-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/2012 02:09 AM, =JeffH wrote: > I am supportive of this initiative, and intend to participate. > > In terms of quick comments on draft charter, having pointers to > the existing work would be good, e.g..
The proposed charter doesn't mention any one technique and I'm hoping the intent of a Transparancy WG would be to look at more than the proposal that happens to be called "transparency", yes? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBJy7wACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfgMACdFByoecq0LtE/SllTTGzZwhGA imoAoJDPBRW7R1pP/qU4K8SHgvgfbOAL =F43w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
