I happen to like my Connery PJs, a lot. But I don't have no Brosnan rattle, it's a blanket. I carry it everywhere. Connery forever!
E On Nov 14, 10:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I saw a sneak preview of QoS on Wed. and without giving spoilers, I will say > it is probably the most violent Bond movie ever.? Craig is a steel-and-ice > eyed killing machine.? I liked it, but...Casino Royale is more enjoyable.? I > think they listened to some of the Ed camp's criticism and tried to open the > movie up a little, and as a result it sort of has a mixed identity, at times > feeling like there are three different directors.? The stuff that works, > though, WORKS.? He's good, fool, and I know you're wearing your Sean Connery > footie pajamas right now and shaking your rattle with the Brosnan sticker on > it, but give it a rest.? Craig isn't the handsome Bond you have printed on > your pillow case, he's the killer bulldog Bond you want crashing through the > skylight and saving you. > > Salmon liked it! > > The music sucked, though.? They need to address that.? Not anywhere close to > a Bond theme.? Better than that awful Audioslave shit from the last one but > still no good.? Get Bjork to do one. > > Oh, the music in the Watchman trailer sucked too!? Yikes, what was that > coldplay wannabe shit?? Muse, I am told.? Super bad, like when the Crow went > dancing across the rooftops to Stone Temple Pilots bad. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: The Unique Geek <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:27 am > Subject: [The Unique Geek] Re: Next Bond > > You just need to learn to ignore Sterling, like I do. And, I'm sure > Todd does the same thing. I didn't realize there were replies until > Todd's replied. :) > As for the recent Craig movies, they're not Bond movies, they're just > simple action movies. They don't have the Bond flair since the > franchise began. I agree with what Vanessa stated that Connery was the > quintessential Bond. There will never be another actor to come close > to him in the Bond movies however, Lazenby and Brosnan came pretty > close. > > E > > On Nov 14, 9:32?am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sterling - You are really forcing my hand here....? It's Craig, not Graig.? > Check your facts.? ;) > > > ? > > > The Irredeemable Shag > > >http://onceuponageek.com > > > ? > > > ? > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: [The Unique Geek] Re: Next Bond > > From: Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, November 14, 2008 7:37 am > > To: The Unique Geek <[email protected]> > > I disagree with your assessment of Graig. > > He's bringing it back to the original concept and persona of Bond > > before he was turned into a characture of himself. > > This Bond character is more real than any of the others before. And > > his acting is also much better. He seems to be in the character and > > not just playing to the audience as the double innuendos of women's > > name are spoken through the screen. > > Daniel Graig's Bond portrayal is the difference between the movie Spy > > Game and Get Smart. > > -Sterling > > On Nov 14, 6:56?am, Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would totally love to see Taye Diggs as Bond. > > > >http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2008/11/14/2008-11-14... > > > > I'm still having a hard time getting past Craig as Bond. I think it's > > > time for him to move on. I agree that Craig is a good actor and that > > > Casino Royale was entertaining but some people just don't have the > > > Bond mojo. Timothy Dalton didn't have it, Daniel Craig doesn't have it > > > either. > > > > E --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Unique Geek" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
