Hi Pat,

yes there is a join table in order to link the digitalassets table and the 
products (12NC) table.

I was wrong. It's a Many to Many association and not 1 to Many but I think 
there's no difference about the problem.

Thank you for your clarification about the search against Sphinx and not 
MySQL. I will try to adopt your suggestion.

Yuri.

Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 13:00:46 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto:
>
> Hi Yuri
>
> When you run the ts:index (or ts:rebuild) rake task, the Sphinx indexer 
> captures all the data from your MySQL database - search queries then talk 
> to Sphinx, not to MySQL. So, there’s no SQL query for performing the search 
> (though Sphinx has its own query language called SphinxQL, which is almost 
> identical to SQL, but it’s for talking to Sphinx, not databases).
>
> With your has_12ncs string - is this also in the database as foreign keys 
> via a has_many association? If so, it’ll very likely be better to create an 
> attribute in your Sphinx index which stores those foreign keys and then you 
> can filter on that.
>
> Also, perhaps you’re already aware, but for Sphinx, fields and attributes 
> are different things:
> http://pat.github.io/thinking-sphinx/sphinx_basics.html
>
> — 
> Pat
>
> On 14 Jan 2014, at 10:55 pm, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> I pass a :conditions like this:
>
> *conditions: { has_12ncs: _12nc_string }*
>
> where *has_12ncs* is a *TEXT* field in MySQL filled with a denormalized 
> structure of 1 to Many relationship between Digitalassets record and 12NC 
> (product)
>
> So the value in *has_12ncs* field can be *,123,456,789,*
>
> the string passed to conditions: { has_12ncs: _12nc_string } is something 
> like:
>
> ",851322311100, | ,851304211100, | ,851340001000, | ,851343701000, | 
> ,851343801000, | ,851343901000, | ,851344001000, | ,858758938790, | 
> ,858759001790, | ,858759038790, | ,858759701790, | ,851343801020, | 
> ,851343701020, | ,851344001020, | ,851343901020, | ,858759901740, | 
> ,858759701740, | ,857542038000, | ,857594938000, | ,857542438000, | 
> ,850120596000, | ,850120696000, | ,850120796000, | ,850122601020, | 
> ,850122701000, | ,850122701010, | ,850122801000, | ,850122801020, | 
> ,851315001000, | ,851321801000, | ,851535101040, | ,858600015000, | 
> ,858600096000, | ,858600096010, | ,850122901010, | ,850123001000, | 
> ,850123001020, | ,851315001010, | ,850123001010, | ,851328301000, | 
> ,851328301010, | ,851328401010, | ,851385101080, | ,854001638000, | 
> ,854071038080, | ,854071038090, | ,854074638070, | ,856070001080, | 
> ,856079838070, | ,857532008400, | ,857532108400, | , ,"
>
> That field has a FULLTEXT index.
>
> What's the query SQL triggered against this field and values? I'm not able 
> to print the pure SQL.
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 10:46:14 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi Yuri 
>>
>> I don’t think I’ve come across this problem before - that’s a *really* 
>> slow query! 
>>
>> Can you share your index definition with us? And are you also passing in 
>> a search term, or field/attribute filters (the :conditions and :with 
>> options)? 
>>
>> -- 
>> Pat 
>>
>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 8:40 pm, [email protected] wrote: 
>>
>> > Hi all, 
>> > for first sorry for my english. 
>> > 
>> > I've got a problem with RoR and Thinking Sphinx gem. 
>> > 
>> > I mean: everything works fine but when I try to get a search result 
>> > passing a lot of parameter values through Active Record and TS API my 
>> > application slow down and become unusable. 
>> > 
>> > I need to send queries on a MyISAM table with over 600.000 records 
>> > 
>> > There's a query field that I can match with 0 or N values 
>> > If I set 0 or few values the query is fast. 
>> > If I set 1000-2000 or more values for this field the query occurs over 
>> > 10 minutes. 
>> > 
>> > I'm not sure about the query slowness because the problem occurs only 
>> > when I try to get (for example) the total_count value. 
>> > 
>> > The query is something like: 
>> > Model.search match_mode: :extended, page: page, per_page: per_page, 
>> > :order => :updated_at, :sort_mode => :desc 
>> > 
>> > If I look in the searchd.query.log file I can find this informations 
>> > 
>> > [Tue Jan 14 09:42:08.394 2014] 774.749 sec [ext/2/attr- 64637 (0,20)] 
>> > [digitalasset_core,digitalasset_delta] @has_countries ,98, | ,88, | 
>> > ,ALL, | , , @has_12ncs ,851322311100, | ,851304211100, | ,851340001000,
>>  
>> > | ,851343701000, | ,851343801000, | ,851343901000, | ,851344001000, | 
>> > ,858758938790, | ,858759001790, | ,858759038790, | ,858759701790, | 
>> > ,851343801020, | ,851343701020, | ,851344001020, | ,851343901020, | 
>> > ,858759901740, | ,858759701740, | ,857542038000, | ,857594938000, | 
>> > ,857542438000, | ,850120596000, | ,850120696000, | ,850120796000, | 
>> > ,850122601020, | ,850122701000, | ,850122701010, | ,850122801000, | 
>> > ,850122801020, | ,851315001000, | ,851321801000, | ,851535101040, | 
>> > ,858600015000, | ,858600096000, | ,858600096010, | ,850122901010, | 
>> > ,850123001000, | ,850123001020, | ,851315001010, | ,850123001010, | 
>> > ,851328301000, | ,851328301010, | ,851328401010, | ,851385101080, | 
>> > ,854001638000, | ,854071038080, | ,854071038090, | ,854074638070, | 
>> > ,856070001080, | ,856079838070, | ,857532008400, | ,857532108400, | 
>> > ,857565108200, | ,857565738010, | ,857575738010, | ,857576838010, | 
>> > ,857582338080, | ,857584738000, | ,857586738000, | ,857586838080, | 
>> > ,857588838080, | ,857597838010, | ,857599938030, | ,854060038010, | 
>> > ,854070038010, | ,854080038010, | ,857580000110, | ,856087638010, | 
>> > ,857597838020, | ,857586838020, | ,857576838020, | ,854076738020, | 
>> > ,857597838030, | ,857587838010, | ,856010038020, | ,856087838020, | 
>> > ,857500038020, | ,857500138020, | ,857500238020, | ,857500338020, | 
>> > ,854020038020, | ,856010048020, | ,856010058020, | ,857500348020, | 
>> > ,857500358020, | ,857500368020, | ,857580001100, | ,851330038000, | 
>> > ,851330138000, | ,851330238000, | ,851330338000, | ,851330438000, | 
>> > ,851330538000, | ,851330601000, | ,851330701000, | ,851330801000, | 
>> > ,851330901000, | ,851331101000, | ,851331201000, | ,851331301000, | 
>> > ,851331401000, | ,851331501000, | ,851331838000, | ,851331938000, | 
>> > ,851338038000, | ,851338138000, | ,851338201000, | ,851338301000, | 
>> > ,851338401000, | ,851338501000, | ,851345638000, | ,851345738000ÿ 
>> > 
>> > the 12NCS are the values that I want to match in order to limit the 
>> > resultset. 
>> > 
>> > Can anybody help me? 
>> > Thanks in advance. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to [email protected]. 
>> > To post to this group, send email to 
>> > thinkin...@googlegroups.<http://googlegroups.com/>
>> com <http://googlegroups.com/>. 
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. 
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Thinking Sphinx" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thinking Sphinx" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to