Stacho You are so accommodating!
Based on my reading of the Survex manual it would seem that Therion already has a superior means of defining arbitrary tubes - simply by drawing passage outlines. So unless it is a trivial exercise don't do it just on my account. My vote for your valuable development time would be to bias it towards improving Therions information reporting in; -list outputs -map and atlas headers And refining 'map object' management for map and atlas pdf outputs related to; -bug fixes -generally improving the 'single data to many outputs' paradigm. These are the areas where I find Therion most limiting when it comes to managing a larger project. On the other hand it might just be my imagination that is the limiting factor. Regards Bruce From: Stacho Mudrak <lists <at> group-s.sk> Subject: <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3cCAP35%2bgFuStoQH%2dEqF%5f GM0wSW1o7SMF0qEf8%5fdimT%3dEgf%2bcTO9Q%40mail.gmail.com%3e> Re: Is therion data dimensions like survex *data passage Newsgroups: <http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.therion> gmane.comp.gis.therion Date: 2011-11-02 09:03:42 GMT (20 hours and 59 minutes ago) You are right, therion's 'data dimensions' is not like the survex's '*data passage'. But I was thinking of it for some time already. I will try to implement it. Thanks, S. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20111103/26a25502/attachment.html>
