1.3.10 has solved the problem, thank you :)

On Dec 10, 8:51 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you give 1.3.10 a spin, see if that helps? There was a fix related to STI 
> stuff, though not sure it's impacting your issue...
>
> --
> Pat
>
> On 09/12/2009, at 3:38 AM, Al-Faisal El-Dajani wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I removed everything from the define_index block, except for one indexes 
> > line the set_property :delta line, and it still misbehaves. However, I 
> > copied the define_index block to another model (with appropriate changes of 
> > course) and it works just fine.
>
> > What I failed to mention in my first post is that the Image model is the 
> > parent in an STI relation. Maybe this has something to do with it?
>
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this issue locally, so for the models that don't
> > work, can you start commenting out fields and attributes one by one,
> > see if you can determine what line is causing the problem?
>
> > --
> > Pat
>
> > On 07/12/2009, at 8:35 PM, tomlion wrote:
>
> > > Hello Pat
> > > I met the same problem.
> > > I have also tried to use set_property :delta => true and the delta
> > > index does not work too
> > > I came into script/console and do some type like this:
>
> > > Loading development environment (Rails 2.3.4)
> > >>> Item.methods.collect{|name| name if name =~ /delta/}.uniq
> > > => [nil, "delta_indexed_by_sphinx?", "delta_index_names"]
> > >>> Item.delta_index_names
> > > => ["item_delta"]
> > >>> Item.methods.collect{|name| name if name =~ /delta/}.uniq
> > > => [nil, "index_delta", "delta_indexed_by_sphinx?", "suspended_delta",
> > > "delta_object", "delta_index_names"]
>
> > > is it a lazy-loading issue?
> > > and how i can fix it?
>
> > > On Dec 7, 9:50 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> It sounds like it could be a lazy-loading issue - what version of
> > >> Rails are you using? Do you have TS installed as a gem or a plugin?
> > >> Does it work when you create a new Image in script/console?
>
> > >> --
> > >> Pat
>
> > >> On 07/12/2009, at 3:02 AM, Al-Faisal El-Dajani wrote:
>
> > >>> Hello all,
>
> > >>> I just upgraded to Thinking Sphinx 1.3.8, and wanted to use delayed
> > >>> deltas. I set up my define_index as per the documentation and for
> > >>> all
> > >>> models except one it is working just fine.
>
> > >>> For the model that is causing trouble, Image, I have the following
> > >>> define_index block:
>
> > >>> define_index do
> > >>>    indexes title
> > >>>    indexes caption
> > >>>    indexes comments.body, :as => :comment_body
> > >>>    indexes tags.name, :as => :tags_names
> > >>>    indexes user.username, :as => :username
>
> > >>>    where 'moderated = 1'
>
> > >>>    has :id, :as => :media_id
> > >>>    has user_id
> > >>>    has user_views.user_id, :as => :viewed_by
> > >>>    has created_at
>
> > >>>    set_property :delta => :delayed
> > >>>  end
>
> > >>> This is the only model that has an association in the define_index
> > >>> block, and the only model to have a where clause.
>
> > >>> The problem is that modifying any instance of this model does not
> > >>> add
> > >>> a new job into the DB. What I noticed is that after any other model
> > >>> adds a job to the DB this model starts adding jobs, but if this was
> > >>> the first model to be modified it does not add them.
> > >>> Also, the where clause is being ignored when adding new jobs to the
> > >>> DB, but indexing still respects the where clause. Is this the
> > >>> intended
> > >>> behavior?
>
> > >>> I've been using ThinkingSphinx(1.1.6) for a few months now, and it
> > >>> was
> > >>> working fine. When I upgraded to use the delayed delta I started
> > >>> having this problem. Any ideas?
>
> > >>> --
>
> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > >>> .
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> .
> > >>> For more options, visit this group 
> > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en
> > >>> .
>
> > > --
>
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > [email protected]
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en
> > > .
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > Al-Faisal El-Dajani
> > 10/6
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.


Reply via email to