Erlang is functional, and not OO. I also think someone's working on a C binding, - Eugene (berry)
----- Original Message ----- From: Pierce, J. Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Tue Jun 17 07:01:13 2008 Subject: RE: Instances of interfaces, request contexts? Sorry to butt in here, but what is the specific use-case of a non-OO Thrift language binding? Of the languages in the lib/ directory, the ones I know and love are all OO-capable. Perhaps I'm missing something though? OO-happy: C++, C#, java, perl, php, py, ruby, ML... What non-OO language do we need a Thrift binding for? Maybe this isn't a problem that needs a general-case solution, since OO is well established and most new languages implement one or more forms of OO. - Will -- J. Will Pierce, [EMAIL PROTECTED] NE&TO OSS - Principal Application Support Engineer AIM: WillPierceNETO Mobile: 609-781-xxxx -----Original Message----- From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 7:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Instances of interfaces, request contexts? On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Thorvald Natvig wrote: There's currently no way of doing this, as not all of the languages that thrift supports have the concept of objects.
