Ok I thinks was an error in the attribute definition. I mean:
*has product_digitalassets.product_id, as => :product_ids --> NOT WORKS* *has product_digitalassets.product_id, :as => :product_ids --> WORKS* Il giorno giovedì 23 gennaio 2014 13:03:35 UTC+1, [email protected] ha scritto: > > Hi Pat, > > I've tried to make this modification. > > Add the attribute: > *has product_digitalassets.product_id, as => :product_ids* > > and changed the scope method in this way: > > > *sphinx_scope :with_12_nc* > > *....* > *with: { product_ids: **ids** }* > *....* > > *end* > > ids = Array of *product_id* (Integer) and not *product_12NC* (string) > > the M:N join table *product_digitalassets* has these fields > > *id (primary key)* > *product_id* > *code_12nc* > *digitalasset_id* > > I've executed the task *rake ts:rebuild *and everything seems ok but > unfortunately I've no matches in my result. > > Is it possibile to search through the foreign key product_id and not > primary key id of join table? Or is this the problem? > > Thanks again. > Yuri. > > Il giorno mercoledì 15 gennaio 2014 13:23:42 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto: >> >> Hi Yuri >> >> The attribute should probably be of the id column, as that’s an integer >> (but I presume code_12nc is a string? Sphinx doesn’t support multi-value >> string attributes, nor does it support filtering on single-value string >> attributes). >> >> So: >> >> has product_digitalassets.id, :as => :product_digitalasset_ids >> >> And then in your search, if you don’t have the id values, you’ll need to >> translate 12NC codes to the ids: >> >> ids = ProductDigitalasset.where(:code_12nc => params[:codes]).pluck(:id) >> >> And then searching: >> >> DigitalAsset.search :with => {:product_digitalasset_ids => ids} >> >> Does this make sense? >> >> -- >> Pat >> >> On 15 Jan 2014, at 10:31 pm, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I need a little bit of support again if you can. >> >> This is my situation: >> - digitalassets (table) / Digitalasset (Model) >> - products (table) / Product (Model) >> - product_digitalassets (table) / ProductDigitalasset (Model) >> >> class ProductDigitalasset < ActiveRecord::Base >> attr_accessible :digitalasset_id, :product_id, :code_12nc >> belongs_to :digitalasset >> belongs_to :product >> end >> >> The Join table above has also the code_12nc that I need other than the >> two foreign keys >> >> How can I set a correct attribute in order to filter by the 12NC >> (product)? >> >> I've several attributes like: >> has .. >> has ... >> >> What should I put at the end of the list? >> >> *has :product_digitalassets.code_12nc* not works. I red the >> documentation and I've tried different combinations but I'm not able to >> understand what I've to do exactly to catch the values in the join table. >> >> Thanks again. >> Yuri. >> >> >> Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 14:43:21 UTC+1, [email protected] >> scritto: >>> >>> Hi Pat, >>> >>> yes there is a join table in order to link the digitalassets table and >>> the products (12NC) table. >>> >>> I was wrong. It's a Many to Many association and not 1 to Many but I >>> think there's no difference about the problem. >>> >>> Thank you for your clarification about the search against Sphinx and not >>> MySQL. I will try to adopt your suggestion. >>> >>> Yuri. >>> >>> Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 13:00:46 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi Yuri >>>> >>>> When you run the ts:index (or ts:rebuild) rake task, the Sphinx indexer >>>> captures all the data from your MySQL database - search queries then talk >>>> to Sphinx, not to MySQL. So, there’s no SQL query for performing the >>>> search >>>> (though Sphinx has its own query language called SphinxQL, which is almost >>>> identical to SQL, but it’s for talking to Sphinx, not databases). >>>> >>>> With your has_12ncs string - is this also in the database as foreign >>>> keys via a has_many association? If so, it’ll very likely be better to >>>> create an attribute in your Sphinx index which stores those foreign keys >>>> and then you can filter on that. >>>> >>>> Also, perhaps you’re already aware, but for Sphinx, fields and >>>> attributes are different things: >>>> http://pat.github.io/thinking-sphinx/sphinx_basics.html >>>> >>>> — >>>> Pat >>>> >>>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 10:55 pm, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you for your answer. >>>> >>>> I pass a :conditions like this: >>>> >>>> *conditions: { has_12ncs: _12nc_string }* >>>> >>>> where *has_12ncs* is a *TEXT* field in MySQL filled with a >>>> denormalized structure of 1 to Many relationship between Digitalassets >>>> record and 12NC (product) >>>> >>>> So the value in *has_12ncs* field can be *,123,456,789,* >>>> >>>> the string passed to conditions: { has_12ncs: _12nc_string } is >>>> something like: >>>> >>>> ",851322311100, | ,851304211100, | ,851340001000, | ,851343701000, | >>>> ,851343801000, | ,851343901000, | ,851344001000, | ,858758938790, | >>>> ,858759001790, | ,858759038790, | ,858759701790, | ,851343801020, | >>>> ,851343701020, | ,851344001020, | ,851343901020, | ,858759901740, | >>>> ,858759701740, | ,857542038000, | ,857594938000, | ,857542438000, | >>>> ,850120596000, | ,850120696000, | ,850120796000, | ,850122601020, | >>>> ,850122701000, | ,850122701010, | ,850122801000, | ,850122801020, | >>>> ,851315001000, | ,851321801000, | ,851535101040, | ,858600015000, | >>>> ,858600096000, | ,858600096010, | ,850122901010, | ,850123001000, | >>>> ,850123001020, | ,851315001010, | ,850123001010, | ,851328301000, | >>>> ,851328301010, | ,851328401010, | ,851385101080, | ,854001638000, | >>>> ,854071038080, | ,854071038090, | ,854074638070, | ,856070001080, | >>>> ,856079838070, | ,857532008400, | ,857532108400, | , ," >>>> >>>> That field has a FULLTEXT index. >>>> >>>> What's the query SQL triggered against this field and values? I'm not >>>> able to print the pure SQL. >>>> >>>> Thanks again. >>>> >>>> >>>> Il giorno martedì 14 gennaio 2014 10:46:14 UTC+1, Pat Allan ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Yuri >>>>> >>>>> I don’t think I’ve come across this problem before - that’s a *really* >>>>> slow query! >>>>> >>>>> Can you share your index definition with us? And are you also passing >>>>> in a search term, or field/attribute filters (the :conditions and :with >>>>> options)? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Pat >>>>> >>>>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 8:40 pm, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi all, >>>>> > for first sorry for my english. >>>>> > >>>>> > I've got a problem with RoR and Thinking Sphinx gem. >>>>> > >>>>> > I mean: everything works fine but when I try to get a search result >>>>> > passing a lot of parameter values through Active Record and TS API my >>>>> >>>>> > application slow down and become unusable. >>>>> > >>>>> > I need to send queries on a MyISAM table with over 600.000 records >>>>> > >>>>> > There's a query field that I can match with 0 or N values >>>>> > If I set 0 or few values the query is fast. >>>>> > If I set 1000-2000 or more values for this field the query occurs >>>>> over >>>>> > 10 minutes. >>>>> > >>>>> > I'm not sure about the query slowness because the problem occurs only >>>>> >>>>> > when I try to get (for example) the total_count value. >>>>> > >>>>> > The query is something like: >>>>> > Model.search match_mode: :extended, page: page, per_page: per_page, >>>>> > :order => :updated_at, :sort_mode => :desc >>>>> > >>>>> > If I look in the searchd.query.log file I can find this informations >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > [Tue Jan 14 09:42:08.394 2014] 774.749 sec [ext/2/attr- 64637 (0,20)] >>>>> >>>>> > [digitalasset_core,digitalasset_delta] @has_countries ,98, | ,88, | >>>>> > ,ALL, | , , @has_12ncs ,851322311100, | ,851304211100, | >>>>> ,851340001000, >>>>> > | ,851343701000, | ,851343801000, | ,851343901000, | ,851344001000, | >>>>> >>>>> > ,858758938790, | ,858759001790, | ,858759038790, | ,858759701790, | >>>>> > ,851343801020, | ,851343701020, | ,851344001020, | ,851343901020, | >>>>> > ,858759901740, | ,858759701740, | ,857542038000, | ,857594938000, | >>>>> > ,857542438000, | ,850120596000, | ,850120696000, | ,850120796000, | >>>>> > ,850122601020, | ,850122701000, | ,850122701010, | ,850122801000, | >>>>> > ,850122801020, | ,851315001000, | ,851321801000, | ,851535101040, | >>>>> > ,858600015000, | ,858600096000, | ,858600096010, | ,850122901010, | >>>>> > ,850123001000, | ,850123001020, | ,851315001010, | ,850123001010, | >>>>> > ,851328301000, | ,851328301010, | ,851328401010, | ,851385101080, | >>>>> > ,854001638000, | ,854071038080, | ,854071038090, | ,854074638070, | >>>>> > ,856070001080, | ,856079838070, | ,857532008400, | ,857532108400, | >>>>> > ,857565108200, | ,857565738010, | ,857575738010, | ,857576838010, | >>>>> > ,857582338080, | ,857584738000, | ,857586738000, | ,857586838080, | >>>>> > ,857588838080, | ,857597838010, | ,857599938030, | ,854060038010, | >>>>> > ,854070038010, | ,854080038010, | ,857580000110, | ,856087638010, | >>>>> > ,857597838020, | ,857586838020, | ,857576838020, | ,854076738020, | >>>>> > ,857597838030, | ,857587838010, | ,856010038020, | ,856087838020, | >>>>> > ,857500038020, | ,857500138020, | ,857500238020, | ,857500338020, | >>>>> > ,854020038020, | ,856010048020, | ,856010058020, | ,857500348020, | >>>>> > ,857500358020, | ,857500368020, | ,857580001100, | ,851330038000, | >>>>> > ,851330138000, | ,851330238000, | ,851330338000, | ,851330438000, | >>>>> > ,851330538000, | ,851330601000, | ,851330701000, | ,851330801000, | >>>>> > ,851330901000, | ,851331101000, | ,851331201000, | ,851331301000, | >>>>> > ,851331401000, | ,851331501000, | ,851331838000, | ,851331938000, | >>>>> > ,851338038000, | ,851338138000, | ,851338201000, | ,851338301000, | >>>>> > ,851338401000, | ,851338501000, | ,851345638000, | ,851345738000ÿ >>>>> > >>>>> > the 12NCS are the values that I want to match in order to limit the >>>>> > resultset. >>>>> > >>>>> > Can anybody help me? >>>>> > Thanks in advance. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>> > To post to this group, send email to >>>>> > thinkin...@googlegroups.<http://googlegroups.com/> >>>>> com <http://googlegroups.com/>. >>>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. >>>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>>> >>>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Thinking Sphinx" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thinking Sphinx" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/thinking-sphinx. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
