JMS = J Michael Straczynski, who handled the well-received relaunch of
Thor a few years ago.

The Eye of Agamotto?  By the hoary hordes of Hoggarth!  A Doctor
Strange movie would be a riot!

On May 10, 8:08 am, Jason Service <[email protected]> wrote:
> JMS?
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Adam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Spoilers!
>
> > There were a couple other Easter eggs as well. In the asgardian
> > weapons room, there was something that looked suspiciously like the
> > Eye of Agamotto. The first person the try to lift Mjolnir after it
> > fell was JMS. The guy who pulls the bed off his truck is of course
> > Star Lee. In town, there's a billboard encouraging a "Journey into
> > Mystery."
> >  Walt Simonson has a cameo at the feast scene at the end. Eric's
> > friend the gamma researcher is obvious. Anyone spot any others?
>
> > On May 9, 10:24 am, Jason Service <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This was posted earlier on the thread titled: Thor
>
> > > Dr Jen and i went with some of the St Pete Geeks this weekend.
>
> > > I would say the movie over all was...just fine, good even. I enjoyed it.
> > I
> > > was entertained by it. I was not blown away by it.
>
> > > SPOILER SPACE
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > I thought that the movie sort of followed a formula. In Iron Man we saw
> > > Stark in the "Fun-Vee" just as it gets rocketed and then we got some back
> > > story and it brought us "up to date" with that story and we moved
> > forward.
> > > Thor did the same thing. I don't recall The Incredible Hulk doing
> > that...but
> > > i may need to just re-watch it.
>
> > > Natalie Portman was good. I kind of feel bad for her though, this is
> > another
> > > "blockbuster" movie where she has to have a romantic relationship that
> > just
> > > doesn't pass the smell test. Ok, to be fair it isn't the steaming pile of
> > > dung that the Attack of the Clones "love" development was, but this one
> > just
> > > doesn't get the job done.
>
> > > Chris Helmswort was a great Thor. Fantastic casting. I might have wanted
> > a
> > > Rx for 'roids to make him even more muscular, but the dude looked the
> > part
> > > and pulled off the character. The character development itself
> > > seemed...rushed. Not to the point of unbelievability, but the pace of his
> > > "change" was quick...likely too quick.
>
> > > Loki was an interesting character. I didn't like the new origin they have
> > > given Loki, but i liked the way that his character subtly moved things
> > and
> > > shifted things early in the film...truly mischievous! As the story moved
> > on
> > > however, his motivation wained...i suppose they had to finally make him
> > into
> > > a villain. meh.
>
> > > Got a look at another Avenger, Hawkeye. Um, if this is what Hawkeye is
> > going
> > > to be, he'll be just as boring in the Avengers as he has been in the
> > comics.
>
> > > Overall i enjoyed the movie! See it again, um, probably not in the
> > theater,
> > > but i will get it on NetFlix for sure!
>
> > > If anyone out there who reads this and is going to go see it again, or
> > wants
> > > to do the research, i *think* there may have been a small easter egg when
> > > Thor 'snatches" back Jane Foster's notebook, there were papers under the
> > > book that we had a second or 2 to see, that may have been some Avenger
> > > related docs...i really didnt' see and i am just guessing but i would
> > like
> > > to know if anyone else saw what they said.
>
> >  > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Cary Preston <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > No spoilers. Good, but not great; left me wanting more. The movie as a
> > > > whole felt rushed. Thor was perfect; the look was dead on, the
> > character was
> > > > exactly as I would have hoped. Natalie Portman is gorgeous but
> > completely
> > > > pointless, her character has no background and could almost have been
> > done
> > > > without. Loki was dead on as well.The after-trailer footage provides
> > fodder
> > > > for what will create the conflict in The Avengers.
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > "The Unique Geek" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected].
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "The Unique Geek" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to