On 07/09/12 13:51, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 7 September 2012 01:09, =JeffH <[email protected]> wrote:
I am supportive of this initiative, and intend to participate.
In terms of quick comments on draft charter, having pointers to the existing
work would be good, e.g..
Certificate Transparency: Spec and Working Code
http://www.links.org/?p=1226
http://code.google.com/p/certificate-transparency/source/browse/
Certificate Transparency Version 2
http://www.links.org/?p=1259
http://sump2.links.org/files/CertificateTransparencyVersion2.pdf
It looks like upon a quick skim that the I-D source might have kept up with
CertificateTransparencyVersion2.pdf..
http://code.google.com/p/certificate-transparency/source/browse/doc/sunlight.xml
yes?
Yes - actually consistent with v2.1a, which I just uploaded to www.links.org.
Ben, I don't see a link to your v2.1a PDF on www.links.org.
I guessed and found it here...
http://sump2.links.org/files/CertificateTransparencyVersion2.1a.pdf
Having that I-D submitted before 24-Sep would be helpful in terms of getting
an actual BoF scheduled (remember I-Ds can be very drafty and rough)
Will do - we're going to add some more to it next week so I'll wait for that.
HTH
=JeffH
_______________________________________________
therightkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
--
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online
_______________________________________________
therightkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
