[[ I changed the subject line because this should be discussed on the list *before* the meeting. It is not a separate agenda item, yet. ]]
On Oct 23, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > One of the key issues as far as acceptability to CAs is concerned is impact > on issue processes. In particular it has to be possible to deploy any > experimental infrastructure without touching the certificate issue code. > > I think this is going to mean that CT proofs have to end up being embedded in > something other than the cert they relate to. I can't see the precert idea as > viable. Transporting the CT proofs in OCSP is viable though - provided some > changes are made there. > _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
