On 20 November 2012 13:17, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 20 November 2012 13:07, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Phill, >> > >> > Not sure what Ben thinks of that but I'd rather >> > just AD sponsor one draft for now. A split like >> > that would definitely make sense for the >> > standards-track work that's envisaged to follow >> > though. Do you think that's really a must-have >> > at this stage? I guess I don't, as of now. >> >> My view is that teasing the two parts apart is hard and so I agree it >> would be good for standards track, but don't want to do it for >> experimental. > > > My objective was to get the two parts teased apart rather than the > presentation as separate documents. > > I think the exercise would improve the clarity of the spec.
Its still hard :-) I'll see what I can do, though. _______________________________________________ therightkey mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
