Spoilers!








There were a couple other Easter eggs as well. In the asgardian
weapons room, there was something that looked suspiciously like the
Eye of Agamotto. The first person the try to lift Mjolnir after it
fell was JMS. The guy who pulls the bed off his truck is of course
Star Lee. In town, there's a billboard encouraging a "Journey into
Mystery."
 Walt Simonson has a cameo at the feast scene at the end. Eric's
friend the gamma researcher is obvious. Anyone spot any others?

On May 9, 10:24 am, Jason Service <[email protected]> wrote:
> This was posted earlier on the thread titled: Thor
>
> Dr Jen and i went with some of the St Pete Geeks this weekend.
>
> I would say the movie over all was...just fine, good even. I enjoyed it. I
> was entertained by it. I was not blown away by it.
>
> SPOILER SPACE
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *
> I thought that the movie sort of followed a formula. In Iron Man we saw
> Stark in the "Fun-Vee" just as it gets rocketed and then we got some back
> story and it brought us "up to date" with that story and we moved forward.
> Thor did the same thing. I don't recall The Incredible Hulk doing that...but
> i may need to just re-watch it.
>
> Natalie Portman was good. I kind of feel bad for her though, this is another
> "blockbuster" movie where she has to have a romantic relationship that just
> doesn't pass the smell test. Ok, to be fair it isn't the steaming pile of
> dung that the Attack of the Clones "love" development was, but this one just
> doesn't get the job done.
>
> Chris Helmswort was a great Thor. Fantastic casting. I might have wanted a
> Rx for 'roids to make him even more muscular, but the dude looked the part
> and pulled off the character. The character development itself
> seemed...rushed. Not to the point of unbelievability, but the pace of his
> "change" was quick...likely too quick.
>
> Loki was an interesting character. I didn't like the new origin they have
> given Loki, but i liked the way that his character subtly moved things and
> shifted things early in the film...truly mischievous! As the story moved on
> however, his motivation wained...i suppose they had to finally make him into
> a villain. meh.
>
> Got a look at another Avenger, Hawkeye. Um, if this is what Hawkeye is going
> to be, he'll be just as boring in the Avengers as he has been in the comics.
>
> Overall i enjoyed the movie! See it again, um, probably not in the theater,
> but i will get it on NetFlix for sure!
>
> If anyone out there who reads this and is going to go see it again, or wants
> to do the research, i *think* there may have been a small easter egg when
> Thor 'snatches" back Jane Foster's notebook, there were papers under the
> book that we had a second or 2 to see, that may have been some Avenger
> related docs...i really didnt' see and i am just guessing but i would like
> to know if anyone else saw what they said.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Cary Preston <[email protected]> wrote:
> > No spoilers. Good, but not great; left me wanting more. The movie as a
> > whole felt rushed. Thor was perfect; the look was dead on, the character was
> > exactly as I would have hoped. Natalie Portman is gorgeous but completely
> > pointless, her character has no background and could almost have been done
> > without. Loki was dead on as well.The after-trailer footage provides fodder
> > for what will create the conflict in The Avengers.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "The Unique Geek" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to