Personally I'd be happy with either a Daredevil movie or TV series. For a TV 
series, I'd go with a more traditional Nelson & Murdock show. Lots of trials 
and night time justice. For a movie, I'd go with more of a Frank Miller style 
dark story. Kinda like Matt Murdock's life falling apart.

Shag

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 20, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Michael Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wouldn't rule this idea out because Marvel as a studio has a history of 
> trying things that haven't been done before with comic book adaptations.  I 
> mean the idea of staying after the credits being mandatory was cemented by 
> IRON MAN and INCREDIBLE HULK.  And there is a precedent for a TV version 
> going to the cinemas.  The sixties BATMAN series had a major motion picture 
> released between seasons 1 and 2, mainly to use to pitch the show to the 
> European market.  So I can't say it's not possible or has never been done.  I 
> will say it is unlikely.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Luke Jaconetti <[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael, if you will indulge me some corporate thinking for a few moments, I 
> want to snowball on your idea and say "why not do both?" 
>  
> With Agent Coulson moving over to the small-screen SHIELD series in some 
> capacity, a Daredevil TV series would offer a good chance for synergy for 
> Marvel Studios and Disney. 
>  
> Let's say that the weekly TV series features Matt Murdock and Foggy Nelson 
> defending clients in the court room (court room procedurals are cheap and 
> relatively easy to shoot) by day, while at night Hornhead fights drug 
> dealers, gang bangers, and gun runners.  Maybe the crime in the city is 
> overseen by the Kingpin, or, if you want to go in a different direction, The 
> Owl or The Rose.
>  
> Then in one of the movies, have Matt Murdock show up, played by the same 
> actor as the TV series.  Whether DD shows up or not would depend on the 
> story.  You have a basic synergy between the TV show and the films in that 
> way.  It's part of the same universe, just a different media format.
>  
> In the same way you can introduce other Marvel characters to the same 
> "cinematic" universe without doing full fledged films.  I have long espoused 
> that Power Man & Iron Fist / Heroes For Hire would make a perfect TV series, 
> for example.  Why not have Luke and Danny show up in the theoretical DD 
> series?  Maybe DD can run afoul of HYDRA on the show, and then Cap fight them 
> in his movie?  ("These are the same group who were causing trouble in Hell's 
> Kitchen a few months back.")  Maybe Matt gets involved in a case involving a 
> Wakandan national and King T'Challa (or maybe T'Chaka is still king and 
> T'Challa is the prince) gets involved, even if he doesn't appear?  
>  
> I am just spit-balling here but your statement started the gears turning.  
> Now the important question: Would you have a small screen Daredevil be the 
> grim version or the brash version?
> 
> On Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:37:57 AM UTC-4, Michael Bailey wrote:
> I think Daredevil would be better served as a television series in all 
> honesty.  Sure you could make a good Daredevil film and while I was very 
> amused at Ben Affleck taking shots at the movie he was in recently there were 
> good parts to the 2003 film.  On the other hand DD is a street level hero and 
> I think a series would work better because you wouldn't have to "go big".  
> I'd love to see a weekly series like that where you can explore Matt as a 
> character and his world and build to the big moments instead of forcing 
> everything into a 2 hour (or so) structure. 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Luke Jaconetti <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://nerdbastards.com/2012/10/12/daredevil-officially-home-under-the-marvel-studios-banner/
>  
> Evidently the deal to "trade" Galactus for Daredevil was never reached, and 
> the Man Without Fear is back under the control of Disney/Marvel Studios.
>  
> I have never been a fan of Daredevil.  I think this is why I like the Ben 
> Affleck movie, because the nit-picky stuff didn't really stand out to me like 
> it would a more involved fan.  That having been said I have read the first 
> two issues of the new Mark Waid series and very much enjoyed them, enough to 
> keep reading it for the time being. 
>  
> Marvel Studio's film schedule is pretty full at the moment with Iron Man 3, 
> Thor 2, Cap 2, Ant-Man, and Avengers 2.  I think there is a chance to insert 
> Daredevil in the form of Matt Murdock into any of the solo films save Thor 
> (perhaps defending Tony Stark or Eric O'Grady in court, or preparing legal 
> documents for Steve Rogers), and then bring in Daredevil proper in Avengers. 
>  
> I would not make him a full fledged Avenger, but an ally.  Maybe he uncovers 
> the first parts of a much larger scheme and works with the team to take down 
> the Big Bad.
>  
> What do you folks think?  Do you like Daredevil being back under the Marvel 
> Studios banner and potentially part of the Marvel cinematic Universe?
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/theuniquegeek/-/D-RyHHE6b3MJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> 
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This post/e-mail was written by Michael Bailey, Superman Apologist
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/theuniquegeek/-/My-RIOAO4NIJ.
> 
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This post/e-mail was written by Michael Bailey, Superman Apologist
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to