The discussion about what is and isn't in scope and whether we should
try to fix DNS theft/transfer as a single example reminded me of this
slide deck from Peter Gutmann:
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/pki_risk.pdf that talks
about shades of grey when assessing riskiness of a site.  If a
certificate was used consistently from a certain CA for 3 years and
hosted in California, then switches to a Russian CA and host - even if
it's CA-signed, that's suspicious.

-tom
_______________________________________________
therightkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey

Reply via email to