On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 November 2012 13:07, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Phill, > > > > Not sure what Ben thinks of that but I'd rather > > just AD sponsor one draft for now. A split like > > that would definitely make sense for the > > standards-track work that's envisaged to follow > > though. Do you think that's really a must-have > > at this stage? I guess I don't, as of now. > > My view is that teasing the two parts apart is hard and so I agree it > would be good for standards track, but don't want to do it for > experimental.
My objective was to get the two parts teased apart rather than the presentation as separate documents. I think the exercise would improve the clarity of the spec. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
