Here is a very good interview of Terrance Howard. He does talk a little about the Iron Man stuff and interestingly enough he was as surprised by it as everyone else. His reaction was very calm. You should listen to this. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95833828
-Sterling On Oct 15, 11:24 am, Ronald Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cheadle is 5'8 compared to Howard's 6'0. Cheadle also just comes off > as having a smaller build. I know he was just in that spy/terrorist movie > where he played or marine or something, but, while he is a better actor, he > just doesn't fit the role. > > For some reason, when I try to think of Cheadel, Tim Meadows first pops in my > head - and I'm just not as intimidated by the Lady's Man as I should be of > Rhodey. > > --- On Wed, 10/15/08, Michael Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Michael Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [The Unique Geek] Re: War Machine in Iron Man 2 will be played by... > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2008, 10:14 AM > > I'm of the opinion that Cheadle can play any role re set his mind to. And in > all honesty he and Howard are not all that different body type wise. If you > are going to use the argument that Rhoedy should be buff than Howard wouldn't > have made a good choice either. > > You know who would have made a great Rhodey years ago? Michael Dorn. > Seriously. > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Ronald Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Isn't this why they usually make people sign on for extra movies in their > contracts? See, this is why you need to get the contracts done right > upfront. (that's what I do for a living ;)I can understand maybe why they > couldn't get RDJ to sign for multiples, but even after all this posting, I > can't remember the actors name other than something Howard. And even with > RDJ, he hadn't done a jack in major movie in 10 years. He too should have > been begging to sign-on for multiples. Heck, there is a rumor that the > Watchmen cast had to sign on for sequels! And they said it came down to > 'financual issues'?!?! The movie made over $500M! I'm not blaming the > company, I'm blaming this moron for not taking a major role in a guaranteed > money maker. And Don Cheedle is cheaper!?!? I'm thinking he's just not a > moron. Maybe Howard was a really a douche on set and nobody wanted to work > with him again; so, they said 'financial issues' to try to make it look > better. > > -- > This post/e-mail was written by Michael Bailey, Superman Apologist > > Hey, I have a podcast > > http://www.viewsfromthelongbox.com > > Hey, I have a comic book blog. > > http://www.fortressofbaileytude.com > > Hey, I'm on the Unique Geek > > http://www.theuniquegeek.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Unique Geek" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
