It looks like a bug, they should not be used for depth. I will try to fix it.
Thanks, S. On 13 June 2011 08:28, marco corvi <marco.corvi at elsagdatamat.com> wrote: > I agree with bruce. > > also noticed that splay shots are used for the "depth". > it might make sense, but i rather have the depth > computed with the survey shots only. > > marco. > > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 08:44 +1200, Bruce wrote: > > Hi Andrew > > Yes, when splay shots to an unlabelled station such as '-' are included > in a > > dataset, such as when using a distoX or similar, the statistics do not > make > > that much sense to me. I think it still works the way you describe in > 5.3.7. > > > > To my way of thinking, splay shots are not part of the survey length (and > > therefore should not be duplicate either), they are analogous to LRUD. > IF > > they are to be reported, they should be separately reported as 'total > splay > > length' and 'number of splay stations' (could be further broken down into > > 'surface splays' and 'cave splays' if one was being picky). > > > > If there were to be a compromise for the sake of simplicity I would > prefer > > that therion exclude splay information from all the reported statistics > (as > > it ignores LRUD, which are really just special splay shots), rather than > the > > apparently selective way the splay shots are currently included. > > > > Regards > > Bruce > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: therion-bounces at speleo.sk [mailto:therion-bounces at speleo.sk] On > Behalf > > Of Andrew Atkinson > > Sent: Monday, 13 June 2011 6:10 a.m. > > To: List for Therion users > > Subject: [Therion] Duplicates including adding splays? > > > > Hello > > > > Therion 5.3.5 ubuntu 10.04 > > > > In the attached file the following information is given about the survey > > > > title: RhinoPassage > > length: 189.07m (surface 0.00m, duplicated 24.58m) > > vertical range: 20.51m (from 1.27 at RhinoPassage at 20.38m to > > 1.3 at RhinoPassage at -0.13m) > > north-south range: 92.47m (from 1.27 at RhinoPassage at 33.43m to > > 1.53 at RhinoPassage at -59.04m) > > east-west range: 66.67m (from 1.53 at RhinoPassage at 66.67m to > > 1.0 at RhinoPassage at 0.00m) > > number of shots: 281 > > number of stations: 282 > > > > The duplicate figure got me wondering, it seems to be counting the > > splays but the length does not. As the duplicate none splays are only > > about 10m. > > Maybe this is what is wanted, but I personally think that the duplicate > > value should be the amount taken off the length by the duplicate flag? > > Ie why is length treated differently to duplicate (something to do with > > the way survex treated splays and duplicate as different, I think that > > splays are not included in extend in survex) > > > > Maybe 2 figures would be better, duplicate length and duplicate splays. > > > > {probably best to ignore this next bit} > > Oh this leads to all sorts of thinks that are really not important, like > > maybe giving the length of all the splays, and the number of stations, > > is it really 282 or really 54. All depends on your definition I guess > > > > Andrew > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Therion mailing list > > Therion at speleo.sk > > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion > > > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > Therion at speleo.sk > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20110613/49d3d509/attachment.html>
