Thanks Jim, Do you have an any idea How to get rid of this problem? Thanks, Mike
On Aug 10, 11:09 am, Jim Ruther Nill <[email protected]> wrote: > line 17 of > /usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/browsercms-3.1.0/lib/cms/behaviors/searching.rb > declares a 'search' named_scope that conflicts with TS's search method. > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Mike Disuza <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Pat, > > I just a created simple rails app and tried your options. I found that > > your options are working fine. > > When ever I am doing User.search "", :order=>:first_name it is working > > fine but whenever I am doing ThnikingSphinx.search > > "", :order=>:first_name then it is not working. > > > Also, Is there any issue with Browser CMS ? > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > On Aug 10, 10:03 am, Mike Disuza <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Pat, > > > I have tried both the options, but no luck. My trace log is as > > > foolows:- > > > > 1) Property.search 'this', :order=> :name > > > /usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/browsercms-3.1.0/lib/cms/ > > > behaviors/searching.rb:17: warning: multiple values for a block > > > parameter (2 for 1) > > > from > > /usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.8/lib/ > > > active_record/named_scope.rb:92 > > > => []>> ThinkingSphinx.search 'this', :order=> :name > > > > => [] > > > > 2) Property.search 'this', :order => :the_name > > > /usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/browsercms-3.1.0/lib/cms/ > > > behaviors/searching.rb:17: warning: multiple values for a block > > > parameter (2 for 1) > > > from > > /usr/local/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.8/lib/ > > > active_record/named_scope.rb:92 > > > => []>> ThinkingSphinx.search 'this', :order => :the_name > > > > => [] > > > > Also, if you see I am getting an error whenever I doing > > > "Property.search 'this', :order=> :name". > > > One more thing I am integrating the Sphinx/Thinking-Sphinx in Browser > > > CMS application. Will it be causing an issue? > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike > > > > On Aug 10, 9:37 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Mike > > > > > Firstly, I'm going to start with the obvious, just to make sure - > > apologies if you've done this already. > > > > > 1. Change your define_index block to the following: > > > > > define_index do > > > > indexes :name, :sortable => true > > > > indexes description > > > > indexes rate,:sortable => true > > > > indexes neighbourhoods.name, :as=>:neighbourhood > > > > where 'properties.deleted = 0' > > > > has exclusive > > > > has published > > > > has created_at, updated_at > > > > end > > > > > 2. Run rake ts:rebuild > > > > 3. Try the following in script/console: Property.search '', :order => > > :name > > > > > If that doesn't work, then here's something else to try: > > > > > 1. Slightly different define_index block: > > > > > define_index do > > > > indexes :name, :as => :the_name, :sortable => true > > > > indexes description > > > > indexes rate,:sortable => true > > > > indexes neighbourhoods.name, :as=>:neighbourhood > > > > where 'properties.deleted = 0' > > > > has exclusive > > > > has published > > > > has created_at, updated_at > > > > end > > > > > 2. Again, rake ts:rebuild > > > > 3. In script/console: Property.search '', :order => :the_name > > > > > If that doesn't work either, let me know, because it sounds like a bug > > to me. > > > > > -- > > > > Pat > > > > > On 09/08/2010, at 8:10 PM, Mike Disuza wrote: > > > > > > Hi Pat, > > > > > If I am not duplicating the field and attribute for sorting then it > > is > > > > > not working. > > > > > What is issue? I am not able to understand. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Mike > > > > > > On Aug 7, 6:48 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Hi Mike > > > > > >> That post is for float values, not strings... you really shouldn't > > need to double-up with a field *and* attribute. :sortable => true on the > > field should be all that's required. Still, at least it's working now. > > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Pat > > > > > >> On 06/08/2010, at 11:26 PM, Mike Disuza wrote: > > > > > >>> Hi Pat, > > > > >>> I have read the post > > >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/879267/searching-and-sorting-by-a-... > > > > > >>> which says that if you want to sort the field then only > > sortable=>true > > > > >>> will not sort the data but you have to add it in attributes as > > well, I > > > > >>> don't know why it is required. > > > > >>> So I have modified my indexes like that and it is working > > perfectly. > > > > > >>> define_index do > > > > >>> indexes :name, :as=> "pname", :sortable => true > > > > >>> indexes description > > > > >>> indexes rate,:sortable => true > > > > >>> indexes neighbourhoods.name, :as=>:neighbourhood > > > > >>> where 'properties.deleted = 0' > > > > >>> has exclusive > > > > >>> has published, :name > > > > >>> has created_at, updated_at > > > > >>> end > > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > >>> Mike > > > > > >>> On Aug 6, 6:15 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> That'll teach me for being so sure I had the answer ;) > > > > > >>>> Have you reindexed and restarted Sphinx since adding :sortable to > > the > > > > >>>> field? > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> Pat > > > > > >>>> On 06/08/2010, at 10:58 PM, Mike Disuza <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >>>>> Hi Pat, > > > > >>>>> I already tried this. Not working > > > > >>>>> "ThinkingSphinx.search "this", :order=> :name" > > > > >>>>> This is whole model(property.rb) fields which I have indexed. > > > > > >>>>> define_index do > > > > >>>>> indexes :name,:sortable => true > > > > >>>>> indexes description > > > > >>>>> indexes rate,:sortable => true > > > > >>>>> indexes neighbourhoods.name, :as=>:neighbourhood > > > > >>>>> where 'properties.deleted = 0' > > > > >>>>> has exclusive > > > > >>>>> has published > > > > >>>>> has created_at, updated_at > > > > >>>>> end > > > > >>>>> Is there any wrong in this? > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>> Mike > > > > > >>>>> On Aug 6, 5:53 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> Hi Mike > > > > > >>>>>> When you're sorting, use :name, not "name" - if you're using a > > > > >>>>>> string, then Thinking Sphinx behaves a different way (using the > > > > > >>>>>> extended sort mode, instead of attribute asc/desc sort mode). > > > > > >>>>>> So, using a symbol should take care of it all. > > > > > >>>>>> Cheers > > > > > >>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>> Pat > > > > > >>>>>> On 06/08/2010, at 10:12 PM, Mike Disuza wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > > > >>>>>>> No I have only property model and which have these fields to > > index. > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>>> Mike > > > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 6, 4:43 pm, Jim Ruther Nill <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> do you any other indexed models? > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Mike Disuza < > > [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > > >>>>>>>>> I have indexing as follows > > > > >>>>>>>>> "define_index do > > > > >>>>>>>>> indexes :name,:sortable => true > > > > >>>>>>>>> indexes description > > > > >>>>>>>>> has created_at, updated_at > > > > >>>>>>>>> end" > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Whenever I am doing search like > > > > >>>>>>>>> " ThinkingSphinx.search "this" ". I am getting search result > > but > > > > >>>>>>>>> whenever I am doing sorting with name like > > > > >>>>>>>>> " ThinkingSphinx.search "this", :order => > > > > >>>>>>>>> "name",:sort_mode=>:desc " I > > > > >>>>>>>>> am not getting any search result. It returns a blank array. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me what is wrong with my code? > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>>>>>> Tushar > > > > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > > > >>>>>>>>> Google Groups > > > > >>>>>>>>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > > >>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>>>> . > > > > >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]<thinking-sphinx%[email protected]> > > <thinking-sphinx > > > > >>>>>>>>> %[email protected]> > > > > >>>>>>>>> . > > > > >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >>>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>>>>>>> visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com > > > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > Google > > > > >>>>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > > >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>> . > > > > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<thinking-sphinx%[email protected]> > > > > >>>>>>> . > > > > >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/ > > > > >>>>>>> group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > Google > > > > >>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<thinking-sphinx%[email protected]> > > > > >>>>> . > > > > >>>>> For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en > > > > >>>>> . > > > > > >>> -- > > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<thinking-sphinx%[email protected]> > > . > > > > >>> For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<thinking-sphinx%[email protected]> > > . > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<thinking-sphinx%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------- > visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
