Ahh ok, I get it! Sorry - took a while for the penny to drop.
Thanks for all your help! S On Aug 23, 3:15 pm, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, you could do it with Riddle, but I think it's simpler just to use TS and > Rails environments. > > Good luck! > > -- > Pat > > On 23/08/2010, at 7:48 PM, tokumine wrote: > > > > > Hi Pat, > > > Thanks for the feedback. I wish I could lean towards your solution! :) > > > I'll investigate running a parallel instance with higher max_matches. > > Would it be easier to duplicate the main environment using Riddle > > directly? > > > Si > > > On Aug 23, 9:53 am, Pat Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Simon > > >> I'm not sure about the underlying Sphinx logic, but it wouldn't surprise > >> me if what you've suggested is the case. You could ask the question on the > >> Sphinx forum to confirm, though: > > >>http://www.sphinxsearch.com/forum/ > > >> I'd probably be leaning towards informing users that their downloaded > >> search results are limited to the most recent x values, unfortunately. Not > >> the ideal solution, of course... > > >> I guess an alternative, although it does add extra complexity, is to have > >> two searchd instances running (use a second environment), and the second > >> has the higher max_matches value. Would that be feasible? > > >> Cheers > > >> -- > >> Pat > > >> On 22/08/2010, at 5:10 PM, tokumine wrote: > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> We're trying to let users download their searches. > > >>> In app, we're fine to paginate results up to 1000 items, but on the > >>> download, we need to get the id's of all matching results. > > >>> The total number of items in the search index, and that are > >>> downloadable is around 150k > > >>> increasing max_matches to 150k in both the sphinx.yml and download > >>> search query arguments allows us to get all the ids *but* at a huge > >>> cost to query time for normal in app searches (searches go from 1-2s > >>> to around 10s) despite setting max_matches in our non-download in-app > >>> queries to 1k. > > >>> It seems like max_matches in the sphinx.yml is setting the pace of all > >>> queries, regardless of how low max_matches is specified in the actual > >>> search call arguments - is this normal behaviour? > > >>> Tks! > > >>> S > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "Thinking Sphinx" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]. > >>> For more options, visit this group > >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Thinking Sphinx" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx?hl=en.
