Normally, extend ignore 6
should do the job. But there was a bug in the code, so it did not work as intended. It should be fixed now in the latest commit. If some of you have more complex entended elevation projects, could you please check, whether this change does not introduce new errors? The behaviour of "extend ignore <from> <to>" should not be affected. Thanks, S. On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 at 12:08, Tarquin Wilton-Jones via Therion < therion@speleo.sk> wrote: > What can I say?! > > Bruce, that was some black magic. I don't quite understand why asking it > to ignore a leg then changing your mind and asking it to draw it anyway, > would cause it to then split it at the point you want. I wonder if I > will be able to make sense out of that in future. > > What is makes me wonder is; why doesn't this exist? > extend break 6 > > This could cause a centreline "weakness", and prefer (but not mandate) > breaking at that point. It would massively simplify this control, and be > much more predictable. > > > try to change the line in your .th file from: > > > > extend ignore 6 5 > > > > to: > > > > extend ignore 5 6 > > > > There is no leg 6-5 in your data, but there is leg 5-6. > > > This does not work. I assume that is because it is trying to extend the > centreline from left to right, so it steps backwards through that oxbow > (compared with the data). Or maybe I have not played with Bruce's > solution enough... > > Cheers! > > Tarquin > _______________________________________________ > Therion mailing list > Therion@speleo.sk > https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion >
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
