This bug should be also fixed now in 5.3.8. If not, please let me know. S.
On 13 June 2011 10:00, Stacho Mudrak <lists at group-s.sk> wrote: > It looks like a bug, they should not be used for depth. I will try to fix > it. > > Thanks, S. > > On 13 June 2011 08:28, marco corvi <marco.corvi at elsagdatamat.com> wrote: >> >> I agree with bruce. >> >> also noticed that splay shots are used for the "depth". >> it might make sense, but  i rather have the depth >> computed with the survey shots only. >> >> marco. >> >> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 08:44 +1200, Bruce wrote: >> > Hi Andrew >> > Yes, when splay shots to an unlabelled station such as '-' are included >> > in a >> > dataset, such as when using a distoX or similar, the statistics do not >> > make >> > that much sense to me. I think it still works the way you describe in >> > 5.3.7. >> > >> > To my way of thinking, splay shots are not part of the survey length >> > (and >> > therefore should not be duplicate either), they are analogous to LRUD. >> >  IF >> > they are to be reported, they should be separately reported as 'total >> > splay >> > length' and 'number of splay stations' (could be further broken down >> > into >> > 'surface splays' and 'cave splays' if one was being picky). >> > >> > If there were to be a compromise for the sake of simplicity I would >> > prefer >> > that therion exclude splay information from all the reported statistics >> > (as >> > it ignores LRUD, which are really just special splay shots), rather than >> > the >> > apparently selective way the splay shots are currently included. >> > >> > Regards >> > Bruce >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: therion-bounces at speleo.sk [mailto:therion-bounces at speleo.sk] On >> > Behalf >> > Of Andrew Atkinson >> > Sent: Monday, 13 June 2011 6:10 a.m. >> > To: List for Therion users >> > Subject: [Therion] Duplicates including adding splays? >> > >> > Hello >> > >> > Therion 5.3.5 ubuntu 10.04 >> > >> > In the attached file the following information is given about the survey >> > >> > title: RhinoPassage >> > length: 189.07m (surface 0.00m, duplicated 24.58m) >> > vertical range: 20.51m (from 1.27 at RhinoPassage at 20.38m to >> > 1.3 at RhinoPassage at -0.13m) >> > north-south range: 92.47m (from 1.27 at RhinoPassage at 33.43m to >> > 1.53 at RhinoPassage at -59.04m) >> > east-west range: 66.67m (from 1.53 at RhinoPassage at 66.67m to >> > 1.0 at RhinoPassage at 0.00m) >> > number of shots: 281 >> > number of stations: 282 >> > >> > The duplicate figure got me wondering, it seems to be counting the >> > splays but the length does not. As the duplicate none splays are only >> > about 10m. >> > Maybe this is what is wanted, but I personally think that the duplicate >> > value should be the amount taken off the length by the duplicate flag? >> > Ie why is length treated differently to duplicate (something to do with >> > the way survex treated splays and duplicate as different, I think that >> > splays are not included in extend in survex) >> > >> > Maybe 2 figures would be better, duplicate length and duplicate splays. >> > >> > {probably best to ignore this next bit} >> > Oh this leads to all sorts of thinks that are really not important, like >> > maybe giving the length of all the splays, and the number of stations, >> > is it really 282 or really 54. All depends on your definition I guess >> > >> > Andrew >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Therion mailing list >> > Therion at speleo.sk >> > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Therion mailing list >> Therion at speleo.sk >> http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion > >
