but is that bad? Microsoft has been a micro-hair from a monopoly. If their products are not the best and there are now more and possibly better options (which may be more secure!) shoul di feel bad for MicroSoft?
Very few tears will fall from my eyes... On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Cary Preston <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/14/dell_ubuntu_windows_security/ > > -- Shared with Google Share Button > > Regardless of the validity behind the statement, things just haven't been > going well for Microsoft ever since Ballmer took over. They completely > missed the boat on portable devices (Windows Mobile 7 is an afterthought, > even though it's likely a good OS for smartphones), royally screwed up with > Vista, and haven't shown any innovation compared to their rivals. Not long > ago Google was little more than a search engine, and Apple ten years ago was > scrabbling to revive their main product line. If major manufacturers like > Dell turn against them and start pushing other OSes, it's really going to > bode ill for Microsoft. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Unique Geek" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<theuniquegeek%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Unique Geek" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
