Hi all,
I've been watching the list with interest and while there have been some good ideas and discussion on here, I don't get the impression that this is really ready for a productive BoF in Paris. So as of now I won't be proposing to schedule a slot for this group. If you disagree, or if you're not sure but would like to try push for a BoF, that's great but you need to get moving quickly, proposing concrete topics for a BoF. To have any chance of happening, that needs to be done and dusted *this* week. The IETF can supply a room and logistics, and I can supply a BoF chair, but the people on the list need to be the ones proposing stuff and I've not seen enough of that so far. If, as I suspect, its still a bit early for a BoF on this topic, but a bunch of you will be at the Paris IETF in any case, then you can self-organise a bar-BoF/side-meeting, (if you do, please try do it in a real bar:-). You don't need me or anyone else to help with that, just do it if you want. Meanwhile even if nothing happens for this in Paris, the list is here and you'll hopefully get to discussing some concrete proposals in the near future. There are specific (if not that well documented) proposals out there and I'd love to see their proponents arguing their relative merits in detail so's we could see if there are things that the IETF could/should be doing. Regards, Stephen. PS: On the list name and implied cardinality: I was the one who came up with that, and used it for the one and only reason that it was the least bad thing suggested. Its just not really significant. (But maybe if it inspires debate it was a good choice;-) PPS: If you're just shy or not sure about IETF process stuff, but would like to propose something, feel entirely free to mail me off-list and I'll try help if I can. _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
