floyd, the
Rolling Stones, Bob Marley, and David Bowie, to name a few, with
my brothers or my dad. I remember seeing album covers strewn
about my brother's bedroom. Albums, not CD's. (If you're a
really young reader, albums are like CD's in that they're flat
and round, but black, and a lot bigger. The get scratched and
don't work just like CD's though).

Some say that the 60's were a turbulent time in the U.S. and the
world and thus created a perfect environment and culture for
innovative and creative music. But let's face it. These days are
pretty turbulent as well. So where's the Crosby, Still, Nash and
Young of today to sing about our involvement in Iraq? Or where is
the Paul Simon of today to protest the government's stance on
stem cell research? All we've gotten recently is the new Paris
Hilton CD. Paris Hilton? Isn't she just famous for being famous?
And her new CD actually got some good reviews.

Before anyone accuses me of painting a broad brush stroke
condemning all music after the 70's, let me say that in more
recent times there has been a small amount of good stuff like
Phish or Midnite, and even politically-minded music such as U2,
but no where near the creative amount of earlier times.

I remember when the Dixi Chicks came out against President Bush
and the Iraq war. While not a bad band, they're hardly going to
achieve iconic status. And they paid dearly at the hands of big
business for their outspoken views. That's a far cry from the
politically-charged days of Woodstock where many artists were
speaking out, and changing things.

If you think about it, there are only a select few artists or
bands that can regularly sell out huge arenas today. These are
the icons. And the vast majority of those artists are bands from
before the 80's! Between last summer and this summer, here are
some of the really big concert ticket sellers: The Rolling
Stones, Roger Waters of Pink Floyd, Paul McCartney, Barbra
Streisand, Eric Clapton and The Eagles.

I recently read an article that suggested that music and tour
promoters, large venue owners and ticket companies are all
worried about concert sales taking a plunge after the legendary
artists stop touring. They realize it's going to be hard to sell
out big arenas after the dinosaurs become extinct. Who are the
artists of today who will reach that status tomorrow?

In a recent interview with Joe Walsh on Sirius Radio Joe said
there is not nearly as much improvisational rock anymore. And I
agree. When asked what bands he thought were decent these days,
he couldn't think of any for a while, and then finally said he
thought the Goo Goo Dolls were good. Hmmm.

Maybe I'm some kind of curmudgeon, but Top 40 today is just not
as good as it used to be. Is Kevin Federline really talented? I
just found out recently that his nickname is K-Fed. How about fed
up? I think K-Fed, J-Lo, X-tina (Christina Aguilera, no joke) and
A-Rod all need to get together ASAP and rethink their feeble
nicknames, just an FYI.

Here are the top 5 songs right now in the Summer of 2006:

 * Fergie - London Bridge
 * Gnarls Barkley - Crazy
 * Nelly Furtado Featuring Timbaland - Promiscuous
 * The Pussycat Dolls Featuring Snoop Dogg  - Buttons
 * Panic! At The Disco - I Write Sins Not Tragedies

And here were the top 5 albums of 2005:

 * Mariah Carey - The Emancipation of Mimi
 * 50 Cent - The Massacre
 * Kelly Clarkson - Breakaway
 * Green Day - American Idiot
 * The Black Eyed Peas - Monkey Business

Here are the top 5 albums of 1976:

 * Peter Frampton  - Frampton Comes Alive
 * Fleetwood Mac  - Fleetwood Mac
 * Wings  - Wings At The Speed Of Sound
 * Eagles  - Eagles Greatest Hits 1971-1975
 * Chicago - Chicago IX Greatest Hits

And here are the top 5 albums of 1966

 * Original Soundtrack The Sound Of Music
 * The Beatles - Revolver
 * The Beatles - Rubber Soul
 * The Rolling Stones - Aftermath
 * The Beach Boys - Pet Sounds

Is it just me, or is there a glaring difference between the two
21st Century lists and the second two 20th Century lists? To be
fair, I actually own Monkey Business and I like it. Also, Green
Day is decent. Admittedly, Wings isn't the best Paul McCartney
music around, but it is Sir Paul after all, and Chicago and The
Beach Boys are a little weak. But overall, the lists just don't
compare.

The music industry itself has changed so drastically that I think
that is one of the main reasons there is such a chasm between
today's music and the creations of yesteryear. Like sports and
medicine, music in another industry that has been a casualty of
big business and American capitalism.

No longer does the actual music quality drive the industry.
Instead, the people with the money and power at the record
companies notice some bad music selling well to young people for
example, and therefore decide that from then on they're only
going to find and promote that type of bad music since it made a
few bucks. They've totally stopped listening to the music and
instead only listen to the dollars.

No longer does the music they create determine the success of a
band. Instead, entertainment conglomerates tell fans what to
listen to, and that determines the success. They do this because
they have such a strangle hold on the media. We only have the
illusion of choice now. A vicious circle has begun where the
whole industry is inexorably spinning down, unable to find
purchase on the sides of some slimy corporate funnel, circling
downward uncontrollably into the abyss of painfully bad music.

Some bands occasionally slip through the vortex relatively
intact, sidestepping the almost institutionalized process of
"making it" set in place by music executives. Phish is a great
example of this. They became hugely successful in spite of the
music industry. Because they were so good and so tenacious in
touring and jamming, they attracted a large fan base. The sheer
numbers of eventual fans Phish had gave them a power that most
artists today can't have. Most other artists have to do what the
people with the purse strings tell them to do. And that often
makes for bad music. Unfortunately, Phish isn't even together
any more. But they're a rare exception in that they came after
the 70's and were highly creative and improvisational.

Another thing that contributes to the poor music of today is
technology. These days, Hollywood actors who can't sing can have
singing careers. The engineers touch up their voices, and use
every digital sound technique there is to make an average product
sellable, just like the magazines airbrush the models and
actresses, trimming years off to complete the illusion. There are
many ways in which the music engineers can do this in the studio
and even for artists on tour.

Ashlee Simpson is a good example of this. First, we saw her on
Saturday Night Live getting caught lip-sinking. Then I heard a
recent interview where Joe Walsh's daughter, Lucy Walsh,
admitted that as Ashlee's keyboard player, she always doubled
Ashlee's voice while on tour.

I know that in any era there's going to be silly music acts like
Ashlee Simpson, Kevin Federline and Paris Hilton. I realize that
during Bob Dylan's time there were lots of feeble yet famous
music artists then too. My complaint is that it seems like in any
other era there was at least enough really fantastic and original
music being created to balance things out.

Let's go backwards. We've looked at the popular music of the
21st Century a little in the lists above and I don't see any
really original music in there at all. Some may argue that the
grunge era of the 90's produced some great and original music. I
argue that almost all of that music was so heavily influenced by
the rock of the 60's and 70's that it really wasn't that
original at all.

The music of the 80's matched the hair and clothes of the time,
lame. The synthesizer was new then, but the music was reasonably
bad, and certainly not timeless. But then we come to the 70's
and 60's. Those are the decades that last held any hope for
people like me who long for fresh, original, creative and
improvisational music.

In 1899 the Commissioner of the US Patent Office wrote
"Everything that can be invented has been invented." Alright,
maybe he was a little off. But in a way, everything that seems
new is really just new combinations of existing things. Music is
no different. I'm hoping that we return to the days when the
combinations of beats, rhythms, harmonies and melodies become as
creative as they were in the 60's and 70's.

But maybe things haven't changed much since even Socrates'
times. He thought kids were tyrants, as if his generation was the
last of a dying breed of angelic children. Maybe he just didn't
understand the kids of his era, and maybe I'm the same way.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason OConnor runs Rock and Pop Concert Tickets - A great 
place to buy tickets to cheap concerts across North America. 
http://www.bestshowticketslasvegas.com/


--- END ARTICLE ---

Get HTML or TEXT Copy-and-Paste Versions Of This Article at:
http://thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/db/o/why-is-pop-music-so-bad-today.shtml#get_code



.....................................

TERMS OF REPRINT - Publication Rules 
(Last Updated:  May 11, 2006)

Our TERMS OF REPRINT are fully enforcable under the terms of:

  The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
  http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.2281.ENR:

.....................................

*** Digital Reprint Rights ***

* If you publish this article in a website/forum/blog, 
  You Must Set All URL's or Mailto Addresses in the body 
  of the article AND in the Author's Resource Box as
  Hyperlinks (clickable links).

* Links must remain in the form that we published them.
  Clean links should point to the Author's links without
  redirects having been inserted into the copy.

* You are not allowed to Change or Delete any Words or 
  Links in the Article or Resource Box. Paragraph breaks 
  must be retained with articles. You can change where
  the paragraph breaks fall, but you cannot eliminate all
  paragraph breaks as some have chosen to do.

* Email Distribution of this article Must be done through
  Opt-in Email Only. No Unsolicited Commercial Email.


* You Are Allowed to format the layout of the article for 
  proper display of the article in your website or in your 
  ezine, so long as you can maintain the author's interests 
  within the article.

* You may not use sentences from this article as an input
  for any software that steals sentences from others in 
  order to build an article with software. The copyright on
  this article applies to the "WHOLE" article.


*** Author Notification ***

  We ask that you notify the author of publication of his
  or her work. Jason OConnor can be reached at:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** Print Publication Reprint Rights ***

  If you desire to publish this article in a PRINT 
  publication, you must contact the author directly 
  for Print Permission at:  
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



.....................................

If you need help converting this text article for proper 
hyperlinked placement in your webpage, please use this 
free tool:  http://thephantomwriters.com/link-builder.pl



=====================================================================

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE SUBMISSION

http://thePhantomWriters.com is a paid article distribution 
service. thePhantomWriters.com and Article-Distribution.com 
are owned and operated by Bill Platt of Stillwater, Oklahoma USA.

The content of this article is solely the property 
and opinion of its author, Jason OConnor
http://www.bestshowticketslasvegas.com/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
---------------------------------------------------------------------







*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

To have your article appear in this distribution list,
you must absolutely be a client of thePhantomWriters.

We offer a paid article distribution service, and this
is one of the more than 60 groups where we submit our
client articles. To learn more about our program, visit:

http://thePhantomWriters.com/x.pl/tpw/index.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thePhantomWriters/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to