I would offer that I agree with Stephen that it is too soon for a work group forming BOF. However, I would also offer that given the list traffic, we have more than enough for a high-bandwidth discussion. I would be up for a bar BOF or, if it makes more sense, a workshop outside the constraints of the more-than-packed IETF week.
On Feb 7, 2012, at 11:01 AM, =JeffH wrote: > Excellent summary Steve, thanks. > > I'm up for a bar-BoF/side-meeting in Paris. > > > > There are specific (if not that well documented) > > proposals out there and I'd love to see their proponents > > arguing their relative merits in detail so's we > > could see if there are things that the IETF could/should > > be doing. > > Agreed. I think that those folks having not spoken up or dived into this > discussion is telling wrt how early all this is. AFAIK there will be some > in-the-wild experiments run by various folk and that should further inform > discussions such as this. > > =JeffH > > _______________________________________________ > therightkey mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
