Ed, the site you linked to is blocked for me at the moment, but I will say that the film version of DOOM had a long FPS sequence in it as well. Which, given that it was a film adaption of DOOM, made a lot of sense.
~Luke On Jul 21, 7:54 am, Edward Crosby <[email protected]> wrote: > And yet another thing: Check this out. I played this game and didn't make > the connection but, yep, the trailer POV part is nothing new; more so of a > rip off. > > http://bit.ly/oFc0uK > > ---------------------------------------- > Have a Better One, > Edward Crosbyhttp://about.me/edwardcrosby > > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Edward Crosby <[email protected]> wrote: > > And another thing: My catching up on The Twitter and The Google+ this > > morning I see a pattern among the people I follow that there isn't a whole > > lot of positive hype from the trailer. Most people seem very, very negative. > > > ---------------------------------------- > > Have a Better One, > > Edward Crosby > >http://about.me/edwardcrosby > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Edward Crosby <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Yep, definitely too soon for a reboot, or for even another Spider-Man > >> movie for that matter. > >> I'm a big time fan of the FPS video games and didn't like that portion of > >> the trailer at all. If they really wanted to do something different, sure, > >> but they should have kept it at less 10 seconds. What they displayed seemed > >> like an eternity. We all know Spidey can swing from a web between > >> buildings, > >> why did we need to see that again in a trailer in any format. > > >> ---------------------------------------- > >> Have a Better One, > >> Edward Crosby > >>http://about.me/edwardcrosby > > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Luke <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Shag, I also thought the first person bit looked very much like a > >>> video game. I guess if you show Spidey swooping all over Manhattan > >>> with the camera whirling around him, you are too close to the visuals > >>> of the previous films. > > >>> ~Luke > > >>> On Jul 20, 9:50 pm, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > Gotcha. At least that's a different bad guy. I can totally see that > >>> scientist guy as Dr Connors. That makes sense. > > >>> > While the acting and casting seemed fine, I still think the too-soon > >>> reboot was unnecessary. > > >>> > Signed, > >>> > Grumpy Old Fanboy > > >>> > -------- Original Message -------- > >>> > Subject: Re: [The Unique Geek] Amazing Spider-Man Trailer > >>> > From: Cary Preston <[email protected]> > >>> > Date: Wed, July 20, 2011 10:48 pm > >>> > To: "[email protected]" > >>> > <[email protected]>This > >>> movie has the Lizard as the primary baddie. > >>> > On Jul 20, 2011, at 10:47 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > Okay, I'm gonna be a disgruntled fanboy here... is five years really > >>> long enough to wait before your reboot a franchise? > > >>> > Spider-Man 3 (2007) to Amazing Spider-Man (2012) = 5 years > > >>> > Maybe so, the rebooted Batman after eight years: > > >>> > Batman & Robin (1997) to Batman Begins (2005) = 8 years > > >>> > It just seems too soon for a complete retelling of his origin. I was > >>> prepared to accept just a Spider-Man story that took place in high school. > >>> But to retell the origin again, and possibly include Green Goblin (seemed > >>> to > >>> be hints to me)? Ugh. > > >>> > Also, i could have done without the video game-esque first person > >>> shooter footage. > > >>> > The Irredeemable > >>> Shaghttp://firestormfan.comhttp://onceuponageek.comhttp:// > >>> twitter.com/firestormfan > > >>> > -------- Original Message -------- > >>> > Subject: [The Unique Geek] Amazing Spider-Man Trailer > >>> > From: Luke <[email protected]> > >>> > Date: Wed, July 20, 2011 2:38 pm > >>> > To: The Unique Geek <[email protected]> > >>> > Due about a year from now. > >>>http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/spider-man-2012/trailer > >>> > -- > >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> Groups "The Unique Geek" group. > >>> > To post to this group, send email [email protected]. > >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email > >>> [email protected]. > >>> > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > >>> groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en. > > >>> > -- > >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> Groups "The Unique Geek" group. > >>> > To post to this group, send email [email protected]. > >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email > >>> [email protected]. > >>> > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > >>> groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en. > > >>> > -- > >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> Groups "The Unique Geek" group. > >>> > To post to this group, send email [email protected]. > >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email > >>> [email protected]. > >>> > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > >>> groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en. > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "The Unique Geek" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]. > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Unique Geek" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
