On 24 October 2012 03:02, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > [[ I changed the subject line because this should be discussed on the list > *before* the meeting. It is not a separate agenda item, yet. ]] > > On Oct 23, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One of the key issues as far as acceptability to CAs is concerned is impact >> on issue processes. In particular it has to be possible to deploy any >> experimental infrastructure without touching the certificate issue code.
What? Why? Are you saying CAs can't test modified issuance code? >> I think this is going to mean that CT proofs have to end up being embedded >> in something other than the cert they relate to. I can't see the precert >> idea as viable. Transporting the CT proofs in OCSP is viable though - >> provided some changes are made there. What changes? >> > > _______________________________________________ > therightkey mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
