Path, For what it's worth, +1 on this issue. Just spent a while dealing with it before I found this thread. Looking forward to that config file.
Thanks. Hayes On Dec 28, 5:22 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > If you're usingSphinx0.9.8, then it'll all be fine, provided you've set > address and port in yoursphinx.yml file (which, given things are working, I'm > pretty sure you have). Even if you're usingSphinx0.9.9, as long as you're not > using any of the new features/changes, then it'll all still work smoothly. > > -- > Pat > > On 28/12/2009, at 9:20 PM, kc wrote: > > > Thanks for the quick response, Pat. I'll keep an eye out for the > > update toriddle. > > > In the meantime...is my understanding correct that thinking_sphinx and > >riddleare still able to figure out how to communicate properly with > > thesphinxprocess on the other machine? As far as I can tell, the > > end result seems to function ok. Not sure if we're causing some perf > > issues. > > > Thanks > > > kc > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "ThinkingSphinx" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
